...
Collectors
- RESTConf collector (Huawei)
Event Processors
- VES/Universal Mapper (TechM)
- PM-Mapper (Ericsson)
Analytics/RCA
- SON-Handler (former PCI-Handler) (Wipro)
- Heartbeat (AT&TSTRETCH GOAL)
- TCA-Gen2 (AT&T) Gen2 (STRETCH GOAL)
Common SDK design for DCAE services
...
Enhancement to existing DCAE components
- VES Collector (security) (STRETCH GOAL)
- HV_VES (logging)
- PRH (common sdk + BBS)
- DataFileCollector (security enhancement + resiliency support)
...
- PNDA Platform integration with DCAE for application deployment /configuration supportvia helm
- Integration with DMAAP BusController for Topic provisioning
- Support for Multi-site K8S cluster deployment via K8s plugin (dependency on AAI, MultiCloud)
- Contribution of blueprint generator tool in ONAP/DCAE
Migration of static service components into deployment into helm chart
Note: Work on STRETCH GOAL will progress through R4 however they cannot be committed yet for delivery (due to resource constraint /external dependencies /unclear requirement). These will be evaluated around M3 and will be either committed or deferred.
...
Green color → Target level ( details see Platform Maturity below)
- Performance: Level 1
- Stability: Level 1+ (80% coverage cannot be met overall due to number of components; will be phased and approached for Dublin)
- Resiliency: Level 2
- Security: Level 1+
- Scalability: Level 1
- Manageability: Level
2 (STRETCH GOAL) Level 2 (STRETCH GOAL)
...
Minimum Viable Product
The MVP of DCAE will include the necessary subcomponents supporting the primary objectives: meeting platform maturity goals and supporting the use cases.
...
Area | Actual Level | Targeted Level for current Release | How, Evidences | Comments |
---|
Performance | 1 | 1+ (Dublin recommendation 2 - cannot be committed due to Resource constraint) |
| - Level 0: no performance testing done
- Level 1: baseline performance criteria identified and measured (such as response time, transaction/message rate, latency, footprint, etc. to be defined on per component)
- Level 2: performance improvement plan created
- Level 3: performance improvement plan implemented for 1 release (improvement measured for equivalent functionality & equivalent hardware)
|
Stability | 2 | 1+ (Dublin recommendation 2 - may not reach 80% code coverage due to number of repository in DCAE; will be phased and some component targeted for R4) |
| - Level 0: none beyond release requirements
- Level 1: 72 hour component-level soak test (random test transactions with 80% code coverage; steady load)
- Level 2: 72 hour platform-level soak test (random test transactions with 80% code coverage; steady load)
- Level 3: track record over 6 months of reduced defect rate
|
Resiliency | 2 | 2 |
| - 0 – none
- 1 – manual failure and recovery (< 30 minutes)
- 2 – automated detection and recovery (single site)
- 3 – automated detection and recovery (geo redundancy)
|
Security | 1 | 1+ (Dublin recommendation 2 - cannot be committed for following reason)
- Resource constraint
- CADI library not available for Python
- Process of AAF certificate distribution in K8S between ONAP components and external (xNF) to be defined
DCAE team will integrate with Buscontroller integration for dynamic topic provisioning and AAF based role setting as STRETCH GOAL
|
| - Level 0: None
- Level 1: CII Passing badge
- Including no critical and high known vulnerabilities > 60 days old
- Level 2: CII Silver badge, plus:
- All internal/external system communications shall be able to be encrypted.
- All internal/external service calls shall have common role-based access control and authorization using CADI framework.
- Level 3: CII Gold badge
|
Scalability | 1 | 1
|
| - Level 0: no ability to scale
- Level 1: supports single site horizontal scale out and scale in, independent of other components
- Level 2: supports geographic scaling, independent of other components
- Level 3: support scaling (interoperability) across multiple ONAP instances
|
Manageability | 1 | 1+ (Dublin recommendation 2 (STRETCH GOAL- based on resource availability- cannot be committed for following reason) - Resource constraint to support #2 and #4 under Level2
(Level 2 - #1 and #3 will be targeted for Dublin)
|
| - Level 1:
- All ONAP components will use a single logging system.
- Instantiation of a simple ONAP system should be accomplished in <1 hour with a minimal footprint
- Level 2:
- A component can be independently upgraded without impacting operation interacting components
- Component configuration to be externalized in a common fashion across ONAP projects
- All application logging to adhere to ONAP Application Logging Specification v1.2
- Implement guidelines for a minimal container footprint
- Level 3
- Transaction tracing across components
|
Usability | 1 | 2 2 (STRETCH GOAL- based on resource availability)
|
| - Level 1:
- User guide created
- Deployment documentation
- API documentation
- Adherence to coding guidelines
- Level 2:
- Level 3
- Consistent UI across ONAP projects
- Usability testing conducted
- API Documentation
- Level 4
|
...