Meeting Minutes
Table of Contents maxLevel 2
Jan 4th, 2022 at 2pm UTC
- LFN Developer event CNF sessions
- 4 Presentations
- Need to follow up with Byung
- Add the landing page as reference for any presentation
- Need to contact Kanagaraj about
- VTP - VNFSDK - OVP 2.0 CNF support in ONAP - Developer Wiki - Confluence - latest updates/roadmap, etc
- Anuket Assured - ONAP CNF Compliance Badge - Developer Wiki - Confluence
- Need to contact Anuket to understand the expectations
- 4 Presentations
- New landing page - should we publish? New Landing Page
- Follow-up with Chaker about the Architecture Diagram(s)
- Action for all to review/contribute to the landing page
- Add agenda, recording links, etc.
- ONAP for Enterprise
- Integration with Magma (Service Delivery) - v1.6 – Byung-Woo Jun + Yogendra Pal
- Identify KPIs/Metrics that we can consume from Magma (Service Assurance)
- Explore SABRES Integration (Secured Network Slices)
- Need to follow-up with yolendra about 2022-01-13 - EMCO: Orchestration of Magma - LF Networking - LF Networking Confluence vs ONAP Enterprise ONAP/Magma architecture + Meeting 12-14-21 - 5G SBP - LF Networking - LF Networking Confluence
- AOB?
- Next meeting on 1/18
Jan 18th, 2022 at 2pm UTC
- LFN DDF sessions - Any feedback?
- Major accomplishment: Modeling Subcommittee has accepted the definition/specifications related to ASD
- Network Service modeling/ASD - https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Application+Service+Descriptor+%28ASD%29+onboarding+IM
Byung-Woo Jun is driving a POC to determine a reference implementation (onboarding, orchestration), to be re-used in O-RAN - Jakarta/Kohn releases - Wiki Use Cases - Onboarding: Application Package Onboarding to SDC, Orchestration: ASD-Based CNF Orchestration PoC, Distribution: Application Package Distribution
- Network Service modeling/ASD - https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Application+Service+Descriptor+%28ASD%29+onboarding+IM
- Great tutorial: 2022-01-11 - ONAP: CNF Orchestration Tutorial
- EMCO/Magma integration
- To be considered as a Bonus – independent initiative, not correlated to 5G Super Blueprint activity. No change in direction for the 5G Super Blueprint i.e., Magma integration with ONAP will continue as previously discussed
- See notes, recording from the latest Enterprise Task Force meeting
- Anuket: Anuket Assured - How can we deliver on the Anuket Value Proposition for Cloud Infrastructure and Cloud Native Workloads? Additional discussions between Anuket/EMCO/ONAP will be scheduled
- Major accomplishment: Modeling Subcommittee has accepted the definition/specifications related to ASD
- ONAP/EMCO Integration: Orchestrate at CNF level - Deploy the CNF on container (k8S). ONAP could stay at service level. We need to understand deeper prior changing our ONAP CNF Strategy/Implementation
- Finalise the New Landing Page - Ready to be published
Jan 25th, 2022 at 2pm UTC
- New landing page content is live! Please take a quick look and verify everything is correct (TSC Task Force - Cloud Native)
- Chaker Al-Hakim
Sharing suggestions for the CNF landing Page (E2E flows, HL diagrams) - user-67d6f Latest updates/roadmap about
- VTP - VNFSDK - OVP 2.0 CNF support in ONAP
- VTP was introduced into VNFSDK to support CVC testing
- For CNF, the first goal is compliance support.
- VTP is integrated with SDC. SDC can call VTP before on-boarding.
- VTP Ask: What is the ONAP CNF modeling and packaging format? There are two formats - Simplified K8S Resource Model - IM , Application Service Descriptor (ASD) Resource Data Model
- SDC is adding CNF on-boarding. How do they plan to support validation for CNFs. Byung-Woo Jun will follow up with the SDC project.
- Seshu Kumar Mudiganti - Clarification - VTP can currently handle CNF validation, based on the Helm approach, pre-ASD.
- The VTP project will need collaboration from the ASD leaders in order to add support for that format. Byung-Woo Jun and Marian Darula will follow-up. Probably after the ASD PoC in Jakarta is complete.
- There is a need for additional test cases for CNFs.
- Anuket Assured - ONAP CNF Compliance Badge
- Information will be updated once there is progress on the topic above.
- VTP - VNFSDK - OVP 2.0 CNF support in ONAP
Feb 1st, 2022 at 2pm UTC
- Chaker Al-Hakim Sharing suggestions for the CNF landing Page (E2E flows, HL diagrams)
- Do we want to move the comments from the landing page to 2020 MoM etc?
Feb 8th, 2022 at 2pm UTC
- Update on ASD
- Result from [onap-modelingsub] Email Poll on ASD Information Model andPackaging Format Marian Darula , @Thinh Nguyenphu
- Huawei is objecting the ASD concept on grounds that it is not aligned with ETSI-NFV
- During the poll there were no merit based objections. The only objection was the procedural one above.
- ASD is seeing support in the O-RAN community. Thinh Nguyenphu: Dropping ASD in ONAP might hurt it and put it behind other projects.
- Marian Darula - There is a need to escalate the issue and reach a decision.
- What could be the alternative? -
- Fernando Oliveira : The ETSI proposal is capable and satisfactory, providing the necessary functionality without significant complexity.
- Byung-Woo Jun : There was an attempt to align with ETSI. There were some challenges converting policies to VF module. The conclusion was this attempt did not work well.
- Marian Darula : There is a challenge synchronizing content between Helm chart and VNFD. That was the main concern by Ericsson that drove to the development of the ASD.
- Thinh Nguyenphu : Another motivation for ASD was parametrization, and the desire to use cloud-native approach to that.
- Can there (and should there) be one solution for packaging? Marian Darula - It was clear from day-1 of the ASD effort that there might be more than one approach. There was never an attempt to make ASD the only winning solution.
- Marian Darula , Thinh Nguyenphu : If ONAP does not adopt ASD, the development effort might move to another community, leaving ONAP "behind".
- Huawei is not objecting continuing the ASD PoC.
- Kenny Paul : The modeling subcommittee can make recommendations to the TSC, but ultimately it is a TSC decision.
- POC definition Approved PoC policy since the Dublin release. A subcommittee cannot block a PoC,. All that is required is that the PoC needs to be reviewed with the committee.
- Ranny Haiby : Any request to the TSC should be clear about keeping both approaches alive, and let them be developed in parallel, as alternatives.
- Next step: Bring this to the TSC to decide the future of the ASD PoC.
- Network Service modeling/ASD - Latest Updates - Byung-Woo Jun , Fernando Oliveira
- Result from [onap-modelingsub] Email Poll on ASD Information Model andPackaging Format Marian Darula , @Thinh Nguyenphu
Agenda Feb 15th, 2022 at 2pm UTC
- 5G Super Blueprint: EMCO/ONAP/Magma Integration - Meeting 01-25-22 - 5G SBP
Action Item(s) (In Progress)
- Byung-Woo Jun , Fernando Oliveira to present CNF activities to the TSC - TSC 2022-02-03
- (CNF Task Force): What do we need to ask to CNF Vendors to be onboarded on the ONAP Platform? These reqs could be shared with Anuket Assurance for the CNF badging