Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Panel
borderColorRed

Please put your @name in one of the option column for each attribute (or the "ALL" for simplicity) and provide any comments you might have.

AttributeOption 1Option 2Option 3Comments
"ALL"

All the listed attributes (for simplicity).

Brian Hedstrom: The link provided above for Key-Value Pair Registries.docx, for the HPA Key Value Pairs, is linking to an OLD version of the file. The vduComputeRequirements Registry Example provided in the link above DOES NOT MATCH the vduComputeRequirements Registry Example provided in NFVIFA(18)000162r1. It's not clear to me if we are voting on the attributes only in this attribute table, or also voting on supporting the key value pairs per NFVIFA(18)000162r1. I would suggest the key value pairs be a separate poll/discussion. My vote here is for the attribute table only.

maopeng zhang:

  1. All changes for HPA in R2 should be not effect R1 VoLTE case.  It needs the data model compatible, which the VoLTE case already used.
  2. please make it clear that add cloumn for OPT2, what attributes to be removed and how to removed(remove from KVP or remove from attributes existed in the clean page)
vduCpuRequirements





Xu Yang: Possible redundant attributes: numVirtualCpu, virtualCpuClock, logicalCpuPinningPolicy, logicalCpuThreadPinningPolicy, computeRequirements

Alexander Vul: the computeRequirements attribute is not HPA related.

Alexander Vul: These are not redundant. If I remember right, they are complementary...

vduMemRequirements





vduStorageRequirements





logicalNode


Xu Yang: Question: In the example document, the logical node requirements are categorized into compute, memory and network categories. But in IFA011, only one logicalNode attribute is defined, what's the mapping here?

Alexander Vul: There is a single k/v array holding attributes from three registries... We will optimize this, when registries are created.

Brian Hedstrom Is logicalNode and logicalNodeDescr the same attribute? I'm finding both in the Wiki. logicalNode is not listed as an attribute for Class: VirtualComputeDesc

nicIoRequirements


Xu Yang: Question: related to the above comment, if the network logical node requirements are specific, should this be a dedicated data type instead of a reference?

Alexander Vul: Hmm... Need to think about it. As I review both the NFV Profile based spec and the SOL spec, I am finding some oddities.. We may have a mistake or two in how things got modeled..

Brian Hedstrom nicloRequirements is not listed as an attribute (or data type for other attribute) for Class: VirtualNetworkInterfaceRequirements

networkInterfaceRequirements





logicalNodeData


Brian Hedstrom This appears to be a Class, not an attribute.