Get ​complete details associated with a list of NearRT RIC's and

corresponding managed elements

trackingArea - String

<Changes at consumer end> - trackingArea should be an int

Complete Yang model. Refer CPS-196

cps-ran-schema-model

The result seems to be a a combination of many queries .from differnt data sources

Several elements not clear in model?!:

• TrackingArea = Tac? not string but 32bit int?
• gNBCUCPList, 0x
• cellCUList, 0x
• pLMNInfoList, 4x

Tac is a type, used by nRTAC, which is normal (normal not key) leaf for NRCellDUGroup which is used by NRCellDU (Yang List)

Proposed CPS query:
get all elelements (with children?) in list (NRCellDU) fiter on one attribue vale (nRTAC)

1. Fetch the List of Cells using API #2
2. Fetch the parents and grandparents pertaining to those cells

trackingArea - String

<Changes at consumer end> - trackingArea should be an int

[
  "15289",
  "15290",
  "15296"
]

cps-cavsta-onap-internal

+--rw taCellsList* [cellLocalId]
+--rw cellLocalId int32

Proposed CPS query:
get all elelements in list (NRCellDU) fiter on one attribue vale (nRTAC)

Same as #1 except without children

Refer cps-cavsta-onap-internal

cps-ran-schema-model

+--rw NearRTRIC* [idNearRTRIC]
+--rw idNearRTRIC string
+--rw attributes
| +--rw dnPrefix? DistinguishedName
| +--rw userLabel? string
| +--ro locationName? string
| +--ro gNBId? int64
| +--rw pLMNInfoList* [mcc mnc]
| | +--rw mcc Mcc
| | +--rw mnc Mnc
| | +--rw sNSSAIList* [sNssai]
| | +--rw sNssai string
| | +--rw status? string
| | +--rw configData* [configParameter]
| | +--rw configParameter string
| | +--rw configValue? int64

There is no model that defines that has a TrackingArea String

is this now the 'locationName'?

suggested CPS-action: Update DataNode with children (in this case a list) all children will be replaced! All unchanged data has to be provided too!

Note 1. SNSSAIList is a list contained within each element of PLMNInfo

Yes. Refer Section-3 for field mapping

Note 2. Please note this action replace all existing list element, it is NOT an add-to-element action

<Need to discuss>

{
   "gNBCUName":"cucpserver1", 
   "gNBId":98763,
   "gNBIdLength":5,
   "pLMNId":"310-410",
   "nFType":"CUCP",
   "nearRTRICId":11,
   "cellCUList":[
       {
    "cellLocalId":103594000,
    "pLMNInfoList":[
        {
            "pLMNId":"310-200",
            "sNSSAI":{
                "sNSSAI":"001-00110",
                "status":"ACTIVE",
                 "configData":{
                    "maxNumberOfConns": 7000
            }
            }
        }
    ]
}
   ]
}

cps-ran-schema-model

+--rw GNBCUCPFunction* [idGNBCUCPFunction]
+--rw idGNBCUCPFunction string
+--rw attributes
| +--rw gNBId? int64
| +--rw gNBIdLength? int32
| +--rw gNBCUName? string
| +--rw pLMNId* [mcc mnc]
| +--rw mcc Mcc
| +--rw mnc Mnc
+--rw NRCellCU* [idNRCellCU]
+--rw idNRCellCU string
+--rw attributes
| +--rw cellLocalId? int32
| +--rw pLMNInfoList* [mcc mnc]
| | +--rw mcc Mcc
| | +--rw mnc Mnc
| | +--rw sNSSAIList* [sNssai]
| | +--rw sNssai string
| | +--rw status? string
| | +--rw configData* [configParameter]
| | +--rw configParameter string
| | +--rw configValue? int64

from CPS point of view this case is similar as previous case (#3), just different target (parent)data node.

suggested CPS-action: Update DataNode with children (in this case a list) all children will be replaced! All unchanged data has to be provided too!

