Use Case Authors:

...

AT&T, China Mobile, Ericsson, Metaswitch Network, Orange

Description:

A Mobile Service Provider (SP) plans to deploy VoLTE services based on SDN/NFV.  The SP is able to onboard the service via ONAP. Specific sub-use cases are:

...

VoLTE users benefit from the network service provided by SPs via ONAP, as their user experience will be improved, especially during the peak period of traffic

VNF:

Utilize vendors VNFs in the ONAP platform.

Note: The above captures the currently committed VNF providers, we are open to adding more VNF providers.

Note: The committed VNF providers will be responsible for providing support for licensing and technical assistance for VNF interowrking issues, while the core ONAP usecase testing team will be focused on platform validation. 

NFVI+VIM:

Utilize vendors NFVI+VIMs in the ONAP platform.

Note: The above captures the currently committed VIM providers, we are open to adding more VIM providers.

Note: The committed VIM providers will be responsible for providing support for licensing and technical assistance for VIM integration issues, while the core ONAP usecase testing team will be focused on platform validation. 

Network equipment?

Network equipment vendors.

...

Note: The above captures the currently committed HW providers, we are open to adding more HW providers.

Note: The committed HW providers will be responsible for providing support for licensing and technical assistance for HW integration issues, while the core ONAP usecase testing team will be focused on platform validation. 

Topology Diagram:

Work Flows:

Customer ordering

...

• VNF Auto-Scaling/Auto-healing
  
  
  
• Termination

Controll Automation:

Open Loop

• Auto ticket creation based on the policy (stretch goal)

Closed Loop

• Auto-scaling (stretch goal)

When a large-scale event, like concert, contest, is coming, the service traffic may increase continuously, the monitoring data of service may grow higher, or other similar things make the virtual resources located in TIC edge become resource-constrained. ONAP should automatically trigger VNF actions to horizontal scale out to add more virtual resource on data plane to cope with the traffic. On the contrary, when the event is done, which means the traffic goes down, ONAP should trigger VNF actions to scale in to reduce resource.

...

After the fault detected and its root correlated, ONAP should do the auto-healing action as specified by a given policy to make the system back to normal.

Open Loop

• Auto ticket creation based on the policy

Closed Loop

• Horizontal scaling to support add or remove machines into the pool of resources
• Vertical scaling to support add or remove resources (ex. CPU, Memory, Storage) from existing virtual machines ?Stretch goal?
  • comment: Vertical Scaling seems to be explicitly discouraged by the VNF Guidelines.  Is Vertical Scaling a valid use case requirement?

Configuration flows (Stretch goal)

• Create (or onboard vendor provided) application configuration Gold standard (files) in Chef/Ansible server
• Create Chef cookbook or Ansible playbook (or onboard vendor provided artifacts) to audit and optionally update configuration on the VNF VM(s)
• Install the Chef client on the VM (Ansible doesn’t requires)
• After every upgrade or once application misconfiguration is detected, trigger auditing with update option to update configuration based on the Gold Standards
• Post-audit update, re-run audit, run healthcheck to verify application is running as expected
• Provide configuration change alert to Operation via control loop dashboard

Platform Requirements:

• Support for commercial VNFs
• Support for commercial S-VNFM/EMS
• Support for Multiple Cloud Infrastructure Platforms or VIMs
• Cross-DC NFV and SDN orchestration
• Telemetry collection for both resource and service layer
• Fault correlation application
• Policy for scaling/healing

Project Impact:

< list all projects that are impacted by this use case and identify any project which would have to be created >

...

• SDC
  Add logic to use the new modeling when designing the service, and then distribute the resulting artifacts
• SO
  Add logic to understand the new artifacts; orchestrate/manage changes according to it
• SDNCSDN-C/SDN Agent
  Add logic to support to provision the underlay and overlay connection service between clouds, including 3^rd party commercial SDN controllers. 
• DCAE
  Support statistics collection on the VoLTE case and receipt of events as per the new model
• VNF
  Support to integrate with S-VNFM/S-EMS to fulfill the NS lifecycle management and configuration.

• VFC VF-C and DCAE
  Support more complex control Support the above control loops
• SO/SDNCSDN-C/SDN Agent/VFCVF-C
  Monitor the service to verify the all NSs/VNFs have been executed, and update A&AI. 
• A&AI
  Support the new data model
• Policy
  Support new policy related to the scaling and healing in VoLTE use case
• Multi-VIM
  Support multiple VIMs 

Priorities:

1 means the highest priority.

Work Commitment:

< identify who is committing to work on this use case and on which part>

Name of Use Case: vEPC

Use cas authors:

Orange

Description:

Extend EPC capabilities with vSGW and vPGW. Demonstrate how to use a hybrid (PNF+VNF) solution using ONAP

Image Added

Version 0: no automatic legacy configuration. Deployment on a single OpenStack data-center based with no SDNC

Version 1: only configure legacy MME.  Deployment based on a single OpenStack data-center based with no SDNC

Version 2: configure the full EPC (legacy+virtualised) functions on 2 OpenStack data-centers using SDNC

VNF should be compliant with APP-C and DCAE using Netong/Yang for configuration and VES or SNMP for event collections

V0

On-boarding/Design phase

The ONAP designer onboards the VNF descriptors, define the Directed Graphs for the 2 VNF and the legacy MME for configuration and defines the service.

The ONAP designer defines a simple policy rule: to scale vPGW on the basis of the number of sessions and configure the MME to take into account the new vPGW

Open questions:

• do we need to describe the PNF in the SDC ?
• how to plug the legacy MME management solution to APP-C ?

Deployment phase

The ONAP-operating deploys the vEPC service.

As a result, one vSGW and one vPGW are deployed using SO and APP-C and updating AAI.

Closed loop

Triggered on a number of sessions, the policy engine executes the rule that triggers the SO to instantiate a new vPGW and will the APP-C to configure both the vPGW and the MME.

Image Added

Users and benefits:

SPs benefit from vEPCuse case in the following aspects:

1. service agility: more easy design of both VNF and network service, VNF onboarding, and agile service deployment.
2. resource efficiency: through ONAP platform, the resource can be utilized more efficiently, as the services are deployed and scaled automatically on demand.
3. operation automation and intelligence: through ONAP platform, especially integration with DCAE and policy framework, vEPC VNFs and the service as a whole are expected to be managed with much less human interference and therefore will be more robust and intelligent.

vEPC users benefit from the network service provided by SPs via ONAP, as their user experience will be improved, especially during the peak period of traffic

VNF:

VNF vendors to be defined

VNF open-source available: OAI, openEPC, C3PO