Versions Compared

Old Version 171

changes.mady.by.user Catherine Lefevre

Saved on

compared with

New Version Current

changes.mady.by.user Shuki Yulzari

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Agenda set Sept. 18

...

TOPIC RECOMMENDATIONS


Anchor
TH3
TH3


Amsterdam M4 Code Freeze Milestone Review  

  • Description: M4 Code Freeze Review of all Amsterdam Projects. TSC will vote on the projects and depending on the findings, TSC will need to decide on:

...

Training: On the Importance of adopting Scrum and Estimating

  • Description: Discussion on the benefits of applying Scrum techniques and Poker Planning for Estimating.
    1. Why is Scrum important for the Team. How to apply Scrum for distributed Team
    2. You can't swallow more that you can shew: Estimating with Poker Planning will make the team more realistic.

...

Anchor
M6
M6


Training: On the Importance of adopting Scrum and Estimating 

  • Description: Discussion on the benefits of applying Scrum techniques and Poker Planning for Estimating.
    1. Why is Scrum important for the Team. How to apply Scrum for distributed Team
    2. You can't swallow more that you can shew: Estimating with Poker Planning will make the team more realistic.

...

Beijing Release Calendar Proposal

...

    • Randa Maher (Remote - EST timezone)
    • Michael Lando
    • Becky Hotze (Remote - CT timezone)

Beijing Release Calendar Proposal

External Open Source collaboration (OPNFV, ODL, etc.) and required actions 

Enforcing an "Upstream first" approach to ONAP

External Standards Coordination and required actions with a different SDO 

Anchor
TH11
TH11


External Open Source collaboration (OPNFV, ODL, etc.) and required actions  

Joint Architecture/Usecase subcommittees' meeting 

Joint Architecture/Usecase/Modeling subcommittees' meeting 

Anchor
TH6
TH6


External Standards Coordination and required actions with a different SDO   

ONAP security subcommittees' meeting 

...

Anchor
W3
W3


Joint Architecture/Usecase subcommittees' meeting 

  • Description: Jointly identify key features and requirements exposed by the R2 use case and/or by the release 
  • Topic Leader: Alla Goldner/Chris Donley
  • Volunteer Note Taker: First Last  email
  • Estimated Duration: 2 hours

...

  • Link to data Source (if applicable)
  • Interested to attend:

...

...

...

R2 (Beijing) Architecture

R2 (Beijing) use cases/platform capabilities first presentation to the TSC 

Anchor
W4
W4


Joint Architecture/Usecase/Modeling subcommittees' meeting 

Usecase subcommittee meeting 

Installation hands-on

Kubernetes ONAP deployment overview and hands-on

Anchor
TH10
TH10


ONAP security subcommittees' meeting   

Modeling

Anchor
W5
W5


Operator Perspectives on R2 (Beijing) Architecture 

Residential vCPE Use-Case deep dive

VoLTE Use-Case deep dive

Microservice Bus Tutorial

...

Anchor
W7
W7


R2 (Beijing) use cases/platform capabilities first presentation to the TSC 

  • Description: Outcomes of R2 related discussions
  • Topic Leader: Alla Goldner/Chris Donley
  • Volunteer Note Taker: First Last  email
  • Estimated Duration: 1 hour

...

  • Link to data Source (if applicable)
  • Interested to attend:

...

Introducing CLI Model engine &  Tutorial

  • Description: As part of this session, audience will learn about the CLI model engine capabilities and how to develop ONAP commands using it just by writing YAML file with zero line of code, CLI model engine produce Commands directly from YAML.
  • Topic Leader: user-67d6f
  • Volunteer Note Taker: user-67d6f
  • Estimated Duration: 1h 
  • Link to data Source (if applicable)
  • Interested to attend:

Integration / Testing

...

...

How to use ONAP Community Lab

...

