Purpose
Frequent meetings for ONAP El Alto Release contributors to discuss scope, requirements and development progress on DMaaP.
Logistics
Community Meetings & Calendar - See for further details
Wed 9am EST: DR working session & DMaaP status meeting
Connection Details:
#dmaap No.2
Join from PC, Mac, Linux, iOS or Android https://zoom.us/j/987639384
One tap mobile +16699006833,,987639384# US (San Jose) +16465588656,,987639384# US (New York)
Dial by your location +1 669 900 6833 US (San Jose) +1 646 558 8656 US (New York) +1 855 880 1246 US Toll-free +1 877 369 0926 US Toll-free Meeting ID: 987 639 384
Find your local number: https://zoom.us/u/aepvj958Jh
DMaaP Working Session Agenda
- Blocking Issue (status, new?)
- Open Issue (status, new?)
- Project Management - Jira-based discussion of status
Issue Tracker
Open Items:
| Ref | Blocking? | Status | Component | Description/Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | On Hold | All | Communication to register DR Node & BC DR node reg with BC client? - Hook is in place, values need to pass still to be determined post install hooks, flag can be added to keep alive (if post install jobs are completed they are deleted, flag is to allow them to not be deleted) 04/24: potentially call meeting next week with Jack Lucas, when we have resolved RC0 issues 05/01: Demo done at DCAE meeting - link to be added Jack is currently on holidays (return date - 5/5) , can we use same logic as demoed? Wednesday meeting(5/8) to discuss this in greater detail? 5/8: Meeting with Jack postponed to 5/15 5/13: Jack not available on 5/15. Dom to meet with Jack on 5/14 to have initial discussion. Reference wiki page: DMaaP Edge Deployment 5/15: Dom spoke with Jack. wiki page above updated. Review today. 5/22: Jira tickets for El Alto already created. Need little bit redesign and more discussion with the OOM team. 5/29: Continuation with POC. 6/5: Mike Elliott will be scheduling a meeting to further discuss. Fiachra trying core-dns plugin with rke. 6/19: had meeting with MIke Elliot before DDF. Not much progress.. reviewed what's in progress. 07/17: OOM plan to finalise decision on Ingress controller soon. OOM-1993 - Getting issue details... STATUS Likely they are going with Istio + nginx Ingress Controller. This should allow Service Mesh config https://itnext.io/istio-service-mesh-the-step-by-step-guide-adf6da18bb9a which will potentially help with multi-(site/cluster) deployment. 08/07: Jira for Ingress Controller testing created - DMAAP-1268 - Getting issue details... STATUS 11/06: This topic has been put on hold due to lack of activity from various teams. This will be resurrected once the topic gains more momentum. | |
| 5 | Moved to Frankfurt | All | 07/17: OOM are proposing a global AAF flag OOM-1986 - Getting issue details... STATUS which we discussed previously. Will potentially need to align existing patch with their proposal. 09/25: this is tied with the HTTP disabling item below. The HTTPS-only exposure will be pursued in Frankfurt release | |
| 7 | Moved to Frankfurt | All | 08/28: Disable HTTP port altogether and only provide HTTPS endpoints for all the containers. Dependency on AAF cert based auth and how it will be mitigated. 09/25: This effort for HTTPS-only will be pursued in Frankfurt |
Closed Items:
| Ref | Blocking? | Status | Component | Description/Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | Closed | All | Global jjb vs nexus staging for El Alto - more details to follow 5/01: Need to discuss for El Alto reference wiki page: global-jjb Migration Tracker 05/13: Mandar to find if more documentation is available. 05/22: Checked with Jess. She mentioned at the moment only projects with no other dependencies are being handled. Since DMaaP has dependency on AAF, AAF has to be done first. We can start working on this once Dublin is released. 5/25: Mandar to check with Jessica if this can be kicked off. 7/10: all projects updated and issues resolved for master branch. Next step to cherry pick to Dublin branch and validate. 7/24: Closing this. Dublin branch to be updated only if required. | |
| 3 | Closed | All | Is there any indication from the PTL Meeting as to the expected Badging requirement for El Alto? Most specifically the potentially time consuming activities like: The project MUST have FLOSS automated test suite(s) that provide at least 80% statement coverage if there is at least one FLOSS tool that can measure this criterion in the selected language. Also for confusion on specific questions is there a procedure to request some clarity? Some are discussed on the SECCOM discuss list 07/31: Mandar conformed 55% test coverage is sufficient for silver badge | |
| 4 | Closed | All | 07/17: DMaaP charts move out of OOM into DMaaP projects. Mandar to send note to Mike Elliott to see if this can be initiated.
08/07: Jira created with OOM blocking tasks - DMAAP-1267 - Getting issue details... STATUS to track the above. | |
| 6 | Closed | All | SECCOM have requested that the PTL be added to all CII Badging pages. PTL added to all DMaaP project |