You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 21 Next »

*** PROPOSAL FOR DISCUSSION ***

Target

Increase transparency on software modules (repositories) included in an ONAP release to enable effective and efficient ...

  • security management
    • (warning) ONAP must not depend on unmaintained software modules / projects
  • release management
  • documentation management

Provide reliable information for all stakeholder ...

  • which software module (repository) is included (was used to build the docker container)
  • which version of the software module is included (was used to build the docker container)

Improve the lifecycle management of software modules / projects.

Current Situation

  • A deployable ONAP release consists of 'maintained' an 'unmaintained' software modules (used to build the docker container).
  • Unmaintained, but deployed projects (not repositories!) of the 'Istanbul' release are:
    • Application Authorization Framework AAF
    • Application Controller APPC
    • External API
    • External System Register ESR
    • Logging
    • MUSIC
    • Portal
    • Virtual Infrastructure Deployment VID
  • Only 'projects' are managed in the release process
  • But a 'project' consists of 1-n repositories. Repositories are not managed in the release process.
    • If a project is (un)maintained, are all repositories (un)maintained?
  • Only 'maintained' projects are managed in the release process.
  • But "unmaintained" software modules (docker container) are added to the list of deployed software modules in the end of the release process (oom)
  • The management of 'release participation' is limited (projects, not repositories), distributed (relmgr, oom, sec, doc) and is not done in a collaborative, end-to-end manner
  • Information about the lifecycle state of projects and repositories and their release participation is distributed, manually maintained and not in sync (GIT:active|readonly, INFO.YAML, WIKI:release participation, WIKI:project lifecycle state, WIKI:documentation, ...)

Proposal

The information about software modules included in an ONAP release must be managed ...

  • from the start of the release process (planning phase)
  • to the end of the release process
    • building the deployable release
    • building the release specific documentation
  • consistently (one single source) for all stakeholder (rel mgr, projects, oom, sec, doc, ...)
  • with a high grade of automation

To participate in a ONAP release, a software module ...

  • must be in the 'maintained' state
  • must have created a release branch
  • must have updated their documentation to reflect the current state of development
  • must have up-to-date release notes (on sub-project level or in main project)

Stakeholders (relmgr, oom, sec, doc) are only using/managing maintained software components / projects.

The release process ensures the compliance and provides appropriate means to check and react in a timely manner. 

Additional Information

Excel Spreadsheet

onap_tables_211108_master_istanbul_updates_only.xlsx

conf.py (istanbul) showing the current situation for documentation

  • No labels