...
- As the current wiki division of a model for a given release contains "INPUT", "DISCUSSION", and "CLEAN" pages (note: there is no equivalent APPROVED wiki), there is no need to note this stereotype in the "Applied Stereotypes" column.
- The current wiki classification doesn't allow for applying the stereotype to both a Class and an Attribute, whereas in the Papyrus model it does. For example, in the wiki, one can't have a Class that is CLEAN (meaning the team has agreed they want that class in a release), and certain attributes to still be in a DISCUSSION phase (meaning the attribute as currently defined has not been agreed). Papyrus allows for this.
IISOMI Stereotypes
As stated in the introduction section, only the IISOMI stereotypes that are currently relevant to ONAP model development are defined.
...