This table summarizes each project's plan in regard to support of "Platform Maturity" in Guilin Honolulu Release. The data below are extracted from each project plan.
...
| Info | ||
|---|---|---|
| ||
Color code:
M2 Actual M1 Actual represents the assessment before M2 (from previous release or the starting point for a new project). M2 M1. M1 Target represents, at M1 date, M2 date (spec freeze) what the team plans to implement. M3 result (code freeze) M4 result represents what has been really implemented at M4 date . All these fields are self-assessed by the team. |
...
| AREA | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Design / Run-Time | (min: Level 2 for closed-loop project; 0 for others) | (min: level 2 all projects) | (min: level 2 for runtime, level 1 others) | (min: Project Level 2, 70% at silver) | (min: level 1 for runtime projects) | (min: level 2 all projects) | (min: level 2 all projects) | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Min TSC Recommendations | M1 M2 Actual | M1 M2 Target | M4 M3 result (code freeze) | M1 M2 Actual | M1 M2 Target | M4 M3 result | M1 M2 Actual | M1 M2 Target | M4 M3 result | M1 M2 Actual | M1 M2 Target | M4 M3 result | M1 M2 Actual | M1 M2 Target | M4 M3 result | M1 M2 Actual | M1 M2 Target | M4 M3 result | M1 M2 Actual | M1 M2 Target | M4 M3 result | ||
| Project Name | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| A&AI | R | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1+ (75% toward silver) | 1+ (75% toward silver) | 1+ (75% toward silver) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| Common Controller SDK | R | 0 | 0 | 0 | NA | NA | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1+ (75% towards silver) | 1+ (75% towards silver) | 1+ (75% towards silver) | NA | NA | NA | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | |
| CPS | R | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 (Note #4) | cannot update until after RC0 because CPS is New | 0 | 1 (Stretch 2) | cannot update until after RC0 because CPS is New | 1+ (90% towards silver) | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 (Stretch 2) | 1 | ||
| DCAE | D & R | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1+ (84% Silver) | 1+ (84% Silver) | 1+ (95% Silver) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1+ | 1+ | 1+ | 1+ (see Note#1) | 1+ | 1+ | |
| DMaaP | R | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1+ | 1+ | 1+ | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1+ | 1+ | 1+ | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| External API Framework | R | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1+ | 1+ | 1+ | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | |
| Holmes | R | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1+ | 1+ | 1+ | 1+ | 1+ | 1+ | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1+ | 1+ | 1+ | |
| Microservices Bus | R | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | |
| Modeling | D/R | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1+ | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | |
| Multi VIM/Cloud | R | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | |
| ONAP CLI | D & R | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1.5 Note #2 | 1.5 Note #2 | 1.5 Note #2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 (Note #2) | 2 (Note #2) | 2 | |
| ONAP Optimization Framework | R | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1+ (84% towards silver) | 1+ (84% towards silver) | 1+ ( | 75% 85% towards silver) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| ONAP Usecase UI Project | R | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1+ (89% silver) | 1+ (89% silver) | 1+ (89% silver) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | |
| Policy Framework Project Proposal | D & R | D: 1 R: 2 | D: 1 R: 2 | D: 1 R: 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | D: 2 R: 2 | D: 2 R: 2 | D: 2 R: 2 | 2 (silver) | 2 | 2 (57% towards gold) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | |
| SDN-C | R | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1+ (75% towards silver) | 1+ (75% towards silver) | 1+ (75% towards silver) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | |
| Service Design & Creation | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 (Note #4) | 2 (Note #4) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 (Note #5) | 1 | 1 (Note #5) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 (Note #6) | 1 | 1 (Note #6) | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| Service Orchestrator | R | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1+ (89% towards Silver) | 1+ | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| VFC | R | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1+ | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | |
| VID | R | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | |
| VNF SDK | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 (Note #7) | 2 | 2 | |
Note 1: Level2 - Swagger definition completed; new component API's standardized with ONAP API Common Versioning Strategy and some existing component (VESCollector) updated
...