Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  • Agenda bashing
  • Model Proposals
    • ETSI support for CNF model
      • R9 DM proposal: https://wiki.onap.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=93011772
        • aligned with SOL001 v4.2.1, package format is still under discussion
        • will ask for approval after SOL001 v4.2.1 is stable
      • a proposal of updating the information model documentation is planned in R9
      • Updates:
        • SOL001 is delayed and expected to be stable at the end of July
    • CNF runtime model
      • IM: Simplified K8S Resource Model - IM
      • questioncomments:
        • 1) need to create empty classes for "tenant", "vnf-module", etc.? A: will keep the comments as for now, and Jacqueline will help reverse-engineer the related classes
        • 2) whether the attribute definitions are acceptable? A: need further check, and needs double check with the model owner on "version", "group" descriptions.
        • the relationship between k8s-resource and cloud-region should be N:1 rather than 1:N
        • prefer to show the relationship in the diagram
        • suggest to add relationship with the root model
      • Xu will update the IM and discuss next week
    • 5G service / CPS model
    • PNF instance model
      • reverse engineering
      • migrating to new version
        • Jacqueline has done the experiment of creating gendocs using two different versions of eclipse
          • the gendoc of the new version seems fine, but the gendoc of the old version breaks (missing parent class information)
        • AP:
          • Xu will try to experiment the same things as well, and discuss again next week
    • Topology model
      • Proposal: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Abstract+Topology+Model
        • Martin will update the models with the IM sketch
      • Model Sketch: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Proposed+Topology+IM+Sketch
      • Andy has helped to create a high level requirement for the topology model
        • expecting ORAN to provide relavent use cases
        • Martin and Andy are aware of the different views of topology model presented last week by Cagatay
        • mainly triggered by ORAN WG10, also related to WG1's slicing use case, etc.
        • how to model different layers, physical, logical topology, etc.? current methodology is using UML/papyrus to capture the models
      • Latest updates:
        • Tony provides some comments on the model sketch:
          • simplify the "service" models
          • relationship between the topology model and ONAP IM / root model
            • currently working on high level concepts, discussing whether we need to have certain objects in the ONAP IM, and maybe part of the topology model
            • e.g., Connectivity, EndPoint
          • from developer's perspective, suggest to avoid too many hops to access the models/info
          • intent part needs further discussion, and suggest to focus on aspects first
        • Andy will arrange further call to discuss the model
        Latest updates:
        • Adding concepts like clients and servers, further discussion are needed to for the context of the new terms
        • also whether the whole objects should be put under "ManagedFunction" needs further discussion
  • Modeling Documentation
    • gendoc template discussion:
      • whether the description only applies for a navigatable end of an association
      • add relationship documentation to the UML guideline: 
        Jira
        serverONAP JIRA
        serverId425b2b0a-557c-3c0c-b515-579789cceedb
        keyONAPMODEL-28
      • UML principle wiki page: