Agenda:
- Agenda bashing - 5 minutes
- items for checking:
- modeling glossary: gendoc templates check
- ves spec: IM update check
- License model proposal discussion - Kevin, 30 minutes
- Modeling Process discussion - Ben, 20 minutes
Material:
Minutes:
- Agenda bashing:
- modeling glossary:
- Kevin has started working on the gendoc templates
- will first focus on class, datatypes and enumerations; would discuss whether to add attributes afterwards
- ves spec update:
- 7.1.1 update hasn't been finalized
- current updates only have a minor affect on UML: modify association names, which is kind of "invisible" from the diagrams
- would wait for spec to finalize first, then have a review for the updates on the UML diagram; could go for a quick review and approval if only association names are changed
- Discussed items:
- License model proposal:
- the main problem is besides the SDC implementation, R6 also has a discussion for license use case, and the two are not aligned
- Michela suggest to start with a discussion of use case before discussing models, to understand better how AT&T would like to have for license management in ONAP
- Not all models in the current proposal are relevant for Ericsson and Nokia's use case, e.g., number of instances
- what's the purpose of IM
- document the implementation
- design a common model that would be agreed by the community, i.e., drive future usage
- vendor may prefer to have their own license management entity
- next steps:
- get service provider involvement
- have a dedicate meeting to present E&N's proposal (no regular meeting for now)
- utilize use case subcommittee calls for discussion, reach out to more service providers (like Orange); Timo could ask Alla
- topics for modeling subcommittee:
- use of stereotypes
- different review process for models reflecting the implementation vs model for future design
- Modeling Process:
- no time for discussion
- continue next week
{"serverDuration": 212, "requestCorrelationId": "815123fdada3b9c3"}