<Need to discuss>

{
   "gNBCUUPId":1111, 
   "gNBId":98763,
   "gNBIdLength":2,
   "pLMNId":"310-410",
   "resourceType":"DRB",
   "nearRTRICId":11,
    "pLMNInfoList":[
        {
            "pLMNId":"310-410",
            "sNSSAI":{
                "sNSSAI":"001-003",
                "status":"ACTIVE",
                "configData":{
                    "maxNumberOfConns": 3000
            }
            }
        }
    ]
}

cps-ran-schema-model

+--rw GNBCUUPFunction* [idGNBCUUPFunction]
| +--rw idGNBCUUPFunction string
| +--rw attributes
| +--ro gNBCUUPId? uint64
| +--rw gNBId? int64
| +--rw pLMNInfoList* [mcc mnc]
| +--rw mcc Mcc
| +--rw mnc Mnc
| +--rw sNSSAIList* [sNssai]
| +--rw sNssai string
| +--rw status? string
| +--rw configData* [configParameter]
| +--rw configParameter string
| +--rw configValue? int64

from CPS point of view this case is similar as previous 2 cases (#3, #4), just different target (parent)data node.

suggested CPS-action: Update DataNode with children (in this case a list) all children will be replaced! All unchanged data has to be provided too!

<Need to discuss>

{
   "gNBDUId":4, 
   "gNBId":98763,
   "gNBIdLength":5,
   "pLMNId":"310-410",
   "gNBDUName":"gnduserver4",
   "nFType":"DU",
   "nearRTRICId":22,
   "cellDUList":[
       {
    "cellLocalId":112951561,
    "operationalState":"ENABLED",
    "administrativeState":"UNLOCKED",
    "cellState":"ACTIVE",
    "nRPCI":12,
    "nRTAC":310,
    "resourceType":"PRB",
    "pLMNInfoList":[
        {
            "pLMNId":"310-410",            
            "sNSSAI":{
                "sNSSAI":"001-010000",
                "status":"ACTIVE",
                "configData":{
               "dLThptPerSlice": 9,
                "uLThptPerSlice": 10
                }
            }
        }
    ]
},
{
    "cellLocalId":112951562,
    "operationalState":"ENABLED",
    "administrativeState":"UNLOCKED",
    "cellState":"ACTIVE",
    "nRPCI":12,
    "nRTAC":310,
    "resourceType":"PRB",
    "pLMNInfoList":[
        {
            "pLMNId":"310-410",            
            "sNSSAI":{
                "sNSSAI":"001-010000",
                "status":"ACTIVE",
                "configData":{
               "dLThptPerSlice": 9,
                "uLThptPerSlice": 10
                }
            }
        }
    ]
},
{
    "cellLocalId":112951568,
    "operationalState":"ENABLED",
    "administrativeState":"UNLOCKED",
    "cellState":"ACTIVE",
    "nRPCI":12,
    "nRTAC":310,
    "resourceType":"PRB",
    "pLMNInfoList":[
        {
            "pLMNId":"310-410",            
            "sNSSAI":{
                "sNSSAI":"001-010000",
                "status":"ACTIVE",
                "configData":{
               "dLThptPerSlice": 9,
                "uLThptPerSlice": 10
                }
            }
        }
    ]
}
   ]
}

cps-ran-schema-model

+--rw GNBDUFunction* [idGNBDUFunction]
| +--rw idGNBDUFunction string
| +--rw attributes
| | +--ro gNBId? int64
| | +--rw gNBIdLength? int32
| | +--rw gNBDUId? int64
| | +--rw gNBDUName? string
| +--rw NRCellDU* [idNRCellDU]
| +--rw idNRCellDU string
| +--rw attributes
| +--rw cellLocalId? int32
| +--rw pLMNInfoList* [mcc mnc]
| | +--rw mcc Mcc
| | +--rw mnc Mnc
| | +--rw sNSSAIList* [sNssai]
| | +--rw sNssai string
| | +--rw status? string
| | +--rw configData* [configParameter]
| | +--rw configParameter string
| | +--rw configValue? int64
| +--rw nRPCI? int32
| +--rw nRTAC? Tac

from CPS point of view this case is similar as previous 2 cases (#3, #4, #5), just different target (parent)data node.

suggested CPS-action: Update DataNode with children (in this case a list) all children will be replaced! All unchanged data has to be provided too!

