EditThe page is intended to summarize all the requirements for Frankfurt Release.
These requirements have been prioritized by the TSC to realistically fit within the Frankfurt Release Timeline.
The Release Scope should be finalized during the M1 Release Planning milestone on November 7th, 2019
TSC Prioritization (Ranking)
- RANK #0 – Special GO - quick wins, fully covered by involved companies
- RANK #1 – TSC Must Have – Mandatory for the release
- RANK #2 – Continuity - Items continued from previous releases
- RANK #3 – PTL Go – items that PTLs is OK to include since team has bandwidth
- RANK #4 – NO GO – items not approved for various reasons
Requirements Milestones Summary
See also Documenting Release Requirements in JIRA
Epic Link | Fix For Versions (all) | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Frankfurt Release | Guilin Release | Honolulu Release | Istanbul Release | Jakarta Release | Kohn Release | London Release | Montreal Release | New Delhi Release | Istanbul Maintenance Release 1 | Unscheduled | T: | |
5G / OOF SON Enhancement | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
5G / ORAN & 3GPP Standards Harmonization | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
5G OOF SON use case requirements for Guilin release | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
5G Service Modeling in R8 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 17 |
5G SON use case enhancements for Istanbul release | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 |
5G SON use case enhancements for Jakarta release | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 |
5G SON use case enhancements for Kohn release | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 |
5G SON use case enhancements for London release | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 16 |
5G SON Usecase R8 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 18 |
A1 Adapter Extension & A1 Policy Management | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
A1 Policy Functions Extension - Istanbul | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 |
A1 Policy Functions Extension - Jakarta | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 |
A1 Policy Functions Extension - Kohn | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 13 |
A1 Policy Functions Extension - London | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 |
Add VSP Compliance and Verification Check feature Phase 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
Akraino Distributed Analytics use case | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
All Control Loop Policy Models should be TOSCA Compliant | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
APPC Ansible automation with VNF-C LCM support | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
Architecture - modelling alignment | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
ASD onboarding package IM / DM | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 |
Bulk PM / PM Data Control Extension | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Bulk PM / PM Data Control Improvements | 0 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 |
Bulk PM / PM Data Control Improvements | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 |
Bulk PM / PM Data Control Improvements | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 |
CCVPN-E-LINE Service over OTN NNI | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
Total Unique Issues: | 196 | 22 | 248 | 184 | 189 | 107 | 187 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 84 | 1216 |
Use Cases
Release 6 (Frankfurt) proposed use cases and functional requirements
M1 Scorecard:
- Green: Use Case will be fully implemented and tested
- Yellow: Use Case will be partially implemented. It is possible to identify capabilities for this use case that can be tested (phasing approach).
- Red: Use Case can not be partially delivered, min. requirements can not be met in order to define a testing strategy.
M2/M3 Scorecard:
- Green: On Track
- Yellow: Use Case/Requirement not on track but could be mitigated by reducing the current scope and/or fix this issue prior M4. Risks identified and documented under Frankfurt Risks
- Red: Use Case/Requirement not on track and issue identified that will prevent from completing the development by M4. Use Case/Requirement should be moved to POC in alignment with the POC definition or descoped from the Frankfurt release.
Architecture:
- Pink - NO GO
- Purple - GO
- Green - Considered OK not requiring architecture review
- Black - Architecture not yet performed
T-Shirt Size: Ballpark estimation for assessing the development/testing activities performed by the project team; not the integration team
Use Case | JIRA link (REQ) One issue per requirement. | Owner(s) | TSC Ranking | M1 Scorecard | TSC M1 Approval Recommendation | M2/M3 Scorecard | TSC M2/M3 Approval | Link(s) to HLD/LLD if any | Dependency (from/to) another project(s) | T-Shirt Size | Project's Impact: Test Only (TO), Code (C) | Committed (C)/ Partially Committed (P) or not (N) per impacted project | If Partially or not Committed, what are gaps/ project (people/FTEs; HLD/LLD; etc) | Integration Lead | Company Engagement | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Third Party Operational Domain Manager | RANK #0 | GREEN | YES | GREEN | YES | Third-party Operational Domain Manager | S | SDC (C) SO (TO) AAI (TO) | Changes being done in local setup SDC: Committed based on Telstra contribution [TSC]: What does it mean? No SDC contribution to the ONAP Community. [Atif]:Changes were temporarily done locally, when the ElAlto branch wasn't cut and we couldn't commit to master | Will commit after review discussion with SDC PTL [TSC]:What's the status? PTL OK? [Atif] PTL is OK. Code commit started. | Telstra | Complete company commitment for delivery of Frankfurt Scope for this use case | ||||
