This table summarizes each project's plan in regard to support of "Platform Maturity" in Jakarta London Release. The data below are extracted from each project plan.
...
| AREA | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Design / Run-Time | (min: Level 2 for closed-loop project; 0 for others) | (min: level 2 all projects) | (min: level 2 for runtime, level 1 others) | (min: Project Level 2, 70% at silver) | (min: level 1 for runtime projects) | (min: level 2 all projects) | (min: level 2 all projects) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Min TSC Recommendations | M1 Actual | M1 Target | M4 result | M1 Actual | M1 Target | M4 result | M1 Actual | M1 Target | M4 result | M1 Actual | M1 Target | M4 result | M1 Actual | M1 Target | M4 result | M1 Actual | M1 Target | M4 result | M1 Actual | M1 Target | M4 result | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Project Name | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| A&AI | R | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Common Controller SDK | R | 1 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 0 | NA | NA | NA | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1+ (75% toward silver) | 1+ (75% toward silver) | 1+ (75% toward silver) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Common Controller SDK1 | R1 | 0 | NA1 | 2 | 1 | + (82% towards silver)NA | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||||||
| CPS | R | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 (Note #4) | 01 (Note #4) | 11 (Note #4) | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1+ (83% towards gold) | 1+ (83% towards gold) | 1 | + (91% towards gold) | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| DCAE | D & R | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| DMaaP | R | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1+ | (96% Silver)1+ | (~96% Silver)1 | 1 | 1+ | 1 | 1+ | 1+ | (see Note#1)1+ | DMaaP1 | R1 | 1+ | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Holmes | 2R | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | +1 | +1 | 1+ | 1+ | 1+ | 1+ | 1+ | Holmes | R | 21+ | 1 | 1 | 1 | +1 | +1 | 2 | 12 | 1+ | 2 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Microservices Bus | R | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Modeling | D/R | 10 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | + (96% Silver)1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | Multi VIM/Cloud | R | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 12 | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Multi VIM/Cloud | R | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ONAP CLI | D & R | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ONAP Usecase UI Project | R | 1 | 1 | 21 | 1 | .5 Note #21 | 1 | 2 | Note #2ONAP Optimization Framework | 2 | R2 | 1 | 1 | 21 | 1 | +(85% towards silver)1 | 1 | 1 | ONAP Usecase UI Project | R1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 12 | 1 | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Policy Framework Project | ProposalD & R | D: 1 R: 2 | D: 1 R: 2 | D: | 21 R: 2 | 2 | 2 | (silver)1 | 2 | D: 2 R: 2 | SDN-CD: 2 R: 2 | 0 | D: 2 R: 2 | 12 | 1+( | 82% towardssilver) | 12 (silver) | 2 | Service Design & Creation | D | 0 | (silver) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 (Note #6) | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| SDN-C | R | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Service Orchestrator | R | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1+ Added more CSIT and SO gating increased the stability of the releases. | 1+ | 1+2 | 2 | 2 | 1+ | ( | 89%82% towards | Silversilver) | 1+ | ( | 89%82% towards | Silversilver) | 1+ (82% towards silver) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | VFC | R | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | |
| Service Design & Creation | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 1 | +(93% Silver)1 | 21 | 21 | VNF SDK1 | D1 | 01 | 1 | 1 | 1 | .51 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | (Note #7)|||||||||||||||||||||||
| Service Orchestrator | R | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| VFC | R | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| VNF SDK | D | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Note 1: Level2 - Swagger definition completed for all component exposing API's. Component API's standardized with ONAP API Common Versioning Strategy for majority of DCAE component with some exception (older platform components)
...