    • Brian Freeman - AT&T (Remote EST)
    • Thinh Nguyenphu
    • Emmanouil Mavrogiorgis- AT&T (Remote EST)
    • Ajay Mahimkar - AT&T (Remote EST)
    • Waseem Qaraguli - Amdocs (Remote - EDT)
    • Gil Bullard - AT&T (Remote EST)
    • Sergio Pozo - Vodafone
    • Luman Wang  -ChinaTelecom?Remote?
    • xiangyang yuan - China Mobile
    • Qinghua Yang - Huawei
    • Andrew Baxter - Amdocs
    • Cheng (Ian) Liu - Huawei (Remote - US CT)
    • Kranthi Kiran Guttikonda - B-Yond

Anchor
TH15
TH15


Usecase subcommittee meeting  

  • Description: R2 desired ONAP Platform capabilities and use cases to show those capabilities 
  • Topic Leader: Alla Goldner

...

  • Volunteer Note Taker: First Last  email
  • Estimated Duration:

...

  • 2 hours
  • Link to data Source (if applicable)
  • Interested to attend:


      Installation hands-on

      • Description: Sharing on ONAP installation

      R2: Non-functional requirements proposals 

      ONAP Development Tutorial

      ...

      ...

      LF Productivity and Process Town Hall Session

      ...

      Anchor
      M8
      M8


      Kubernetes ONAP deployment overview and hands-on  

      • Description: Overview and Demo of ONAP deployment on Kubernetes done in OOM project.
      • Topic Leader: Borislav Glozman
      • Volunteer Note Taker: First Last  email
      • Estimated Duration: 2h 
      • Link to data Source (if applicable)

      ...

      • Interested to attend:
        • Gildas Lanilis

      ...

      ...

      Documentation: how to describe detailed call flows 

      • Description: To undestrand the various ONAP component inteactio, call flows description are very impôrtant. They are currenly used in various projects  and use-cases. Various tools are used to describe call flows with various levels of details. This session will present a way to describe some detailed call flows with API calls between various components using PlantUML.
      • Date: TBD
      • Topic Leader: Eric Debeau - Orange
      • Volunteer Note Taker: 
      • Estimated Duration: 30'
      • Interested to attend:

      Future Plan for the Development of Holmes

      • Description:  The basic analysis capability of Holmes will be available by R1. We want to discuss how to enhance the functionalities to make Holmes be able to support more use cases and scenarios. Besides, we want to have a brief introduction on the vision of a smarter and more general analysis application based on the big data components provided by the ONAP community. 
      • Topic Leader: Guangrong Fu
      • Volunteer Note Taker: First Last email
      • Estimated Duration: 1hr
      • Interested to attend:

      End-to-End Model Driven VNF Lifecycle Management/Modeling

      ...

      Anchor
      TH2
      TH2


      Modeling 

      ...

      ...

        • Alex Vul
        • Hui Deng

      ...

      ...

      ...

      ...

      ...

      ...

      ...

      Enhancing ONAP to orchestrate container VNFs using container orchestration as VIMs

      • Description: Release 1 ONAP instantiates VNFs as VMs in compute farm using VIMs such as Openstack which manages VM. Increasing VNF density on each node, need for multiple networks/slices, Services using SFC and reduced bringup & network latency requirements in market such as 5G and vCPE  are driving container based VNFs.  This project proposal is to enhance ONAP to support VNFs as containers in addition to VNFs as VMs by container orchestration as VIM instead of VM manager like openstack.
        • Objective/Outcome desired:
          • Get consensus on crawl/walk/run direction.
          • Get agreement on K8S as container VIM in R2
          • Get feedback on proposed architecture and changes to various ONAP projects.
          • Get an understanding that VNFs as container is needed for ONAP R-2 use cases(5G-RAN and vCPE)

      ...

      Anchor
      T2
      T2


      Residential vCPE Use-Case deep dive 


      VoLTE Use-Case deep dive 

      Anchor
      M2
      M2


      Microservice Bus Tutorial 

      Anchor
      M3
      M3


      Introducing CLI Model engine &  Tutorial 

      • Description: As part of this session, audience will learn about the CLI model engine capabilities and how to develop ONAP commands using it just by writing YAML file with zero line of code, CLI model engine produce Commands directly from YAML.
      • Topic Leader: user-67d6f
      • Volunteer Note Taker: user-67d6f
      • Estimated Duration: 1h 
      • Link to data Source (if applicable)
      • Interested to attend:

      Anchor
      T1
      T1


      Integration / Testing 

      • Description: This session will give an overview of ONAP status from Integrtaion / Testing point of view:
        1. ntegration testing process and its status:
          1. UT
          2. CSIT
          3. Integration lab, this includes pair testing rules for each project, this includes a brief on how to use the lab in general, Stephen and Yang will give details later
          4. End to End lab status overview for vCPE, VoLTE  (deep dive will be covered in another two sessions) and vFW / vDNS
          5. Integration deployment strategy for Amsterdam: assets requirement and deployment topology, quick review of how to use heat template to deploy ONAP in Integration lab
        2. Integration testing practice and results from Orange open lab

      Anchor
      M4
      M4


      How to use ONAP Community Lab 

      Anchor
      W2
      W2


      R2: Non-functional requirements proposals  

      Anchor
      M1
      M1


      ONAP Development Tutorial 

      Anchor
      T8
      T8


      Control Loop - E2E 

      Anchor
      M5
      M5


      LF Productivity and Process Town Hall Session  

      • Description:  Everyone has their favorite tool they want to use to work and communicate more efficiently.   The LF IT Department gets requests to add new tools or functiuonaluty on an almost daily basis, but accomodating all of these isn't feasable.  We need a more complete strategy for supporting your needs and this Monday session is intended to gather community input and share ideas on what is working well and can be improved upon in the area of tools and processes.  NOTE: This is not a technical "how-to" session.
      • Topic Leader:Kenny Paul  Tech. Program Manager, The Linux Foundation
      • Volunteer Note Taker: First Last email
      • Estimated Duration: 1hr
      • Interested to attend:

      Anchor
      M7
      M7


      Documentation: how to describe detailed call flows 

      • Description: To undestrand the various ONAP component inteactio, call flows description are very impôrtant. They are currenly used in various projects  and use-cases. Various tools are used to describe call flows with various levels of details. This session will present a way to describe some detailed call flows with API calls between various components using PlantUML.
      • Date: TBD
      • Topic Leader: Eric Debeau - Orange
      • Volunteer Note Taker: 
      • Estimated Duration: 30'
      • Interested to attend:

      Anchor
      TH12
      TH12


      Future Plan for the Development of Holmes 

      • Description:  The basic analysis capability of Holmes will be available by R1. We want to discuss how to enhance the functionalities to make Holmes be able to support more use cases and scenarios. Besides, we want to have a brief introduction on the vision of a smarter and more general analysis application based on the big data components provided by the ONAP community. 
      • Topic Leader: Guangrong Fu
      • Volunteer Note Taker: First Last email
      • Estimated Duration: 1hr
      • Interested to attend:

      VoLTE E2E Service Design Demo

      • Description:  David Shadmi from SDC team gave a small group people a demo of VoLTE E2E service design by using early version of SDC, it was very helpful. We would like to see the same demo with the latest SDC code and bigger audience to get the feedback.  
      • Topic Leader: David Shadmi
      • Volunteer Note Taker: Yang Xu
      • Estimated Duration: 1hr
      • Interested to attend:

      Anchor
      TH1
      TH1


      End-to-End Model Driven VNF Lifecycle Management/Modeling 

      • Description: As part of the VNF SDK project, VNF modeling subproject has been focusing on establishing a consistent end-to-end approach for VNF and VNF package modeling in R2. We have identified several starting point for standardization of these models. What we need to do next is to agree on what models and/or standards are going to be applicable at what stages of the VNF lifecycle.

        We will start with the VNF model, as it is seen by VNF developers, inclusive of compute/storage/network hardware requirements, telemetry and policy specification, and identified how this information is ingested and trasformed into other models as part as part of VNF on-boarding (SDC), instantiation (SO/VF-C/Optimization/Policy) and operation (APPC/VFC/Optimization/Policy).

