- Lab status
- Istanbul
- results not bad. Remaining test errors due to DCAE changes but a patch is in gate - no results due to error below.
- The Makupsafe issue (jinja2 upstream dependency) is also responsible for the istanbul k8s installation issue
- Master
- deployment OK but all smoke tests failing due to Makupsafe
- pb Markupsafe lib:
- ugly test merged...https://gerrit.onap.org/r/c/integration/xtesting/+/127250 => tests shall be run on Master tomorrow (does not fix the istanbulinstallation issue)
- I tried a cleaner way (https://gitlab.com/Orange-OpenSource/lfn/onap/python-onapsdk/-/merge_requests/334) but all tests are failing...wait for Michał Jagiełło comeback to check the issue and be sure to do thing properly on SDK versioning
- ugly test merged...https://gerrit.onap.org/r/c/integration/xtesting/+/127250 => tests shall be run on Master tomorrow (does not fix the istanbulinstallation issue)
- Istanbul
- jakarta tests
- 5G Slicing automation follow up
- All patches of Maciej Lisowski merged
- Question from Ahila P on simulators sent by mail. For the moment 2 of the 3 simulators are in the wiki. Action morgan push simu to the repo (the repo already exists)
- kubescape => demo next week
- Load test on AAI (using gatling) => action Morgan Richomme resync Michał Jagiełło /William Reehil / Christophe AUZIZEAU
- kafka (testing refactoring) => Refactoring of tests due to kafka refactoring, answer sent by mail to Fiachra Corcoran
- 5G Slicing automation follow up
- Misc
- Morgan Richomme and Sylvain Desbureaux are stepping down
- end of contributions: end of March 2022
- end of Orange platform: end of Jakarta release (with minimal support)
- Azure / NH won't be touched (gating will work, staging, ...) but resources to be identified to manage them...
- Morgan Richomme and Sylvain Desbureaux are stepping down
- Lab status
- user-98b79 http://scancode.onap.eu/
- logging currently using GitHub account (consider using LF ID)
- needs to be discussed with seccom where the scan policies should be stored
- prepare a demo with two Integration projects:
- integration/docker/onap-java11 · Gerrit Code Review
- integration/docker/onap-python · Gerrit Code ReviewAdd images into scancode during
docker-verify
Jenkis job and run pipeline for them. We could analyse results and present that during one of the incoming PTL meetings
- INT-2021 - Automate 5G Slicing use case in CI OTWARTY update
- Create a demo · Gerrit Code Review (onap.org) repo directory to keep there scripts and migrate Manual Configurations - Developer Wiki - Confluence (onap.org) into markdown files there to be able to keep history and review changes
- Lab status
- Orange lab down
- DT still down
- Gating is OK, but since today some A&AI issues observed
- basic_cnf_macro test
- E2E network slicing use case
- INT-2064 - Automate 5G Slicing use case in CI - Manual configuration step 1 - SDC OTWARTY
- INT-2065 - Automate 5G Slicing use case in CI - Manual configuration step 2 - UUI Configuration OTWARTY
- INT-2066 - Automate 5G Slicing use case in CI - Manual configuration step 3 - MSB Configuration OTWARTY
- INT-2067 - Automate 5G Slicing use case in CI - Manual configuration step 4 - SO OTWARTY
- INT-2068 - Automate 5G Slicing use case in CI - Manual configuration step 5 - OOF Configuration OTWARTY
- INT-2069 - Automate 5G Slicing use case in CI - Manual configuration step 6 - Policy Creation Steps OTWARTY
- INT-2070 - Automate 5G Slicing use case in CI - Manual configuration step 7 - AAI Configuration OTWARTY
- INT-2071 - Automate 5G Slicing use case in CI - Manual configuration step 8 - ConfigDB OTWARTY
- INT-2072 - Automate 5G Slicing use case in CI - Manual configuration step 9 - SDNC OTWARTY
- INT-2073 - Automate 5G Slicing use case in CI - prepare a demo repo section OTWARTY
- Ahila P Network slicing automation
- at the beginning Integration team needs to take a look on the first phase: Manual Configurations - Developer Wiki - Confluence (onap.org) - preparing an ONAP for instantiation
- several steps - for sure some missing gaps in ONAP SDK
- There is a plan to create a scenario in pythonsdk-tests repo for that use case
- [INT-2021] Automate 5G Slicing use case in CI - ONAP JIRA ticket which is going to be used to plan a work
