You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 3 Next »

  • Meeting times
  • TSC not technical enough.  Solve technical problems across projects when teams have trouble passing milestones.
  • Projects spending too much time on architecture/modeling, and not enough on code
  • Digest news from wiki, mailing lists on a weekly/monthly basis (newsletter?)
  • Prioritize TSC agenda/time to focus on high-priority
  • JIRA for TSC decisions to make sure we follow up
  • wiki internal organization (hard to find things under current structure)
  • Streamline ONAP - core projects + "add-ons"
  • Community still behaving in startup mode - development done inside companies, and dumped as seed code into projects, rather than transparent development in the projects
  • ONAP should behave more like a meritocracy. Projects added based on value to companies. Incubation area?  Approval criteria: significant commits from 3+ companies?
  • TSC membership - lose membership if you miss more than a certain number of meetings?
  • Too many private email exchanges. Use public forums.
  • Message board, especially close to the release. Reminders on upcoming milestones/project issues.
  • TSC members shepherd projects?
  • #1 issue is ease of joining ONAP for a newbie
  • documentation
  • be willing to close things. Too many subcommittees/tiger teams?
  • action register for TSC
  • prioritize/differentiate threads, triage and delegate threads, dashboard for status
  • No labels