        We will also need to understand how policies and telemetry apply across the VNF management lifecycle, at what point they are defined, who gets to define them and how they are blended/federated with policies already provided during VNF on-boarding.

      Anchor
      T9
      T9


      Enhancing ONAP to orchestrate container VNFs using container orchestration as VIMs 

      • Description: Release 1 ONAP instantiates VNFs as VMs in compute farm using VIMs such as Openstack which manages VM. Increasing VNF density on each node, need for multiple networks/slices, Services using SFC and reduced bringup & network latency requirements in market such as 5G and vCPE  are driving container based VNFs.  This project proposal is to enhance ONAP to support VNFs as containers in addition to VNFs as VMs by container orchestration as VIM instead of VM manager like openstack.
        • Objective/Outcome desired:
          • Get consensus on crawl/walk/run direction.
          • Get agreement on K8S as container VIM in R2
          • Get feedback on proposed architecture and changes to various ONAP projects.
          • Get an understanding that VNFs as container is needed for ONAP R-2 use cases(5G-RAN and vCPE)

      Anchor
      TH9
      TH9


      DCAE New Features and Enhancements for Beijing and Future Releases 

      Anchor
      TH13
      TH13


      SDC: R2 Backlog Discussion 

      Anchor
      TH8
      TH8


      VID: R2 Backlog Discussion  

      • Description: Presenting and further gathering of R2 candidate requirements
      • Topic Leader: David Shadmi 
      • Volunteer Note Taker: 
      • Estimated Duration: 1 hours
      • Link to data Source (if applicable)
      • Interested to attend:

      Anchor
      TH44
      TH44

      AAI: R2 Backlog Discussion  

      • Description: Presenting and further gathering of R2 candidate requirements
      • Topic Leader:Colin Burns
      • Volunteer Note Taker: 
      • Estimated Duration: 1 hours
      • Link to data Source (if applicable)
      • Interested to attend:

      Anchor
      TH14
      TH14

      AAI: Graph DB Evolution 

      • Description: Discuss Beijing plans to move to JanusGraph, migration strategies, etc.
      • Topic Leader: Jimmy Forsyth
      • Volunteer Note Taker: 
      • Estimated Duration: 1 hours
      • Link to data Source (if applicable)
      • Interested to attend:
             

      Anchor
      TH7
      TH7


      Service Orchestration Workflow Development and Testing  

      Anchor
      T10
      T10


      TOSCA Native Service Orchestration Design 

      ...

      • Description: Review of option to integrate TOSCA native orchestration to the SO.  Discussion will cover current (R1) integration of a native TOSCA orchestrator, along with potential future directions and challenges for TOSCA service orchestration in the context of ONAP.
      • Topic Leader: DeWayne Filppi 
      • Volunteer Note Taker: Amir Levy
      • Estimated Duration: 1 hour

      • Link to data Source (if applicable)
      • Interested to attend:

          ...

          Anchor
          TH5
          TH5


          ONAP Modeling: long-term strategy vs short-term tactics  


          • Description: Discuss goals, challenges and approaches to define an ONAP modeling long-term strategy (R2 and beyond), with the emphasis on E2E service automation, in sync with long-term architecture and driven by ONAP Service Provider requirements, and the short-term tactics (R2) in support of the long-term strategy; consider requirements, architecture, info models, data models, and DSLs in this order, and discuss the landscape of standards and open source communities contributing to them. Make specific long-term strategic, as well as specific short-term tactical recommendations for ONAP and other SDOs/open source communities.
          • Topic Leader: Michael Brenner, Cloudify, michael@cloudify.co
          • Volunteer Note Taker: First Last  email
          • Estimated Duration: 1.5 hrs

          DCAE New Features and Enhancements for Beijing and Future Releases

          SDC: R2 Backlog Discussion

          • Description: Presenting and further gathering of R2 candidate requirements
          • Topic Leader: David Shadmi / Michael Lando
          • Volunteer Note Taker: 
          • Estimated Duration: 2 hours
          • Link to data Source (if applicable)
          • Interested to attend:

