...
| Practice Area | Checkpoint | Yes/No | Evidences | How to? | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product Management | Have all JIRA Stories supporting the release use case been implemented? | Yes |
| |||||||||||
| List the Stories that will not be implemented in this current Release. | Yes |
| ||||||||||||
| Are committed Sprint Backlog Stories been coded and marked as "Closed" in Jira? | Yes |
| ||||||||||||
| Are all tasks associated with committed Sprint Backlog Stories been marked as "Closed" in Jira? | Yes |
| ||||||||||||
| Release Management | Have all issues pertaining to FOSS been addressed? | Yes | ||||||||||||
| Have all findings from previous milestones been addressed? | Yes | No specific findings | For M2 and M3 Milestones, ensure all findings have been closed. | |||||||||||
Has the Project Team reviewed and understood the most recent license scan reports from the LF, for both (a) licenses within the codebase and (b) licenses for third-party build time dependencies? | Yes | |||||||||||||
| For both (a) and (b), have all high priority non-Project Licenses been either removed or escalated as likely exception requests? | Yes | Nexus IQ report | ||||||||||||
| Development | Are all Defects of priority Highest and High in status "Closed" in Jira? | Yes |
| |||||||||||
| Has the project team reach the Automated Unit Test Code Coverage expectation? (Refer to artifacts available in Sonar) | Yes | Goal: 50% for Incubation project in Beijing | For evidences, provide link(s) to Gerrit repos by providing the URL as shown in this example | |||||||||||
| Is there any binaries (jar, war, tar, gz, gzip, zip files) in Gerrit project repository? | No | Refer to CI Development Best Practices | ||||||||||||
| Is there any pending commit request older than 36 hours in Gerrit? | No | |||||||||||||
| Provide the "% Achived" on the CII Best Practices program. | 98% |
| As documented in CII Badging Program, teams have to fill out CII Best Practices | |||||||||||
Is there any Critical and Severe level security vulnerabilities older than 60 days old in the third party libraries used within your project unaddressed? Nexus-IQ classifies level as the following:
which is complaint with CVSS V2.0 rating. | Yes | In the case critical known vulnerability are still showing in the report, fill out the Security Vulnerability Threat Template in your project. | Ensure the Nexus-IQ report from “Jenkins CLM” shows 0 critical security vulnerability. Open the Nexus-IQ report for the details on each repo. | |||||||||||
| Are all the Jenkins jobs successfully passed (verify + merge jobs)? | Yes | CLAMP jenkins tab | ||||||||||||
| Have all OOM Staging Healtcheck related to your project passed? | Yes | |||||||||||||
| Are all snapshot binaries available in Nexus-staging? | Yes | Provide link to clamp Nexus | ||||||||||||
| Do you have a clear plan to implement the Independent Versioning and Release Process by RC0? | Yes | Contact the upstream teams to make sure they will release their artifacts (in Nexus Release repo) so you can build by depending on these released artifacts by RC0. | ||||||||||||
| Integration and Testing | Have 100% of Continuous System Integration Testing (CSIT) Use Cases been implemented successfully in Jenkins? | Yes | Jenkins CLAMP tab | |||||||||||
| Is there a Docker images available for your project deliverable? | Yes | Nexus 3 clamp docker repo | ||||||||||||
| Has the project code successfully passed the Daily Build process? | Yes | Jenkins CLAMP tab | Goal is to ensure the latest project commit has not broken the Integration Daily Build | |||||||||||
| Doc | Has the team created a docs folder and Development and Release Notes documentation templates in Readthedocs? | Yes | CLAMP readthedocs link | |||||||||||
| Is the API documentation section populated? | Yes | CLAMP documentation | API doc included in Online doc Note that CLAMP is now integrated with SWAGGER and MSB |
...