Date
Attendees
Discussion items
- Physical Labs#IntelONAPIntegrationandDeploymentLabs-Oregon,USA
- Several previous security waivers have been extended already
- No budget to purchase new HW
- Lab and hardware belongs to Intel, Wind River was providing the support
- Bob Monkman
- Cannot provide 24 machines to ONAP no matter what
- How many actual servers needed to be supported for ONAP?
- Not worth moving the existing HW to another location – too old- - "That gear may never even come back up again."
- Investigating possibility of funding / donating servers for for installation in an external community managed lab.
- if new HW can be ordered and placed into a lab managed by someone else, then would ask for a ~90 day security waiver and then shutdown the lab
- Morgan Richomme
- Lab is used primarily for development but also by the integration team
- did an audit in mid 2020 to identify utilization in an effort to free up resources for CI chain
- Unnecessary users and VMs were cleaned up and removed.
- ~300 VMs shared across the community by ~500 devs remain
- 13 compute servers in active use today
- We know how many VMs were being used by each project, still some addl clean up could probably occur since the last one was 6-9 months ago
- Desire is to retain the same level of compute & storage resources as current lab provides
- Would like for the hardware to also be used for CI/CD for integration as well - currently only one chain left running in this lab today due to performance and stability issues, but development usage is the priority here.
- Stephen Gooch had already proposed to move to a more cloud native management model
#Agreed
- current lab stays as is for now
- Intel will look at capex potential - ability to do anything at all? If so, how quickly? Bob Monkman
- LF will look into hosting locations and maintenance costs @Stevew Ira
- Will run a new user / vm audit Morgan Richomme