...
Project Name | Enter the name of the project |
---|
Target Release Name | Dublin |
Project Lifecycle State | Incubation, Core, Mature. Refer to ONAP Charter, section 3.3 Project Lifecycle for further information |
Participating Company List the company participating in this release. At least 3-4 organizations, including an operator are recommended. | AT&T, Orange, Huawei, ZTE, Nokia |
Scope
What is this release trying to address?
...
Item | Summary |
---|
Jira |
---|
server | ONAP JIRA |
---|
columns | key,summary,type,created,updated,due,assignee,reporter,priority,status,resolution |
---|
serverId | 425b2b0a-557c-3c0c-b515-579789cceedb |
---|
key | AAI-531 |
---|
|
|
|
Jira |
---|
server | ONAP JIRA |
---|
columns | key,summary,type,created,updated,due,assignee,reporter,priority,status,resolution |
---|
serverId | 425b2b0a-557c-3c0c-b515-579789cceedb |
---|
key | AAI-1331 |
---|
|
|
|
Jira |
---|
server | ONAP JIRA |
---|
columns | key,summary,type,created,updated,due,assignee,reporter,priority,status,resolution |
---|
serverId | 425b2b0a-557c-3c0c-b515-579789cceedb |
---|
key | AAI-1340 |
---|
|
|
|
Jira |
---|
server | ONAP JIRA |
---|
columns | key,summary,type,created,updated,due,assignee,reporter,priority,status,resolution |
---|
serverId | 425b2b0a-557c-3c0c-b515-579789cceedb |
---|
key | AAI-1406 |
---|
|
|
|
Jira |
---|
server | ONAP JIRA |
---|
serverId | 425b2b0a-557c-3c0c-b515-579789cceedb |
---|
key | AAI-1989 |
---|
|
|
|
Jira |
---|
server | ONAP JIRA |
---|
serverId | 425b2b0a-557c-3c0c-b515-579789cceedb |
---|
key | AAI-1998 |
---|
|
|
|
Jira |
---|
server | ONAP JIRA |
---|
serverId | 425b2b0a-557c-3c0c-b515-579789cceedb |
---|
key | AAI-2026 |
---|
|
|
|
Jira |
---|
server | ONAP JIRA |
---|
serverId | 425b2b0a-557c-3c0c-b515-579789cceedb |
---|
key | AAI-2096 |
---|
|
|
|
Jira |
---|
server | ONAP JIRA |
---|
serverId | 425b2b0a-557c-3c0c-b515-579789cceedb |
---|
key | AAI-2097 |
---|
|
|
|
Jira |
---|
server | ONAP JIRA |
---|
serverId | 425b2b0a-557c-3c0c-b515-579789cceedb |
---|
key | AAI-2099 |
---|
|
|
|
Jira |
---|
server | ONAP JIRA |
---|
serverId | 425b2b0a-557c-3c0c-b515-579789cceedb |
---|
key | AAI-2100 |
---|
|
|
|
Jira |
---|
server | ONAP JIRA |
---|
serverId | 425b2b0a-557c-3c0c-b515-579789cceedb |
---|
key | AAI-2102 |
---|
|
|
|
Jira |
---|
server | ONAP JIRA |
---|
serverId | 425b2b0a-557c-3c0c-b515-579789cceedb |
---|
key | AAI-2103 |
---|
|
|
|
Jira |
---|
server | ONAP JIRA |
---|
columns | key,summary,type,created,updated,due,assignee,reporter,priority,status,resolution |
---|
serverId | 425b2b0a-557c-3c0c-b515-579789cceedb |
---|
key | AAI-2111 |
---|
|
|
|
Use Cases
AAI R4 Use Case and Functional Requirements Impacts
Minimum Viable Product
- A&AI Core: Resources - CRUD REST API endpoints for A&AI inventory resources
- A&AI Core: Traversal - REST APIs for graph traversals. Some APIs use the Gremlin Server
- UI - An ONAP portal application used by operations for visualizing and searching
- Data Router: Makes decisions about workloads to be dispatched to search and tabular microservces. Includes logic to recognize and direct requests based on request archetypes.
- Search - Enable complex searches for sub graphs and functions that need to perform well across deeply nested structures using Elasticsearch. Used by the UI
- Champ - Abstraction from underlying graph storage systems that A&AI would interface with.
- Gizmo - CRUD Rest API endpoint for resources and relationships, delivering atomic interactions with the graph for improved scalability.
- Enricher - Enables complementing AT&T data with federated data from additional sources
- Cacher - The Response Caching Microservice (Cacher) is built to deliver multiple mechanisms of making API calls and populating the responses into a JSON datastore. The datastore is an embedded mongodb datastore, that stores cached API responses, which are updated via DMAAP events or can be synced by timed tasks or calls to the force sync endpoint.
- ESR - External System Registry component
...
Area | Actual Level | Targeted Level for current Release | How, Evidences | Comments |
---|
Performance | 1 | 1 |
| - 0 -- none
- 1 – baseline performance criteria identified and measured
- 2 & 3 – performance improvement plans created & implemented
|
Stability | 1 | 1 |
| - 0 – none
- 1 – 72 hours component level soak w/random transactions
- 2 – 72 hours platform level soak w/random transactions
- 3 – 6 months track record of reduced defect rate
|
Resiliency | 2 | 2 |
| - 0 – none
- 1 – manual failure and recovery (< 30 minutes)
- 2 – automated detection and recovery (single site)
- 3 – automated detection and recovery (geo redundancy)
|
Security | 1 | 2 (Stretch goal) |
| - 0 – none
- 1 – CII Passing badge + 50% Test Coverage
- 2 – CII Silver badge; internal communication encrypted; role-based access control and authorization for all calls
- 3 – CII Gold
|
Scalability | 1 | |
| - 0 – no ability to scale
- 1 – single site horizontal scaling
- 2 – geographic scaling
- 3 – scaling across multiple ONAP instances
|
Manageability | 1 | 1 |
| - 1 – single logging system across components; instantiation in < 1 hour
- 2 – ability to upgrade a single component; tracing across components; externalized configuration management
|
Usability | 1 | 1 |
| - 1 – user guide; deployment documentation; API documentation
- 2 – UI consistency; usability testing; tutorial documentation
|
...