Work in Progress

Current Issues

Area

Contributor

Issues

Modeling

Review modeling: Access Connectivity / Internet Profile as VNF? Remove remote-ID/CVLAN/SVLAN... from service metadata

AAI/ESR

Lead: ?

Register external controllers via ESR/AAI. Investigate topology discovery considerations

NOT IN FRANKFURT

Service Orchestration

Lead: Huawei?

Custom BPMN workflow that: Reads remote-id/CVLAN/SVLAN from PNF_READY event and not from service attributes stored in AAI Updates service instance metadata accordingly
Inter-workflow calls time out after 60s due to HTTP. This invalidates the 14-day timeout for PNF registration
Service deletion of E2E services with PNF
Remove BBS-event-processor in favor of moving its functionality to Service-Orchestration where it mostly belongs	NOT IN FRANKFURT

Policy

Lead: Huawei?

Migrate current APEX policy for ONT relocation to the new model. This enables the onboarding and activation of BBS policy via REST API

DCAE

Lead: Nokia / Huawei

Define proper namespace for CPE Authentication events	NOT IN FRANKFURT
Remove the RGW MAC validation from BBS-event-processor microservice
Issues with RESTCONF Collector (RCC)	DONE from user-f79d0 : The actual fix DCAEGEN2-1644 https://gerrit.onap.org/r/#/c/dcaegen2/collectors/restconf/+/90759/ But we just can’t cherry pick above one since code changes traced back to below two fixes. So we have to take these too. DCAEGEN2-1587 https://gerrit.onap.org/r/#/c/dcaegen2/collectors/restconf/+/89117/ DCAEGEN2-1511 https://gerrit.onap.org/r/#/c/dcaegen2/collectors/restconf/+/88053/
DCAE service components (RESTCONF Collector & BBS-event-processor) are manually started inside Cloudify platform of DCAE May be mandated by ONAP community to start these via CLAMP and certain Policy related data being injected into them dynamically May be mandated by ONAP community to adhere to some development standards that are now missing For BBS-event-processor also check item 'AAI - Register external controllers via ESR/AAI' above. (not in Frankfurt)

SDN-C

Lead: Nokia

The BBS use case was broken in when the SO team issued a bug fix (SO-1393). The correct SDN-C graph (network-topology-operation) is no longer called (This may imply reviewing BBS modeling). See: https://github.com/onap/so/blob/elalto/bpmn/so-bpmn-infrastructure-common/src/main/groovy/org/onap/so/bpmn/infrastructure/scripts/CreateSDNCNetworkResource.groovy
Reevaluate the SDN-C technical-debt implementation (choosing between Access SDN M&C vendors based on flags found in core DGs)
Develop a BBF WT-411 standards based DG for the Use case in the Access and Edge	STRETCHED FOR FRANKFURT
Update service attributes after PNF re-registration using SDNC DG. Current DG fails to do so

Testing

Lead: Swisscom / UNH-IOL

Provide lab environment for integration testing with multi-vendor OLT/ONT/Access SDN M&C
Support for integration testing
Enable automated testing of BBS use case via Robot (emulator of Access SDN M&C is needed for this)	STRETCHED FOR FRANKFURT

Documentation

Lead: Swisscom

Improve documentation on BBS use case provisioning

Demo

Lead: UNH-IOL? / Swisscom

BBS use case provisioning should be fully automated
Enhance BBS Portal to remove hard-coded segments and make it more user-friendly
Choose an appropriate allocation scheme for Remote-ID/CVLAN/SVLAN and remove the demo-oriented static mappings and PORT-VLAN calculation algorithm Circuit-ID should be read from PNF events provided by the BNG, providing access to/notification of this information in the operator OSS/BSS VES notifications from BNG rely on demo specific SourceNames, which will not be available to a BNG within a typically deployment.

BBS Development Status

Project	PTL	JIRA Epic / User Story*	Requirements
SO	Seshu Kumar Mudiganti	SO-1938 - Getting issue details... STATUS SO-1994 - Getting issue details... STATUS	Note: we need to split SO-1938 in multiple tickets
DCAE	Vijay Venkatesh Kumar	DCAEGEN2-1990 - Getting issue details... STATUS