Versions Compared

Old Version 1

changes.mady.by.user Xu Yang

Saved on

compared with

New Version 2

changes.mady.by.user Xu Yang

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  • Agenda bashing - 5 minutes
  • Modeling Process discussion - 5 minutes
  • Model Proposals - 40 30 minutes
    • allotted resource - 20 0 minutes
    • ETSI alignment - 20 0 minutes
    • 5G RAN service - 0 minutes
    • CNF - 0 minutes
    • Geolocation - 0 minutes
    • PNF instance model - 0 minutes
  • Modeling Documentation & Glossary- 10 minutesModeling Process discussion - 5 minutes

Material:

...

  • Agenda bashing
  • Model Proposals

    • geolocation model:
      • start with the "place" class in the root model
      • discussions have been taken to identify the attributes
      • referenced TMF GB922 place model
      • Andy: suggest to provide information as required by the information element template (see the last bullet for the template)
      • next step: create UML class objects
    • allotted resource
      • continue discussion of runtime model
    • ETSI alignment
  • Modeling Documentation
  • Modeling Process
    • Ben is working on the working process for the use case team, finished M2, start M3 part
    • continue the discussion from the Benefit part
      • add integration and standardization
    • add "information element template" bullet to the M0 process
      • Generic Information Element Template
      • the template has referenced things from the use case template
      • Q: is the information element (mentioned in the template) expected to be a UML class? A: hopefully, but there is no constraints
    • Model WoW and Interaction Chart (process diagram update)
    • next step:
      • present in the next DDF
      • final review and adoption? cross-check with use case and arc teams?