- Automate use case 5G Slicing in CI - Developer Wiki - Confluence (onap.org) ← links shared by Ahila P
- at the beginning Integration team needs to take a look on the first phase: Manual Configurations - Developer Wiki - Confluence (onap.org) - preparing an ONAP for instantiation
- List of log4j vulnerability impacted pods in ONAP
Today morning Trivy was ran on ONAP daily master
Pods onap-cli-757c76f546-zfd4m in vulnerable! onap-message-router-0 in vulnerable! onap-sdnrdb-coordinating-only-6f6d6b887b-kzr9x in vulnerable! onap-sdnrdb-master-0 in vulnerable! onap-sdnrdb-master-1 in vulnerable! onap-sdnrdb-master-2 in vulnerable! onap-vfc-huawei-vnfm-driver-57fddd8bc7-nqn7b in vulnerable! onap-vnfsdk-56d9fb886f-sk4s4 in vulnerable! Images: nexus3.onap.org:10001/onap/cli:6.0.1 -> onap-cli-757c76f546-zfd4m nexus3.onap.org:10001/onap/dmaap/dmaap-mr:1.3.0 -> onap-message-router-0 docker.nexus.azure.onap.eu/bitnami/elasticsearch:7.9.3 -> onap-sdnrdb-coordinating-only-6f6d6b887b-kzr9x, onap-sdnrdb-master-X nexus3.onap.org:10001/onap/vfc/nfvo/svnfm/huawei:1.3.9 -> onap-vfc-huawei-vnfm-driver-57fddd8bc7-nqn7b nexus3.onap.org:10001/onap/vnfsdk/refrepo:1.6.3 -> onap-vnfsdk-56d9fb886f-sk4s4
- There are more and more critical issue found, but these are just for cve-2021-44228
- Disable portal tests Krzysztof Kuzmicki
- user-98b79 starts http://scancode.onap.eu/ . Thanks!
- Lab status
- Better results, but due to Nexus restart and no images all tests failed
- cds-resource-resolution is still failing... looks the instance is created before tests is executed
- Integration risks for Jakarta Jakarta Risks - Developer Wiki - Confluence (onap.org)
- Main risks are resources: labs and humans
- Nexus restart https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/23758 should we restart the images creation?
- Yes, after Jenkins and Nexus are back again jobs below need to be rerun
- https://jenkins.onap.org/view/integration/job/integration-xtesting-healthcheck-docker-merge-master/
- https://jenkins.onap.org/view/integration/job/integration-xtesting-security-docker-merge-master/
- https://jenkins.onap.org/view/integration/job/integration-xtesting-infra-healthcheck-docker-merge-master/
- https://jenkins.onap.org/view/integration/job/integration-xtesting-smoke-usecases-pythonsdk-docker-merge-master/
- https://jenkins.onap.org/view/integration/job/integration-xtesting-smoke-usecases-robot-docker-merge-master/
- https://jenkins.onap.org/view/integration/job/integration-xtesting-smoke-usecases-robot-py3-docker-merge-master/
- Yes, after Jenkins and Nexus are back again jobs below need to be rerun
- Nexus doesn't work - tests doesn't work....
- LF ticket created - Theme Extension - Linux Foundation JIRA
- gatig tests works due to Azure cache - images are not downloaded from nexus during each execution
- When it worked we had several tests issues
- needed to check if we don't use same kubeconfig on many tests pipelines
- that can create conflicts because one test tries to create an instance of existing resource
- needed to check if we don't use same kubeconfig on many tests pipelines
- Kubescape tests
- could be useful but won't replace already existing tests
- root pods check based just on the kubernetes resource definition (pod, deployment, statefulset etc.) and not check if the root user is disabled on the image
- could be possible to add them into pipeline soon
- could be useful but won't replace already existing tests
- Azure lab - should we migrate tests there? - discussion
- there are currently 3 Azure labs
- 2 gatings and 1 integration lab with ONAP
- needs to ask TSC if it's possible to add one more to run daily tests - outside of any company infrastructure (currently Orange, Nokia, DT)
- we could run daily on the 1 integration lab machine, but there is a risk we won't have a working lab if during daily execution ONAP creation fails
- there are currently 3 Azure labs
- Migration Integration repos to GitLab?
- it's not required and will take a lot of time and resources, leave it as it is
- scancode.io - user-98b79 back and would work on that
Integration weekly meetings 2021 archives
Integration weekly meeting 2020 archives
Integration weekly meeting 2019 archives
Integration weekly meeting 2018 archives
Integration weekly meeting 2017 archives