          VID: R2 Backlog Discussion

          • Description: Presenting and further gathering of R2 candidate requirements
          • Topic Leader: David Shadmi 
          • Volunteer Note Taker: 
          • Estimated Duration: 1 hours
          • Link to data Source (if applicable)
          • Interested to attend:

          AAI: Graph DB Evolution

          • Description: Discuss Beijing plans to move to JanusGraph, migration strategies, etc.
          • Topic Leader: Jimmy Forsyth
          • Volunteer Note Taker: 
          • Estimated Duration: 1 hours
          • Link to data Source (if applicable)
          • Interested to attend:
                 

          Service Orchestration Workflow Development and Testing

          TOSCA Native Service Orchestration Design

          • Description: Review of option to integrate TOSCA native orchestration to the SO.  Discussion will cover current (R1) integration of a native TOSCA orchestrator, along with potential future directions and challenges for TOSCA service orchestration in the context of ONAP.
          • Topic Leader: DeWayne Filppi 
          • Volunteer Note Taker: Amir Levy
          • Estimated Duration: 1 hour
          • Link to data Source (if applicable)
          • Interested to attend:

          ONAP Modeling: long-term strategy vs short-term tactics

          • Description: Discuss goals, challenges and approaches to define an ONAP modeling long-term strategy (R2 and beyond), with the emphasis on E2E service automation, in sync with long-term architecture and driven by ONAP Service Provider requirements, and the short-term tactics (R2) in support of the long-term strategy; consider requirements, architecture, info models, data models, and DSLs in this order, and discuss the landscape of standards and open source communities contributing to them. Make specific long-term strategic, as well as specific short-term tactical recommendations for ONAP and other SDOs/open source communities.
          • Topic Leader: Michael Brenner, Cloudify, michael@cloudify.co
          • Volunteer Note Taker: First Last  email
          • Estimated Duration: 1.5 hrs
          • Link to data Source (if applicable)
          • Interested to attend:

          Workshop Title: ONAP Multi Cloud Architectural vision for R2 and beyond

          Goal:                               Advance Multi Cloud beyond the current proxy implementation to address ONAP platform level issues across all use cases

          Moderator(s):                 VMware, Wind River

          Primary Contact:           Ramki Krishnan, VMware, ramkik@vmware.com

          Desired Scheduling:     After lunch scheduling is desired since some folks may not be able to attend in person. 

          Interested in Attending:

          • Vimal Begwani - AT&T
          • Margaret Chiosi - Huawei
          • Sastry Isukapalli - AT&T
          • Ankitkumar Patel - AT&T
          • Danny Lin - VMware
          • Sumit Verdi - VMware
          • Xinhui Li - VMware
          • Bin Hu - AT&T
          • Gil Hellmann - Wind River
          • Sarat Puthenputa - AT&T
          • Shankaranarayanan Puzhavakath Narayanan - AT&T
          • Jing Wang - Huawei
          • Isaku Yamahata - Intel
          • Alex Vul - Intel
          • Rajesh Gadiyar - Intel
          • Srinivasa Addepalli - Intel
          • Bin Yang - Wind River
          • Chuanyu Chen - Huawei
          • David Shadmi - AT&T

          • Ramesh Tammana - VMware

          • Gaurav Gupta - VMware

          ...

          Pam Dragosh - AT&T

          ...

          Kang Xi - Huawei

          ...

          Alla Goldner - Amdocs

          ...

          Chengli Wang - China Mobile

          ...

          Workshop Title: ONAP Multi Cloud Architectural vision for R2 and beyond

          Goal:                               Advance Multi Cloud beyond the current proxy implementation to address ONAP platform level issues across all use cases

          Workshop Lead:            VMware

          Primary Contact:           Ramki Krishnan, VMware, ramkik@vmware.com

          Estimated Duration:      3 hrs.

