Background:
Current resource information model has all objects categorized as "class". Comments received state that some of them should be “Datatype” instead of “Class”.
The proposal is to follow the ETSI IFA015 v2.4.1 document to change some of the objects to be categorized as "Datatype".
This page shows the current proposal and collects feedback within 1 week's time (until Apr. 22, while recommend to feedback before Apr. 20).
Current Proposal:
| Category | |
|---|---|
| Objects categorized as “Class” | Objects categorized as “Datatype” |
| Vnfd | VirtualCpuData |
| Vdu | VirtualMemoryData |
| SwImageDesc | LogicalNodeData |
| VirtualComputeDesc | LinkBitrateRequirements |
| VirtualStorageDesc | ScaleInfo |
| Cpd | QoS |
| VduCpd | LocalAffinityOrAntiAffinityRule |
| VnfExtCpd | AddressData |
| VduProfile | L2AddressData |
| VirtualNetworkInterfaceRequirements | L3AddressData |
| VnfVirtualLinkDesc | CpProtocolData |
| VnfDf | ConnectivityType |
| VirtualLinkProfile | VirtualCpuPinningData |
| VirtualLinkDescFlavour | RequestedAdditionalCapabilityData |
| InstantiationLevel | VnfConfigurableProperties |
| VduLevel | VnfcConfigurableProperties |
| AffinityOrAntiAffinityGroup | LifecycleManagementScript |
| VnfIndicator | MonitoringParameter |
| VnfdElementGroup | VnfInfoModifiableAttributes |
| PlacementGroup (Experimental) | |
| BaseConfigGroup (Experimental) | |
| DeploymentGroup (Experimental) | |
1 Comment
Jessie S Jewitt
On behalf of ARM we support this proposal.