...
The E2E Network Slicing use case started in Frankfurt. Details of the Frankfurt implementation can be found at E2E Network Slicing Use Case in R6 Frankfurt.
Participants: China Mobile, Wipro, Huawei, AT&T, Amdocs, Verizon, Reliance Jio, Tencent, China Telecom, Tech Mahindra
Use Case Owners and Contacts
...
Table of Contents |
---|
USE CASE KEY INFORMATION
USE CASE | LEAD CONTACTS / DESCRIPTION | WIKI |
E2E Network Slicing |
Integration Leads |
Requirement ID | Jira for the requirement |
|
Jira | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||||||||
Architecture Sub-committee Jira tracker | Architecture sub-committee presentation |
|
Model Place / Geolocation / AAI Schema
Meetings Register
| ||
Prior projects wiki link | ||
BUSINESS DRIVER
This section describes Business Drivers needs.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY - This requirement will augment the work-flow to building block management within SO for Plug and Play operation. The continues the work started in R6. In R6, some of the SO work-flow to building block work was finished, and in R7 this is enhanced. The description of the "base" work which will be enhanced is shown in the wiki: PNF PLUG and PLAY in R6 Frankfurt
BUSINESS IMPACT - The enhancement to Plug and Play operation in ONAP is a critical business function because they enhance installation and commissioning activities.
BUSINESS MARKETS - This project applies to any domain (wireless, transport, optical, and wireline) that ONAP may manage.
FUNDING/FINANCIAL IMPACTS - The plug and play project has Operating Expense (OPEX) savings for operators because of the ability to saving time and expenses during installation and commissioning and contributes towards ZTM (Zero touch management).
...
Executive Summary: 5G Network Slicing is one of the key features of 5G. The essence of Network Slicing is in sharing network resources (PNFs, VNFs, CNFs) while satisfying widely varying and sometimes seemingly contradictory requirements to different customers in an optimal manner. Same network is expected to provide different Quality of Experience to different consumers, use case categories and industry verticals including factory automation, connected home, autonomous vehicles, smart cities, remote healthcare, in-stadium experience and rural broadband. An End-to-End Network Slice consists of RAN, Transport and Core network slice sub-nets. This Use Case intends to demonstrate the modeling, orchestration and assurance of a simple network slice (e.g. eMBB). While 3GPP standards are evolving and 5G RAN and core are being realized, this Use Case will start with realizing an E2E Network Slice with a simple example of a 5G RAN, Core and Transport Network Slice sub-nets. It will also align with relevant standard bodies (e.g., 3GPP, ETSI, TM Forum) as well as other open initiatives such as O-RAN where relevant, w.r.to both interfaces as well as the functional aspects.
Business Impact: Network Slicing is a feature that almost every service provider will leverage. It allows a service provider to improve their network efficiency by maximizing the network throughput more tailored to each user's use of the network. It is seen as an imperative for efficient and optimal use of their network. This will be particularly relevant as 5G is expected to have upwards of 10,000x the traffic load over 4G and 20GB peak data rates.
Business Markets: Network Slicing, for this use case, is specifically aimed at a 5G access, core and transport. In the future, this might be extended to other domains or applications such as fixed-wireless convergence, Wi-Fi access, all aspects of transport including fronthaul, or unified network management orchestration. Network Slicing functionality is what almost every wireless service provider will inevitably find valuable. The concepts and modeling work being done for Network Slicing will find applications in other areas as well. (Industries) Some applications and industries such as smart cities, remote maintenance, video streaming vs life-saving first-responder type applications will demand different requirements from Network slicing. (Markets/Regions) There are no regional specific aspects to Network Slicing.
Funding/Financial Impacts: Network slicing engenders the optimal use of resources for a Network. Thus, this represents OPEX savings for a service provider.
Organization Mgmt, Sales Strategies: There is no additional organizational management or sales strategies for this use case outside of a service
...
providers "normal" ONAP deployment and its attendant organizational resources from a service provider.
DEVELOPMENT IMPACTS
Requirement | |||
PROJECT | PTL | User Story / Epic | Requirement |
A&AI | |||
AAF | No impact foreseen | ||
APPC | |||
CLAMP | No impact foreseen | ||
CC-SDK | |||
DCAE | |||
DMaaP | No impact foreseen | ||
External API | |||
Integration | |||
MODELING | |||
Multi-VIM / Cloud | No impact foreseen | ||
OOF | |||
POLICY | |||
PORTAL | No impact foreseen | ||
SDN-C | |||
SDC | |||
SO | |||
VID | No impact foreseen | ||
VF-C | |||
VNFRQTS | |||
VNF-SDK | |||
CDS | |||
UUI | |||
Runtime Config DB |
List of PTLs:Approved Projects
INFORMATION ELEMENT DATA DETAILS
This table is taken from the generic information template: Generic Information Element TemplateInformation Element Template (one table for each Information Element)
...
