You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 18 Next »

General

  1. What does POMBA stand for?
    1. Post Orchestration Model Based Audit

  2. What does the report look like?
    1. See POMBA Reporting
  3. How is POMBA triggered?
    1. In Casablanca, it will be triggered as a result of an end of transaction event being emitted by SO. In addition, it some cases it can manually be triggered from VIM.
  4. Does the POMBA Common Model align to the ONAP Common Model?
    1. We plan to support the ONAP Common Model. The current POMBA Common Model may have some slight differences, but the API is versioned so this will allow us to seamlessly transition to the ONAP Common Model when appropriate.
  5. Is POMBA meant to find software bugs in ONAP?
    1. While that is one of the use cases, it is not the only one. It can also detect if resources outside of ONAP are not behaving as expected, as well as detect changes in services over time that differ from original expectations (with appropriate triggers).
  6. Do you support validation against operational policies?
    1. If these policies are modeled in SDC, then we can audit against them.  Currently we don't support additional operational policy definitions but this could be evaluated.
  7. How does POMBA know the values it is auditing are correct?
    1. It doesn't. POMBA compares different definitions of the resource and reports anomalies.
  8. Why wouldn't I just run some traffic on the service to prove it works?
    1. That is a different test.  A service may be incorrectly instantiated and still carry traffic or be correctly instantiated and not carry traffic.
  9. How do the various components of the solution talk to each other?
    1. They are independent Microservices with well defined REST API.  They communicate with each other via REST, although some parts of the solution allow for publishing events over MSB/DMaaP for other components to consume.

Context Builders

  1. What is a Context Builder?
    1. It is an independent Microservice capable of getting information about a service or service instance from a particular data sources (SDC, SDN-C, A&AI, Network). They each support the same API. See POMBA Context Builders and Data Sources for more information.  This allows POMBA to easily compare the data and generate a report.
  2. How many Context Builders are there?
    1. One for each source of data - SDC, SDN-C, A&AI, Network, etc.
    2. Conceptually, the SDC one is defining a type of service while the others are dealing with service instances.
  3. If I want to add a new source of data, then I need a new Context Builder?
    1. Yes, for ONAP data sources. Note that the Network Discovery Context Builder is meant to handle all primary data sources outside of ONAP.

Network Discovery Context Builder

  1. What do you mean by Network Discovery? Do you really mean Cloud Resources?
    1. Network Discovery may not be the best term, but the idea is to discovery virtual and physical resources involved in providing services in ONAP, as well as their supporting resources.  This will include VNF, VM, physical servers, network both within and between data centres, etc.
  2. Does the POMBA Network Discovery Context Builder support Multi-VIM?
    1. We plan to support Multi-VIM.  Whether this is done in the Casablanca timeframe will depend on the availability of the API
  3. How extensible is the network discovery? How do I support discovering new information or new data sources?
    1. The longer term plan is to have a completely model-driven solution, including self service on-boarding
    2. In Casablanca,  supporting additional parameters will often by updating a configuration file, but new data sources may require a new Microservice.
  4. Can I use Network Discovery without POMBA?
    1. Yes, you could call the Network Discovery Context Builder API directory, or call the underlying Network Discovery API (Network Discovery API Swagger)

Administrivia

  1. Where in ONAP is the POMBA working being done?
    1. The bulk of the work will be done in the Logging project.  The architecture committee has Oked this and the scope change is now in front of the TSC for voting. 
    2. Supporting pieces will also be delivered in SDNC and A&AI (still to be discussed with the A&AI working group).
  2. Is Logging really the best fit for all parts of POMBA?
    1. We need to be able to move forward and make progress somewhere and it is a good enough fit. In the long term, we may want to consider moving additional parts to other projects if it makes sense. For example 
      1. Context Builders moved to be closer to the data they are accessing,
      2. Common third-party tools moved to common place
  • No labels