This table summarizes each project's plan in regard to support of "Platform Maturity" in London Release. The data below are extracted from each project plan.
The Platform Maturity recommendations are documented in Platform Maturity Requirements (and sub-pages) from Jason Hunt
Legend
Color code:
- Red: below maturity level
- Yellow: same maturity.
- Green: improved maturity level.
M1 Actual represents the assessment before M1. M1 Target represents, at M1 date, what the team plans to implement. M4 result represents what has been really implemented at M4 date . All these fields are self-assessed by the team.
CII Badging Tracking: http://tlhansen.us/onap/cii.html
| AREA | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Design / Run-Time | (min: Level 2 for closed-loop project; 0 for others) | (min: level 2 all projects) | (min: level 2 for runtime, level 1 others) | (min: Project Level 2, 70% at silver) | (min: level 1 for runtime projects) | (min: level 2 all projects) | (min: level 2 all projects) | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Min TSC Recommendations | M1 Actual | M1 Target | M4 result | M1 Actual | M1 Target | M4 result | M1 Actual | M1 Target | M4 result | M1 Actual | M1 Target | M4 result | M1 Actual | M1 Target | M4 result | M1 Actual | M1 Target | M4 result | M1 Actual | M1 Target | M4 result | |
| Project Name | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| A&AI | R | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Common Controller SDK | R | 0 | 0 | 0 | NA | NA | NA | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1+ (75% toward silver) | 1+ (75% toward silver) | 1+ (75% toward silver) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| CPS | R | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 (Note #4) | 1 (Note #4) | 1 (Note #4) | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1+ (83% towards gold) | 1+ (83% towards gold) | 1+ (91% towards gold) | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| DCAE | D & R | |||||||||||||||||||||
| DMaaP | R | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1+ | 1+ | 1 | 1 | 1+ | 1 | 1+ | 1+ | 1+ | 1 | 1 | 1+ |
| Holmes | R | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1+ | 1+ | 1+ | 1+ | 1+ | 1+ | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1+ | 2 | 2 |
| Microservices Bus | R | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| Modeling | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| Multi VIM/Cloud | R | |||||||||||||||||||||
| ONAP CLI | D & R | |||||||||||||||||||||
| ONAP Usecase UI Project | R | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| Policy Framework Project | D & R | D: 1 R: 2 | D: 1 R: 2 | D: 1 R: 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | D: 2 R: 2 | D: 2 R: 2 | D: 2 R: 2 | 2 (silver) | 2 (silver) | 2 (silver) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| SDN-C | R | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1+ (82% towards silver) | 1+ (82% towards silver) | 1+ (82% towards silver) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| Service Design & Creation | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| Service Orchestrator | R | |||||||||||||||||||||
| VFC | R | |||||||||||||||||||||
| VNF SDK | D | |||||||||||||||||||||
Note 1: Level2 - Swagger definition completed for all component exposing API's. Component API's standardized with ONAP API Common Versioning Strategy for majority of DCAE component with some exception (older platform components)
Note 2: CLI https enabled, direct vaulnerability cleared with avaiable new 3rd party versions, but silver badge is not applied yet. so given with 1.5. increased manageability by providing additional commands already. usability increased with provided web console, linux console and direct mode
Note 4: Assumption is that platform 72 hour test is run by Integration team
Note 5: plus AAF-generated certificate and HTTPS mode by default.
Note 6: logging spec very close to 1.2;
Note 7: VNFSDK integrate OPNFV Dovetail and ONAP CLI to run the xNF Test cases and VNFSDK also have a portal to trigger the tests.