          Desired Scheduling:     Before Architecture and TSC meetings. After lunch scheduling is desired since some folks are connecting from US and may not be able to attend in person. 

          Interested in Attending:

          Slides: ONAP-mc-workshop-agenda.pdf

          Minutes on Multi-Cloud follow up and R2 scope discussion (09/28/2017): Multi-Cloud follow up and R2 discussion.pdf

          Anchor
          T4
          T4

          Subtopic 1:   Multi-Cloud Architectural Vision Introduction 

          Description:   This session will focus on discussion of the evolution of the Multi-Cloud framework for R2 and beyond, to address some of the platform gaps and move towards a more extensible and consistent cloud mediation layer. We would like to introduce a few key focus areas for this evolution, both in term of the use cases, architectural design principles, and integrations.

          Architectural focus: Model Driven API for cloud infrastructure, Standardized cloud telemetry management, and policy driven cloud agnostic deployment.

          Deep-dive subtopics (2, 3 and 4) towards achieving this vision are listed below for convenience

          • Performance & Isolation - "Towards a performance-aware and portable cloud-agnostic Infrastructure"
          • SDN - "Architectural options for Multi-vendor SDN Controller and Multi Cloud Deployments in a DC"
          • FCAPS Telemetry - "Standardized Infrastructure class statistics Model" 

          Suggested Audience:      ONAP-OF, OOM, SDN-C, SO, VF-C, APP-C, DMaaP

          Estimated Duration:        1.5 hrs

          Subtopic Lead:                 VMware

          Presenters:                       AT&T, VMware, Wind River, Intel

          Slides:                               ONAP-mc-intro.pdf

          Anchor
          T5
          T5


          Subtopic 2: Performance & Isolation - "Towards a performance-aware and portable cloud-agnostic Infrastructure" 

          Description:                    Multi-vendor cloud portability and interoperability while delivering performance is a mandatory feature of distributed DC deployments. The practical challenge in achieving this goal is the lack of standardization of Platform-aware and QoS features, for example extra specs in OpenStack, which results in a vertically integrated solution. This session will focus on how Multi Cloud can offer policy standardization and translation as a microservice for platform-aware and QoS features (hard-guarantee, min-guarantee, best effort etc.) for addressing this challenge and how NFV application classes such as IMS/EPC Control/Data Plane can benefit from this framework.

          Suggested Audience:     VNF Requirements/Modelling, A&AI, Policy

          ...

          Topic 1:   Multi-Cloud Architectural Vision Introduction

          Description:   This session will focus on discussion of the evolution of the Multi-Cloud framework for R2 and beyond, to address some of the platform gaps and move towards a more extensible and consistent cloud mediation layer. We would like to introduce a few key focus areas for this evolution, both in term of the use cases, architectural design principles, and integrations.

          Architectural focus: Model Driven API for cloud infrastructure, Standardized cloud telemetry management, and policy driven cloud agnostic deployment.

          Deep-dive topics (2, 3 and 4) towards achieving this vision are listed below for convenience

          • Standardized Infrastructure class statistics Model
          • Towards a performance-aware and portable cloud-agnostic infrastructure
          • Architectural options for Multi-vendor SDN Controller and Multi Cloud Deployments in a DC

          Suggested Audience:     ONAP-OF, OOM, SDN-C, SO, VF-C, APP-C, DMaaPSDC

          Estimated Duration:         2 .5 hrs.Desired Scheduling

          Subtopic Lead:         Before topics 2, 3, 4, Architecture and TSC meetings.

