You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 6 Next »

This will include e.g. credentials usage, performance, resiliency, testing requirements etc.

    • Support ONAP platform upgrade

      • How can we update a running ONAP instance in the field. Should this be part of the OOM scope with help of the architecture sub committee?
    • Support ONAP reliability

      • We have no well defined approach to fault tolerance neither on the component nor the system level. Should this be part of the OOM scope with help of the architecture sub committee?

    • Support ONAP scalability

      • How to scale ONAP? Should this be part of the OOM scope with help of the architecture sub committee?

    • Support ONAP monitoring

      • Common logging formats and approaches need to be supported and automated cross components monitoring tools should be developed/provided

    • Support a Common ONAP security framework for authorization and authentication

    • API Versioning

      • What are the detailed rules of API depreciation. We did commit at the NJ F2F that APIs can’t just change between releases but we never agreed on the actual process/timeline surrounding API changes etc.

    • Support ONAP Portal - UI enhancements

  • No labels