Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Attendees:  Jessie, Xu, Michela, Chuyi, Lin Meng, Kevin (from memory)



Current Model Owners – Review and Discussion

    1. Current submodel
      1. Common – Kevin
      2. Infrastructure – Arun Gupta
      3. Party – Inactive

      4. Resource – Jessie presently;

        1. Includes NSD – Chuyi Guo interested in this area

        2. PNF

        3. Allotted Resource

      5. Service – Jessie;  Lin Meng interested.   Jessie happy to hand off after a bit more work

      6. Vnf – Kevin

    2. Commits on Fridays

    3. Coordination Activities

    4. Editor is responsible for final content of submodel – options

      1. Editor makes all changes – Jessie’s preference

      2. Brief handoff and someone else makes changes, and hands it back – Xu’s preference

      3. Working sessions with editor to refine model

      4. Manage model conflicts / potential corruption risks

      5. Recommendation for the moment – only designated model editors to push changes to gerrit – Kevin to send email


Training Class

    1. Needed? - Yes
    2. Accepted Date:  Wednesday, September 19th at 7am ET for 2 hours; meeting invite to be sent to onap-discuss[modeling].


Status of various submodels

    1. Common
      1. VES Model updates. 
      2. Kevin could explore json to UML per discussion with Jacqeline.  
      3. In future uml to json (move portions of spec to UML?)  
      4. Will be shared in resource sub-team.
    2. Infrastructure – Work in progress – maybe something for Dublin?
    3. Party – Inactive
    4. Resource
      1. NSD / NS – NSD currently active

      2. PNFD / PNF

      3. Allotted Resource – Kevin hopes to share in next week or so.

    5. Service

      1. Service Order

      2. Service Catalog

      3. Service Descriptor

      4. Composite /

    6. Composite &
      1. Atomic

    7. Jessie has one da of changes to make, and can then hand off to Lin Meng
    8. VNF

    9. Refinments
      1. Refinements per

    10. feeback
      1. Feedback stage



When do we call R3 done (may be something we must bring back to subcommittee)

    1. On milestone 3, moving to milestone 4 (two weeks time)
    2. PNFD maybe in release 3??   Has not been reviewed, may be a challenge to get this in R3.   Conclusion – will probably be R4
    3. New additions (allotted resource, VES, license, …) should go into R4.
    4. Time approaching for gendoc outputs going into RST format


Agenda Items Not Discussed

...