Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  • Responsibility: Runs config assign via CDS
  • Currently implemented in ConfigurePnfResource.bpmn


SO PNF PNP migration is being documented: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/PNF+PnP+workflow+migration+to+Building+Blocks

The JIRA to track progress: https://jira.onap.org/browse/SO-2556.

Lukasz Grech and Lukasz Muszkieta (Nokia) are leading the SO changes related to migration of PNF PnP sub-flows (sub-Processes_ to building blocks.

This link is about the current (Dublin + El Alto) implementation: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/PNF+PNP+workflow+-+current+implementation

The SO BPMN code can be found at CreateAndActivatePnfResource.bpmn.
This is where the implementation is stored today.

Also refer to the following topic in Gerrit: pnf_bb

https://gerrit.onap.org/r/#/q/status:merged+project:so+branch:master+topic:pnf_bb

This is where other changes expected for the PNF PnP BBs are expected to be added.

A few building blocks will be created in R6 (expected by end of February 2020).

The currently available workflows dealing for PNF PnP can be seen at the PNF PnP test-cases descriptions in the ONAP Integration project.

VID IMPACTS

R6 ITEMDESCRIPTION
VID1 Migration of Sub-worksflows

Migration of existing PNF PnP sub-workflows to a new BB approach (probably we will be creating 4-5 new BBs).

VID Impact:

Within “old” VID macro orchestration pages, a special field to provide a pnf-id parameter (shall be actually called “correlationID” or “PNF correlationID”) has been displayed under the following conditions:

  1. Service Model contains a PNF resource type.

When we migrate to BB approach, we`d keep the possibility to provide this parameter (PNF correlationID) to the SO API call as input.

How this will change with SO/BB approach, and with new VID GUI targeted at macro (GR) flows – we`d see exactly, after we execute some tests with new VID UI, and updated SO PNF BB code.
We`d have to check, what capabilities and conditions could be applied to display and process this “PNF Correlation ID parameter”.

Can the same BBs could be re-used in “standard” vCPE use-case.
We`re looking at a generic solution, and we`d probably display this additional field, when we figure out, that there is a PNF resource used in a Service Model.

...