          Topic Lead               :       VMware

          Interested in Attending:

          Topic 2:   Standardized Infrastructure Class statistics Model

                 Bin Yang, Wind River, bin.yang@windriver.com 

          Presenters:                      Wind River, Intel

          SlidesDescription:                  This session will focus on a hierarchical cloud-platform-aware architectural framework with separation of collection, storage, processing functions and real-time vs historical analytics components. In this framework, Multi Cloud will deliver a standardized infrastructure class statistics model for driving ONAP component/VNF placement/change management across distributed DC multi cloud instances through ONAP-OF, DCAE and other components. The benefit to ONAP platform, across all use cases, will be delivering the best performance and security while minimizing cost            ONAP-mc-performance-isolation.pdf

          Anchor
          T6
          T6

          Subtopic 3:  SDN - "Architectural options for Multi-vendor SDN Controller and Multi Cloud Deployments in a DC" 

          Description:                    Multi-vendor components in a DC including underlay, overlay, gateway and SDN Controllers for the same pose various architectural challenges in terms interoperability, security etc. This session will focus on an in depth analysis of the architectural options including related efforts such as OpenStack Gluon. This proposal also addresses communication latency-bound multi-side physical DCs which can be treated as a single virtual DC for management purposes.

          Suggested Audience:     ONAP SDN-OFC, DCAE, A&AI, Policy, OOM, SDN-C, DMaaPSO, VF-C, APP-C, SDC, OOM

          Estimated Duration:        1 .5 hrs.Desired Scheduling:

          Subtopic Lead:             After Topic 1 and Before Architecture and TSC meetings.Topic Lead               :       AT  AT&T

          Presenters:               :       VMware, Wind River, AT&T, Intel

          Interested in Attending:

          Topic 3:  Towards a performance-aware and portable cloud-agnostic infrastructure

          , Huawei, VMware

          Slides:                             ONAP-mc-sdn.pdf

          Anchor
          T7
          T7

          Subtopic 4:   FCAPS Telemetry - "Standardized Infrastructure Class statistics Model" 

          Description: Description:                    Multi-vendor cloud portability and interoperability while delivering performance is a mandatory feature of distributed DC deployments. The practical challenge in achieving this goal is the lack of standardization of Platform-aware and QoS features, for example extra specs in OpenStack, which results in a vertically integrated solution.     This session will focus on how Multi Cloud can offer policy standardization and translation as a microservice for a hierarchical cloud-platform-aware and QoS features (hard-guarantee, min-guarantee, best effort etc.) for addressing this challenge and how NFV application classes such as IMS/EPC Control/Data Plane can benefit from this frameworkarchitectural framework with separation of collection, storage, processing functions and real-time vs historical analytics components. In this framework, Multi Cloud will deliver a standardized infrastructure class statistics model for driving ONAP component/VNF placement/change management across distributed DC multi cloud instances through ONAP-OF, DCAE and other components. The benefit to ONAP platform, across all use cases, will be delivering the best performance and security while minimizing cost.

          Suggested Audience:    VNF Requirements/Modelling   ONAP-OF, DCAE, A&AI, Policy, SOOOM, VF-C, APP-C, SDC

          Estimated Duration:       1 hrs.

          Desired Scheduling:      After Topic 1 and Before Architecture and TSC meetings.

          Topic Lead               :      Bin Yang, Wind River, bin.yang@windriver.com 

          Presenters               :      Wind River, Intel, VMware (to confirm)

          Interested in Attending:

          Topic 4:   Architectural options for Multi-vendor SDN Controller and Multi Cloud Deployments in a DC

          Description:                    Multi-vendor components in a DC including underlay, overlay, gateway and SDN Controllers for the same pose various architectural challenges in terms interoperability, security etc. This session will focus on an in depth analysis of the architectural options including related efforts such as OpenStack Gluon. This proposal also addresses communication latency-bound multi-side physical DCs which can be treated as a single virtual DC for management purposes.

          Suggested Audience:    SDN-C, SO, VF-C, APP-C, SDC, OOM

          Estimated Duration:       1 hrs.

          Desired Scheduling:      After Topic 1 and Before Architecture and TSC meetings.

          Topic Lead               :      VMware

          Presenters               :      Huawei, AT&T (to confirm), VMware, Intel

          Interested in Attending:

          Topic 5:   Kubernetes vs Dockers Swarm supporting ONAP-OOM on multi-cloud multi-stack environment

          Description:  ONAP was set originally to support multiple container platform and cloud through TOSCA. In R1 ONAP and OOM is dependent completely on Kubernetes. As there are other container platforms such as Docker Swarm that are gaining more wider adoption as a simple alternative to Kubernetes. In addition operator may need the flexibility to choose their own container platform and be open for future platform. We need to weight the alternatives and avoid using package managers as Helm that makes K8s mandatory.