<Need to discuss>

{
    "rrmPolicyID":1,
    "resourceID":"113025289",
    "resourceType":"PRB",
    "sliceType":"eMBB",
    "quotaType":"STRICT",
    "rRMPolicyMaxRatio":0,
    "rRMPolicyMinRatio":10,
    "rRMPolicyDedicatedRatio":0,
    "rRMPolicyMemberList":[
        {
            "pLMNId":"310-400",
            "sNSSAI":"001-010000"
        }
    ]
}

cps-ran-schema-model

+--rw RRMPolicyRatio* [id]
| | +--rw id string
| | +--rw attributes
| | +--rw resourceType? string
| | +--rw rRMPolicyMemberList* [idx]
| | | +--rw idx uint32
| | | +--rw mcc Mcc
| | | +--rw mnc Mnc
| | | +--rw sNSSAI? SNssai
| | +--rw quotaType? QuotaType
| | +--rw rRMPolicyMaxRatio? uint8
| | +--rw rRMPolicyMinRatio? uint8
| | +--rw rRMPolicyDedicatedRatio? uint8

Currently CPS has no option to replace an entire list without udpating its parent wihc seems what is required here.

<Need to discuss>

{

cps-ran-inventory

+--rw ran-inventory
+--rw ran-slices* [rannfnssiid]
+--rw rannfnssiid string
+--rw sliceProfilesList* [sliceProfileId]
| +--rw sliceProfileId string
| +--rw sNSSAI? string
| +--rw maxNumberofUEs? int64
| +--rw latency? int64
| +--rw uLThptPerSlice? int64
| +--rw dLThptPerSlice? int64
| +--rw maxNumberofConns? int64
| +--rw uEMobilityLevel? string
| +--rw resourceSharingLevel? string
| +--rw coverageAreaList* string
| +--rw pLMNIdList* [mcc mnc]
| +--rw mcc Mcc
| +--rw mnc Mnc
+--rw subnetStatus? string
+--rw nsstid? string
+--rw slicetype? string
+--rw isshareable? string

little difference can be found between the request payload and the yang model.  Yang model is final one.

For CPS this seems like popluating populating the whole data-tree for given model in one go. i.e. replace all existing data

Modifed the YANG model to support storing list of Slices

[

{

   "gNBDUId":1,

   "gNBId":98763,

   "gNBIdLength":5,

   "pLMNId":"310-004",

   "gNBDUName":"gnduserver1",

   "nFType":"DU",

   "nearRTRICId":11,

   "cellDUList":[

       {

    "cellLocalId":1,

    "operationalState":"ENABLED",

    "administrativeState":"UNLOCKED",

    "cellState":"ACTIVE",

    "nRPCI":12,

    "nRTAC":310,

    "pLMNInfoList":[

        {

            "pLMNId":"310-004",

            "sNSSAI":{

                "sNSSAI":"001-003",

                "status":"ACTIVE",

                "configData":{

                "dLThptPerSlice": 45,

                "uLThptPerSlice": 40

                }

            }

        },

        {

            "pLMNId":"310-410",

            "sNSSAI":{

                "sNSSAI":"001-024",

                "status":"ACTIVE",

                "configData":{

                "dLThptPerSlice": 65,

                "uLThptPerSlice": 30

                }

            }

        }

    ]

}

   ]

}

]

cps-ran-schema-model

+--rw GNBDUFunction* [idGNBDUFunction]
| +--rw idGNBDUFunction string
| +--rw attributes
| | +--ro gNBId? int64
| | +--rw gNBIdLength? int32
| | +--rw gNBDUId? int64
| | +--rw gNBDUName? string
| | +--rw RRMPolicyRatio* [id]
| | +--rw id string
| | +--rw attributes
| | +--rw resourceType? string
| | +--rw rRMPolicyMemberList* [idx]
| | | +--rw idx uint32
| | | +--rw mcc Mcc
| | | +--rw mnc Mnc
| | | +--rw sNSSAI? SNssai
| | +--rw quotaType? QuotaType
| | +--rw rRMPolicyMaxRatio? uint8
| | +--rw rRMPolicyMinRatio? uint8
| | +--rw rRMPolicyDedicatedRatio? uint8
| +--rw NRCellDU* [idNRCellDU]
| +--rw idNRCellDU string
| +--rw attributes
| +--rw RRMPolicyRatio* [id]
| | +--rw id string
| | +--rw attributes
| | +--rw resourceType? string
| | +--rw rRMPolicyMemberList* [idx]
| | | +--rw idx uint32
| | | +--rw mcc Mcc
| | | +--rw mnc Mnc
| | | +--rw sNSSAI? SNssai
| | +--rw quotaType? QuotaType
| | +--rw rRMPolicyMaxRatio? uint8
| | +--rw rRMPolicyMinRatio? uint8
| | +--rw rRMPolicyDedicatedRatio? uint8
| +--rw cellLocalId? int32
| +--rw pLMNInfoList* [mcc mnc]
| | +--rw mcc Mcc
| | +--rw mnc Mnc
| | +--rw sNSSAIList* [sNssai]
| | +--rw sNssai string
| | +--rw status? string
| | +--rw configData* [configParameter]
| | +--rw configParameter string
| | +--rw configValue? int64
| +--rw nRPCI? int32
| +--rw nRTAC? Tac

Suggested CPS Actions:
query list element that have leaf (sNSSAI) with given value. Also get parent? (requires additional get)

Yes. Result includes parent as well.