Information Element Name
...
Name of the Information Element
...
Authors and maintainers of the Information Element
Information Element Main Contact (typically Use Case SME)
Information Modeling Contact
Schema Definition Contact
...
Use Cases that have interactions using this Information Element.
Please provide a point of contact for each related Use Case.
...
Participating ONAP Components
...
The list of ONAP Components that are stakeholders for the Information Element
...
Description
...
Overview and description of the Information Element.
...
Related Standards & Industry Activities
...
Please refer to any standards or industry activities that should be taken into account when defining the Information Model related to this Information Element. Please provide links to relevant material.
...
Attributes
...
Attributes: Name and describe each attribute of this Information Element. Please include the datatype of the attribute if possible. Is this attribute read-only, read-write? Are there any default values?
...
Relationships
...
Relationships: Describe how this Information Element is related to other Information Elements. Also describe nature of the relationship: association, inheritance, dependency, etc. and multiplicity.
...
Originator
...
Where does this information come from? (What component initially creates it)
...
Who uses this information inside & outside of ONAP? How do they use it?
Includes description of information consumed (whole class, specific attributes, etc.)
...
Producers
...
Who updates this information inside & outside of ONAP? Under what conditions do they update it?
Includes description of information produced (whole class, specific attributes, etc.)
...
Steward
...
Where will this information stored and maintained in ONAP?
...
Identify impacted ONAP schemas & APIs
Are there existing schemas be used or extended?
...
Information Modeling Status
...
What is the status of ONAP Information Modeling activities associated with this Information Element.
Please provide links to relevant wiki pages & JIRA.
...
Schema Definition Status
...
What is the status of ONAP Schema Definition activities associated with this Information Element.
Please provide links to relevant wiki pages & JIRA.
...
ONAP Release Priority
...
Prioritization for ONAP Releases
Use Case Functional Definitions
Note: This section will be shortly updated with links to relevant wiki pages/presentations.
Use Case Functional Definitions
Section | Description |
---|---|
Use Case Title |
E2E Network Slicing | |
Actors (and System Components) | The list of Actors and System Components that participate in the Use Case |
Description | Short overview of the Use Case |
Points of Contact | Authors and maintainers of the Use Case. Use Case Lead, Key Use Case members and code contributors. |
Preconditions | A list of conditions that are assumed to be true before the Use Case is invoked Includes description of Information Consumed |
Triggers / Begins when | Describes the trigger for beginning the Use Case |
Steps / Flows (success) | Describes the sequence of steps and interactions that occur during the Use Case (may include: description, data exchanges, functionality, state changes) Interaction diagrams may be included or referenced |
Post-conditions | The expected results of the execution of the Use Case Includes description of Information Produced |
Alternate / Exception Paths | Description of any exceptions or special process that could occur during Use Case |
Related Use Cases | List of the Use Cases referenced by this Use Case |
Assumptions | Describes any assumptions that are made for this use case |
Tools / References / Artifacts | List of any tools or reference material associated with this Use Case as well as any JIRA trace-ability. List of any associated diagrams or modelling artifacts associated with the Use Case |
Test Cases and Status
# | Test Case | Status |
---|---|---|
1 |
Request a service to be instantiated which involves RAN, Core and Transport sub-nets (RAN NSSMF within ONAP). It should result in a new NSI and new NSSIs to be created |
| |||||||
2 | create additional requirements as needed for each discreet step |
| ||||||
3 | Test cases should cover entire Use Case |
| ||||||
4 | Test Cases should include enough detail for testing team to implement the test |
|
Supporting Files
Description | File |
---|---|
Presentation on Use Case Realization Call on 1 Apr, 2020 | https://wiki.onap.org/download/attachments/81403386/ONAP_E2E_Network_Slicing_Usecase_realization_call_20200401.pptx?version=1&modificationDate=1585804290000&api=v2 |
Presentation to Requirements Sub-Committee on 2 Mar, 2020 | |
Presentation from F2F | |
Joint S/C presentation | RAN and Transport Slicing: Joint Meeting Apr 30, 2020 |
Presentation to ArchCom on 26 May, 2020 |
...