Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  • Agenda bashing
    • PNF instance model status & plan
        Model Proposals
          • expected to be finished within Guilin release
        • calendar issue
          • suggest people to modify the local outlook calendar if they are not correct
          • Andy will help double check the mailing list calendar
        • allotted resource
        • 5G RAN service model
      • Modeling Documentation
        • wiki page to record approved models
        • how to document relationship classes in Papyrus and readthedocs
          • question: are class names and description enough for the doc? (e.g., should we add cardinality, etc.)
            • possible content: cardinality, endpoint attribute name
            • Jacqueline suggest to add cardinality in the doc
            • Xu will help generate an example document for further discussion
        • how to treat "experimental" objects in readthedocs
      • Modeling Glossary
        • Common Model Glossary Review Comments
        • review:
          • #1 and #2, tend to agree we remove the items with no descriptions, record these items and provide descriptions where necessary
            • agree to remove
          • #3, #5, #6: refine the gendoc template for the glossary
          • #4: prefer to create an acronym list (in a seperate document)
            • agree to have a seperate document documenting the acronyms
            • question:
              • how to deal with related concepts that are missing defitions, for example, VirtualLinkProfile's definition relates to DF, therefore a definition of DF is expected?
                • 2 possible solutions:
                  • active way: group review of the document to provide each concept necessary
                  • passive way: implement definitions of missing concept when issues are raised
              • relationship with ETSI NFV definitions:
                • check if the definitions are aligned if same concepts are used
                • maybe can reference ETSI specs (e.g., NFV003) if necessary
          • #7: maybe refine the descriptions to remove the duplications
          • #8 and #9: refine the escaped characters?
          • #11: may take suggestion 1 at the moment, only provide a terminology document
            • agree to order the terms in alphabetic order
            • Michela suggest to order the classes, enumerations, etc. all together
              • Xu will look if that's possible by modifying the gendoc template
      • Model Proposals
        • allotted resource
        • 5G RAN service model
      • Modeling Process Discussion
        • M4 process
      • R7 Modeling Requirements