Sample seems to return other/all(?) pLMNInfoList with different sNSSAIs

It doesn't matter. The grandparent node (GNBDUs) of the sNNSAI should be returned properly.

{

   "1": [

        {

            "cellLocalId": 111,

            "operationalState": "ENABLED",

            "administrativeState": "UNLOCKED",

            "cellState": "ACTIVE",

            "pLMNInfoList": [

                {

                    "pLMNId": "pLMNId1",

                    "sNSSAI": {

                        "sNSSAI": "001-003",

                        "status": "ACTIVE",

                        "globalSubscriberId": null,

                        "subscriptionServiceType": null,

                        "configData": {}

                    }

                },

                {

                    "pLMNId": "pLMNId2",

                    "sNSSAI": {

                        "sNSSAI": "001-024",

                        "status": "ACTIVE",

                        "globalSubscriberId": null,

                        "subscriptionServiceType": null,

                        "configData": {}

                    }

                }

            ],

            "nRPCI": 45,

            "nRTAC": 9087

        }

    ]

}

Note:

Key - nearRTRIC Id

value - list of cells

cps-ran-schema-model

| +--rw NRCellDU* [idNRCellDU]
| +--rw idNRCellDU string
| +--rw attributes
| +--rw cellLocalId? int32
| +--rw pLMNInfoList* [mcc mnc]
| | +--rw mcc Mcc
| | +--rw mnc Mnc
| | +--rw sNSSAIList* [sNssai]
| | +--rw sNssai string
| | +--rw status? string
| | +--rw configData* [configParameter]
| | +--rw configParameter string
| | +--rw configValue? int64
| +--rw nRPCI? int32
| +--rw nRTAC? Tac

Yang model defines only the DUCellList which is the value in the response.

Key is a nearRTRICId

Suggested CPS Actions:
query list element that have leaf (sNSSAI) with given value. Also get parent? (requires additional get)

Seems very simialr to #9

Sample seems to return other/all(?) pLMNInfoList with different sNSSAIs

Similar to #9

DCAE-slice-analysis-ms,

ML MS

This API will be replaced by AAI APIs

Do we need to discs CPS for this one. IF so which model etc?

This API can be ignored

{

    "1": {

        "dLThptPerSlice": 45,

        "uLThptPerSlice": 40

    }

}

Note:

key "1" is nearRTRICId - marked in green color

Value - nssai config - marked in purple color

+--rw cps-ran-schema
+--rw NearRTRIC* [idNearRTRIC]
+--rw idNearRTRIC string
+--rw attributes
| +--rw dnPrefix? DistinguishedName
| +--rw userLabel? string
| +--ro locationName? string
| +--ro gNBId? int64
| +--rw pLMNInfoList* [mcc mnc]
| | +--rw mcc Mcc
| | +--rw mnc Mnc
| | +--rw sNSSAIList* [sNssai]
| | +--rw sNssai string
| | +--rw status? string
| | +--rw configData* [configParameter]
| | +--rw configParameter string
| | +--rw configValue? int64

Yang model defines only the pLMNInfoConfiguration.

Key is NEarRTRICid

Suggested CPS-Query: get lis elements with children where leave has certain value,.

This API will be replaced by AAI APIs

Do we need to discs CPS for this one. IF so which model etc?

This API can be ignored

{
"cellList": [{
"Cell": {
"networkId": "jio",
"nodeId": "Chn1003",
"physicalCellId": 0,
"pnfName": "ncserver1007",
"sectorNumber": 0,
"latitude": "13.081907",
"longitude": "80.270862"
},
"neighbor": [
"Chn1006",
"Chn906",
"Chn1005",
"Chn905"
]
}]
}

{

"pci-value":1

}

{

"ho":false

}

{
  "ho": true,
  "targetCellId": "string"
}

cellId - string

trgetCellId - string

Returns the RAN-schema yang (Refer CPS - 196)