The following items are expected to be completed for the project to Pass the M3 API Freeze Milestone.
M3 Release Architecture Milestone overview is available in wiki.
Practice Area | Checkpoint | Yes/No | Evidences | How to? |
---|---|---|---|---|
Architecture | Has the Project team reviewed the APIs with the Architecture Committee (ARC)? | No (No API changes in R3) | Architecture walkthrough to understand how each project contributes on Release Use Case. ARC to organize the walkthrough | |
Is there a plan to address the findings the API review? | Link to plan | The plan could be as simple as a Jira issue to track the implementation of findings or a documented plan within the wiki. | ||
Does the team clearly understand that no changes in the API definition is allowed without formal TSC review and approval? | Yes | NA | In the case some changes are necessary, bring the request to the TSC for review and approval. | |
Is there any changes in the scope, functionalities, deliverable, dependency, resources, API, repositories since M1 milestone? | No | If Yes, please a link to the evidence of these changes. | Critical point to understand is that change is inevitable, and that right timing and clear communication to the community will ease the process of accepting changes. | |
Provide link to the API Documentation. | ||||
Release Management | Are committed Sprint Backlog Stories been marked as "Done" in Jira board? | Yes | https://jira.onap.org/secure/RapidBoard.jspa?rapidView=51&projectKey=DMAAP&view=planning.nodetail | |
Are all tasks associated with Sprint Backlog Stories been marked as "Done" in Jira? | Yes | |||
Have all findings from previous milestones been addressed? | N/A | Provide link to JIRA findings | ||
Development | Is there any pending commit request older than 36 Business hours in Gerrit? | No | ||
Do you have a plan to address by M4 the Critical and High vulnerabilities in the third party libraries used within your project? | We planned to address all the critical issues. There is no category called "high". Is that mean severe | Ensure by M4 the Nexus-IQ report from “Jenkins CLM” shows 0 critical security vulnerability. Open the Nexus-IQ report for the details on each repo. | ||
Are all the Jenkins jobs successfully passed ( Merge-Jobs)? | Yes | https://jenkins.onap.org/view/dmaap/job/dmaap-dbcapi-master-merge-java/ https://jenkins.onap.org/view/dmaap/job/dmaap-buscontroller-master-merge-java/ https://jenkins.onap.org/view/dmaap/job/dmaap-messagerouter-dmaapclient-master-merge-java/ https://jenkins.onap.org/view/dmaap/job/dmaap-messagerouter-messageservice-master-merge-java/ https://jenkins.onap.org/view/dmaap/job/dmaap-messagerouter-mirroragent-master-merge-java/ https://jenkins.onap.org/view/dmaap/job/dmaap-messagerouter-msgrtr-master-merge-java/ https://jenkins.onap.org/view/dmaap/job/dmaap-datarouter-master-merge-java/ | ||
Are all binaries available in Nexus? | Yes | https://nexus.onap.org/#nexus-search;quick~dmaap | ||
Integration and Testing | Have 50 % of System Integration Testing Use Cases been implemented successfully in Jenkins? | Yes | https://jenkins.onap.org/view/dmaap/job/dmaap-datarouter-master-csit-dr-suite/ https://jenkins.onap.org/view/dmaap/job/dmaap-master-csit-mrpubsub/ | Out of the 12 test cases, 8 testcases are running with out any issues. We are working on fixing the remaining test cases |
Has the project code successfully passed the Daily Build process? | Yes | https://jenkins.onap.org/view/dmaap/ | Some CSIT jobs are failing due to some test case failures(50% test cases are running with out any issues). We are working on fixing them |