You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 28 Next »

This centralized page, for all Guilin projects, is aimed at identifying the risks as they are foreseen within the release life cycle.

A Risk that materialized becomes an Issue.

Status:

  • Identified: a risk that has been identified, but has not yet been analyzed / assessed yet 
  • Assessed: an identified risk which currently has no risk response plan 
  • Planned: an identified risk with a risk response plan
  • In-Process: a risk where the risk response is being executed 
  • Closed: a risk that occurred and is transferred to an issue or the risk was solved/avoided
  • Not occurred: a risk that was identified but that did not occur 
  • Rejected: created and kept for tracking purposes but considered not to be used yet


Risk IDProject Team or person identifying the riskIdentification DateRisk (Description and potential impact)Team or component impacted by the risk

Mitigation Plan

(Action to prevent the risk to materialize)


Contingency Plan - Response Plan

(Action in case of the risk materialized)

Probability of occurrence (probability of the risk materialized)

High/Medium/Low

Impact

High/Medium/Low

Status
1ESRJuly 1st 2020The REQ-341 has dependency on ESR for updating the K8s cluster information.REQ-341To have the friends from Aarna network to help us in this functionality.In case ESR does not make it to Guilin, we will use the postman for updating the AAi with the detaisHighMedIn progress.
2SDCJuly 6th 2020The REQ-349 - Coverage of 55%SDCMinimize impact of changes to limit breakage of coverage metricswill request an exception for GuilinLowLow

Current metrics are at 54.8%, some sonar metrics do not show up on main page but are visible in details.

In Progress for improvments

3SDCJuly 6th 2020REQ 351 - Migration to Java 11SDCTry to get commitments from more companies to help on finishing the migrationwill request an exception for GuilinMediumLowMigration to Java 11 is well under way on main SDC project, still the complexity of project implies that there are several unknowns in completing this change
4OOFJuly 8, 2020

Meeting non-functional requirements due to resource constraints

OPTF/CMSOTry to get commitments from potential contributorswill request an exception for GuilinLowLow

NFRs specific to CMSO are done. Common NFRs will be taken care along with other projects 

5DCAEJuly 8, 2020

Meeting non-function requirements - REQ-379 (approved base image) complaince 


DCAE
  • Finalize approved base image ASAP
  • Resource committment required from multiple companies due to number of components involved
Will be worked in-phase and need exception for components not migratedHighLow

Assessed


8/7 - As base image are not finalized, this work cannot be addressed in Guilin

6DCAEJuly 8, 2020

DCAE being large project with 40+ component, need more time for complaince with non-functional requirements - REQ-366 & REQ-365 

DCAEHave commitment from Ericsson; more contributors will help mitgating the risk  Will be worked in-phase and need exception for components not compliantMediumMediumIdentified
7DCAEJuly 8, 2020

Resource/time constraint for supporting  nonfunctional REQ-351 (Java11 upgrade).

 MOD-Genprocessor components will need exception (due to NiFI upstream dependency)

DCAE

More companies to help with migration

Will be worked in-phase and need exception for components not migrated.

MediumLowIn-progress
8PortalJuly 8, 2020

Meeting the following Non-Functional Priority 1 and 2 Requirements

https://jira.onap.org/browse/REQ-380
https://jira.onap.org/browse/REQ-379
https://jira.onap.org/browse/REQ-366
https://jira.onap.org/browse/REQ-362
https://jira.onap.org/browse/REQ-351
https://jira.onap.org/browse/REQ-357
https://jira.onap.org/browse/REQ-356
https://jira.onap.org/browse/REQ-386

PortalNeed support from communityPhased approach and file exceptions for the items that cannot be delivered or picked up by communityHighMediumIdentified
9HolmesJuly 9, 2020

There's no env for the team to carry out any functional tests. Due to the network restriction in our company, we have no access to the WindRiver lab, so it seems impossible for us to do any tests after code modifications. This would impact the integration with AAF.

HolmesTrying to apply for HW resources to build up a testing env within our company.will request an exception for GuilinMediumMediumIdentified
10SDCJuly 9, 2020

Meeting non-functional requirements - 

REQ-366 & REQ-365 

SDCNeed support from communityPhased approach and file exceptions for the items that cannot be delivered or picked up by communityHighMediumIdentified
11MultiCloudJuly 9, 2020Meeting non-functional requirements -  REQ-373 , REQ-363 , REQ-351REQ-349 , MultiCloudNeed support from communityWill request waiver in Guilin releaseHighMediumIdentified
12AAIJuly 9 2020AAINeed support from communityWill request waiver in Guilin releaseHighMediumIdentified
 13MSB July 15th Can not meet REQ-351 lack of capacity MSB Need support from communityWill request waiver in Guilin release High HighIdentified 
 14Modeling July 15th  

Meeting non-functional requirements -

REQ-373

REQ-361 

 Modeling Need support from community Will request waiver in Guilin release HighHigh Identified 
 15 VID July 15th  Can not Meeting non-functional requirements - REQ-361 VID Need support from communityWill request waiver in Guilin release High High Identified 
 16 VF-C July 15th  

 Meeting non-functional requirements -

REQ-373

REQ-365 

 VF-CNeed support from community Will request waiver in Guilin release High High Identified 
17PolicyJuly 23 2020Meeting non-function requirements - REQ-379 (approved base image) compliance Policy

Need finalized approval base image ASAP, in order to request the resource from community

Will request waiver in Guilin releaseHighLowIdentified 
18HolmesJuly 28, 2020Don't know where to get support regarding AAF integration.HolmesMark the requirement as a stretched goal.Defer it to the next release.HighMediumIdentified
19UUIJuly 29, 2020

Can not Meeting non-functional requirements - REQ-361 

UUIMark the requirement as a stretched goal.Defer it to the next release.LowLowIdentified
20CCSDKJuly 31 2020Meeting non-function requirements - REQ-379 (approved base image) compliance CCSDK

Need finalized approval base image ASAP.  Specifically, need guidance on which base image to use for openjdk 11 on alpine.

Will request waiver in Guilin releaseHighLowIdentified 
21SDNCJuly 31 2020Meeting non-function requirements - REQ-379 (approved base image) compliance SDNC

Need finalized approval base image ASAP.  Specifically, need guidance on which base image to use for openjdk 11 on alpine.

Will request waiver in Guilin releaseHighLowIdentified 
  • No labels