NOTE: This This poll closes on February 28th, 2018
There're two naming conventions for the current information model: 1) ETSI IFA011 names; 2) new proposal to align the class names within ONAP IM.
Examples: (IFA011 name / proposal for change)
VNFD/VNFDesc, VDU/VDUDesc, VirtualCpuData/VirtualCPUDesc, VirtualMemoryData/VIrtualMemoryDesc, Cpd/CPDesc, ...
| Panel | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||
Which one of the following options you would like to follow to resolve the naming convention divergence? Option 1: be consistent with ETSI IFA011 naming convention; give feedback to ETSI about the new proposals and make change to ONAP according to the result Option 2: make changes in ONAP IM and keep a mapping (e.g., in the description of the class/attribute) of ETSI names with ONAP ones Option 3: Option 2 + feedback to ETSI about the changes |
| Panel | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please put your @name in one of the option column and provide any comments you might have.
|