Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT

Name of Use Case:

<give it a name>vFW/vDNS

Use Case Authors:

<who wrote the use case>AT&T

Description:

The vFW/vDNS use case as implemented currently and described in the demo configuration here:


Installing and Running the ONAP Demos<provide a description on what the use case does>

Users and Benefit:

< who would benefit from this use case, how and under what scenarios >

VNF:

< list the VNFs this use case will automate/impact/use, be both generic like EPC and specific in terms of software used e.g. which EPC code or vendor product>

Work Flows:

< describe the work flows which are part of the use case. E.g. Instantiation, Deletion of VNF >

Controll Automation:

< describe any control automation that is part of the use case E.g. auto scaling, auto fault detection or recovery>

Project Impact:

Allows for quick and easy demos without any infrastructure or lab constrains.

Can be easily automated for daily integration testing.

VNF:

vFW

vPacketGenerator

vDataSink

vDNS

vLoadBalancer

all VPP based.

Work Flows:

  • Instantiation
  • Performance based control loop


Controll Automation:

See: Installing and Running the ONAP Demos

Project Impact:

No additional work.< list all projects that are impacted by this use case and identify any project which would have to be created >

Work Commitment:

< identify who is committing to work on this use case and on which part>