From: FREEMAN, BRIAN D
Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2019 1:42 PM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: Integration PTL Self Nominations
Dear Integration Committers,
It is time to get ready for Frankfurt with an official PTL for Integration. We will follow the official ONAP process for PTL elections as described in: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Annual+Community+Elections
If you are interested in the Integration PTL position, please reply to all to do self-nomination.
We will close the self-nomination window by 23:59 EDT October 10th, Thursday, 2019. Further instructions will be sent out to the committers based on the election procedure. The final result will be announced on the ONAP lists as soon as it is available.
Regards,
Brian Freeman
Standin PTL
Candidates
Nominations Closed on 10/11 .
CIVS Poll started and voters notified.
Morgan is the only candidate
Poll will close 10/14/2019 at 11:59
| Name | Company | Id | Bio |
|---|---|---|---|
| Morgan Richomme | Orange | Morgan is a senior network architect within Orange, working on the cutting edge of innovation services, such as NFV and SDN. | |
Votes
| Committer | Vote | Reference |
|---|---|---|
Last statistics
src bitergia, timeframe last 6 months: https://onap.biterg.io
integration repo
| Author | Commits | Added Lines | Removed Lines | Avg. Files |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 161 | 8457 | 12535 | 6.9 | |
| 80 | 6692 | 483 | 2.2 | |
| 63 | 1162 | 4969 | 2.4 | |
| 63 | 2945 | 506 | 2.3 | |
| 60 | 1223 | 687 | 1.9 | |
| 45 | 14270 | 2463 | 12.5 | |
| 27 | 6047 | 2286 | 4.1 | |
| 22 | 511 | 143 | 3 | |
| 21 | 268 | 58 | 1.4 | |
| 20 | 3897 | 260 | 2.7 | |
| 17 | 1327 | 18 | 1.8 | |
| 17 | 1488 | 149 | 2.2 | |
| @grabinsk | 17 | 1723 | 1251 | 6.3 |
| @marek pondel | 14 | 174 | 137 | 1.6 |
| 12 | 17541 | 16879 | 8.3 | |
| 12 | 961 | 110 | 2.7 | |
| 11 | 388 | 351 | 5.5 | |
| 10 | 220 | 87 | 2.8 | |
| 8 | 7398 | 60 | 5 | |
| 7 | 426 | 122 | 3.3 |
Demo repo
| Author | Commits | Added Lines | Removed Lines | Avg. Files |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 38 | 8195 | 939 | 16.6 | |
| 28 | 905 | 6536 | 10.9 | |
| 14 | 2487 | 148 | 6.3 | |
| 12 | 855 | 109 | 6.3 | |
| 7 | 3753 | 114 | 7 | |
| 7 | 5092 | 38 | 11.3 | |
| 6 | 139 | 46 | 1.5 | |
| 5 | 486 | 728 | 5.4 | |
| 4 | 44 | 84 | 11.3 | |
| 3 | 2127 | 6960 | 22 | |
| 1 | 0 | 26 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2352 | 1 | 6.5 | |
| 2 | 434 | 0 | 1 | |
| 2 | 492 | 0 | 2 | |
| 2 | 1103 | 213 | 13 | |
| 2 | 10 | 10 | 2.5 | |
| 2 | 213 | 204 | 5.5 | |
| 1 | 22 | 0 | 1 | |
| 1 | 1879 | 0 | 11 |
See on bitergia for the other integration repositories:
- Oparent
- Testsuite
- Testsuite/oom
- Testsuite/heatbridge
- Testsuite/python-testing-utils
- Integration/csit
- Integration/devtool (last is casablanca)
- Integration/benchmark (last is casablanca)
2 Comments
Marcin Przybysz
Hi Morgan Richomme, Brian Freeman . What with statistics from confluences , jiira etc? Do we check them also in context of voting rights?
Morgan Richomme
the stats are only informative here. The voting rights are not directly linked to the code stats, it is just an indicator