Versions Compared

Old Version 2

changes.mady.by.user Catherine Lefevre

Saved on

compared with

New Version 3

changes.mady.by.user Catherine Lefevre

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...


AREA

Design / Run-Time

Performance

(min: Level 2 for closed-loop project; 0 for others)

Stability

(min: level 2 all projects)

Resiliency

(min: level 2 for runtime, level 1 others)

Security

(min: Project Level 2, 70% at silver)

Scalability

(min: level 1 for runtime projects)

Manageability

(min: level 2 all projects)

Usability

(min: level 2 all projects)

Min TSC Recommendations
M1 Actual

M1 Target

M4 resultM1 ActualM1 TargetM4 resultM1 ActualM1 TargetM4 resultM1 ActualM1 TargetM4 resultM1 ActualM1 TargetM4 resultM1 ActualM1 TargetM4 resultM1 ActualM1 TargetM4 result
Project Name





















A&AIR1

1

2

1+ (75% toward silver)

1

1




1

Common Controller SDKR0

NA

2

1+ (75% towards silver)

NA

2

2

DCAED & R1

2

2

1+ (76% 84% Silver)

1

1+

1+

(see Note#13Note#1)



DMaaPR1

2

2

1+



1

1+

1

External API FrameworkR2

2

2

1+

1

1

2

HolmesR2

1

1+

1+

1

1

1+

Microservices BusR2

2

2

1

2

2

2

ModelingD/R1

1

2

1

1

2

2

Multi VIM/CloudR1

2

2

2

1

1

2

ONAP CLID & R1

1

2

1.5 Note #28#2

1

1

2 Note #28#2

ONAP Optimization FrameworkR1

1

2

1+

(75% towards silver)



1

1

1

ONAP Usecase UI ProjectR1

1

2

1

1

1

2

Policy Framework Project ProposalD & R

D: 1

R: 2



2



D: 2

R: 2



2 (silver)

1



2



2

Portal Platform Project ProposalD & R

2

(Note #27#3)



2

(Note #27#3



2

2

1

2

2+

SDN-CR0

1

2

1+ (75% towards silver)

1

2

2

Service Design & CreationD0

2

(Note #2#4)



1



1

(Note #12#5)



1

1

(Note #10#6)



1

Service OrchestratorR1

1

2

1+

(89% towards Silver)



1

1

1

VFCR1

1

2

1

1

2

2

VIDR0

2



2

2

1

2



2

VNF SDKD0

1

1

1.5




1

1

2

(Note #19#7)




Note 1: Assumption is that platform 72 hour test is run by Integration team;

Note 2: Assumption is that platform 72 hour test is run by Integration team

Note 10: logging spec very close to 1.2;

Note 11: Will work Logging Spec in Guilin

Note 12: plus AAF-generated certificate and HTTPS mode by default.

Note 13:  Level2 - Swagger definition completed; new component API's standardized with ONAP API Common Versioning Strategy and some existing component (VESCollector) updated

Note 14: All level2 requirements will be addressed except logging complaince (for older component).

Note 16: CII silver level > 70%. All external ONAP communication over secure interface. Not all internal communication secure and being deferred to El Alto.

Note 17: MDC and markers to be implemented. Project is already using EELF framework for logging.

Note 18: VNFSDK Already support to expose API via Https, blocked http. oom updated.

Note 19: VNFSDK integrate OPNFV Dovetail and ONAP CLI to run the xNF Test cases and VNFSDK also have a portal to trigger the tests.

Note 24: the logging project reads logs from other components and displays to Kibana.

Note 25: retrieve information from other components via API.

Note 26: Assuming AAF Resource needs are met.

Note 27: Angular upgrade Completed, Security updates planned in Guilin release for Portal.

Note 28: CLI 2: CLI https enabled, direct vaulnerability cleared with avaiable new 3rd party versions, but silver badge is not applied yet. so given with 1.5. increased manageability by providing additional commands already. usability increased with provided web console, linux console and direct mode

Note 3: Angular upgrade Completed, Security updates planned in Guilin release for Portal.

Note 4: Assumption is that platform 72 hour test is run by Integration team

Note 5: plus AAF-generated certificate and HTTPS mode by default.

Note 6: logging spec very close to 1.2;

Note 7: VNFSDK integrate OPNFV Dovetail and ONAP CLI to run the xNF Test cases and VNFSDK also have a portal to trigger the tests.