          The use of TOSCA in conjunction with Kubernetes provides that "happy medium" where on one hand we can leverage Kubernetes to a full extent while at the same time be open to other alternative. In this workshop, we will compare Kubernetes with Docker Swarm and walk through an example of how ONAP can be set to support both platforms using TOSCA.

                      

          SDN-C, DMaaP

          Estimated Duration:        .5 hrs.

          Subtopic Lead:                 AT&T

          Presenters:                       VMware, Wind River, AT&T, Intel

          Slides: ONAP-mc-fcaps.pdf

          Anchor
          TH4
          TH4

          Kubernetes vs Dockers Swarm supporting ONAP-OOM on multi-cloud multi-stack environment 

          Description:  ONAP was set originally to support multiple container platform and cloud through TOSCA. In R1 ONAP and OOM is dependent completely on Kubernetes. As there are other container platforms such as Docker Swarm that are gaining more wider adoption as a simple alternative to Kubernetes. In addition operator may need the flexibility to choose their own container platform and be open for future platform. We need to weight the alternatives and avoid using package managers as Helm that makes K8s mandatory.

          The use of TOSCA in conjunction with Kubernetes provides that "happy medium" where on one hand we can leverage Kubernetes to a full extent while at the same time be open to other alternative. In this workshop, we will compare Kubernetes with Docker Swarm and walk through an example of how ONAP can be set to support both platforms using TOSCA.

                      

          Suggested Audience:    SDN-C, SO, VF-C, APP-C, SDC, OOM

          Estimated Duration:       1 hrs.

          Desired Scheduling:      Before Architecture and TSC meetings.

          Topic Lead               :      Cloudify

          Presenters               :      Cloudify, AT&T (to confirm)

          Interested in Attending:

          SLIDES 

          Amsterdam Release Lesson Learned

          Description:  The purpose of this topic is to share preliminary Amsterdam Release Lesson Learned, to reflect together on how everything went and then to decide what changes we want to make in the next ONAP release (i.e. Beijing), answering the following questions:

          • What worked well?
          • What did not work well?
          • What actions can we take to improve our process going forward?

          Suggested Audience:    Anyone but ONAP Release Manager and PTLs are expectedSuggested Audience:    SDN-C, SO, VF-C, APP-C, SDC, OOM

          Estimated Duration:       1 hrs.

          Desired Scheduling:        After Topic 1 and Before Architecture and TSC meetings.

          Topic Lead               :      Cloudify

          Presenters               :      Cloudify, AT&T (to confirm)

          Interested in Attending:

          Topic 6:   Amsterdam Release Lesson Learned

          Description:  The purpose of this topic is to share preliminary Amsterdam Release Lesson Learned, to reflect together on how everything went and then to decide what changes we want to make in the next ONAP release (i.e. Beijing), answering the following questions:

          • What worked well?
          • What did not work well?
          • What actions can we take to improve our process going forward?

          Suggested Audience:    Anyone but ONAP Release Manager and PTLs are expected

          Estimated Duration:       1 hrs.

          Desired Scheduling:      No preference

          Topic Leader:     Catherine Lefèvre (AT&T)

          Volunteer Note Taker: Gervais-Martial Ngueko (AT&T)

          Interested in Attending:

           No preference

          Topic Leader:     Catherine Lefèvre (AT&T)

          Volunteer Note Taker: Gervais-Martial Ngueko (AT&T)

          Interested in Attending:



          VID: R2 Backlog Discussion  

          • Description: Presenting and further gathering of R2 candidate requirements
          • Topic Leader: David Shadmi 
          • Volunteer Note Taker: 
          • Estimated Duration: 1 hours
          • Link to data Source (if applicable)
          • Interested to attend:

          ...