ONAP R4 Resource IM Call 2019-2-11

General Information:

Modeling Current Activity Status
- PNFD: poll finish tomorrow, please provide any comment if you have, or it's considered agreed
- Comparison with IFA011: one more week's time for review, poll would be triggered afterwards against the papyrus model
  - suggest to provide gendoc as well as the class diagrams on the wiki for the poll
  - a problem is the current model also contains other proposals that are not agreed
    - either need to mark the two proposals seperately e.g., by using stereotypes, or to provide a "clean" model only containing the comparison proposal, e.g., editing the gendoc output
    - need further discussion in papyrus call
Root Class Analysis
- Kevin represent the background information for his discussion with Jessie
- further offline discussion is expected
- root class design in TMF and MEF are analyzed
Feedback to ETSI F2F meeting
- Xu would update the wiki page to align with the latest comparison page, e.g., properly using valueRange stereotype
- Xu, Kevin and Jessie would help provide information for the rationale column (other volunteers are also welcomed)
- Thinh would provide a discussion paper to the ETSI F2F meeting with the information from this wiki page
- expect ETSI to provide feedback in April
ONAP R4 Modeling High Level Requirements
- suggest to work on allotted resource more for putting it into Dublin release
- VES would be also possbly put into Dublin
VES model
- encourage people to give feedback on the wiki page (VES 7.1)