Service Resolver Features | rene.robert@orange.com | RANK #4 | DESCOPED | NO | Service Resolver | SDC (C), SO (C), AAI (TO) | No SO decision | MISSING INFO | MISSING INFO | Orange | ||||||
CMPv2 CA Plugin for AAF | RANK #3 | GREEN Confirmed by AAF PTL | YES | YELLOW Update 1/24: The new approved committers resolved the risk for not getting the code committed into the project. The approval of a new targeted solution from ‘ArchCom’ results in no dependency on AAF CertMan, thus our previous major risks for delay has been resolved. This new design has resulted in a larger contribution than intially planned, which introduces a new risk of delay due to not sufficient time. | 1/21- Extraordinary committers have been approved by TSC on 1/16. Are we still RED? | XL - | AAF (C) Integration (C) | AAF: (C) Integration:(C) | See notes | AT&T Ericsson Nokia | Note: Nokia and Ericsson volunteered to work this. As PTL, I approved the path forward (create Client, build plugin, etc) but was unable to create actual REQ. Please consider this working item until them. (update : - REQ-140Getting issue details... STATUS created, at the moment we do not expect multiple release impacts but it has to be further checked) ALSO... This MAY be a multi-release effort, which will not affect normal Operations in anyway, if CMPv2 isn't completed within Frankfurt. | |||||
CCVPN: E-LINE Service over OTN NNI | LIN MENG | RANK #2 | GREEN | YES | GREEN Note: Functional impacts and API changes in the related modules have been reported and documented. To be more specific : API changes in A&AI and SDN-C are committed and merged. OOF: Swagger API document is provided; coding has be started by last week. U-UI has no API change, resource are in the coding phase now; | YES | E-LINE over OTN Inter-Domain Links - Proposal | XL (Multiple releases) | TO: SO; C: U-UI, A&AI, OOF, SDN-C | U-UI committed by ChinaMobile; A&AI committed by Huawei; OOF committed by Huawei; SDN-C committed by Huawei | China Mobile, Huawei | |||||
End to End Layer 1 Service Management. Modeling the Optical Service | RANK #3 | GREEN CCSDK PTL has confirmed he can deliver it | YES | GREEN Functional requirements & corresponding APIs have been documented across: A&AI, SDNC, CCSDK - merge in progress SO - coding phase UUI - coding phase | YES | Multi-domain Optical Network Services | CCVPN use-case alignment | XL (Multiple releases) | TO: SDC, ExtAPI C: UUI, SO, A&AI, SDN-C, CCSDK | SO - C A&AI - C SDN-C - C UUI - C CCSDK-C SDC - TO ExtAPI - TO Code will be committed by Fujitsu | Have gained PTL agreement & JIRA epics have been created under UUI, SO, SDNC, A&AI, CCSDK | Xin Miao | AT&T Orange Fujitsu | Working with CCVPN team to align towards common modelling for OTN | ||
Deploying Distributed External functions | RANK #0 | GREEN | YES | GREEN | YES | Depends on development progress of Multi-Cloud K8S work. | XL (Multiple releases) | TO: Multi-Cloud | Intel will contribute to this. There is no code development and it is for testing the work being done in MC project. | Intel, Aarna, TM |
- XS - <4 Man/Weeks;
- S - ~6 Man/Weeks;
- M - ~8 Man/Weeks;
- L - ~12 Man/Weeks;
- XL - > 12 Man/Weeks.
Requirements
M1 Scorecard:
- Green: The requirement will be fully implemented and tested
- Yellow: The requirement will be partially implemented. It is possible to identify capabilities for this functional requirement that can be tested (phasing approach).
- Red: The requirement can not be partially delivered, min. requirements can not be met in order to define a testing strategy
Architecture:
- Pink - NO GO
- Purple - GO
- Green- Considered OK not requiring architecture review
- Black - Architecture not yet performed
YES
YES
Requirement | JIRA link (REQ) One issue per requirement. | Owner | TSC Ranking | M1 Scorecard | TSC M1 Approval Recommendations | M2/M3 Scorecard | M2/M3 TSC Approval | Link(s) to HLD/LLD if any | Dependency (from/to) another project(s) | T-Shirt Size (XS, S, M, L, XL) | Project's Impact: Test Only (TO), Code (C), Documentation Only (DO) | Committed (C)/Partially Committed (P) or not (N) per Impacted projects | If Partially or not Committed, what are gaps/ project (people/FTEs; HLD/LLD; etc) | Integration Lead | Company Engagement | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
All Control Loop Policy Models should be TOSCA Compliant Operational, Guard Policies | RANK #2 | GREEN | YES | GREEN | YES | TOSCA Compliant Policy Types | SDC | M | CLAMP - C POLICY - C | CLAMP - C POLICY - C committed by AT&T & Ericsson | AT&T Ericsson | |||||
Policy Update Notifications | RANK #2 | GREEN | YES | GREEN | YES | Policy Update Notifications | S | DCAE - C POLICY - C | DCAE - C POLICY - C committed by AT&T | AT&T Wipro | DCAE: Commitment based on Wipro | |||||
CLAMP Deployment of Policies to PDP Groups | RANK #3 | GREEN | YES | GREEN | YES | CLAMP Deployment of Policies to PDP Groups | M | CLAMP - C POLICY- C | CLAMP - C POLICY - C committed by AT&T | AT&T Ericsson | ||||||
Integration of CDS as Actor in Control Loops | RANK #3 | GREEN | YES | GREEN | YES | CDS actor support in Policy | L | CLAMP - C POLICY - C CDS - C Integration - C | CLAMP - C POLICY - C CDS - C Integration - C | Partial commitment from Bell Canada to support Policy+CDS integration. Partial commitment from Huawei to support | AT&T Bell Canada Ericsson Huawei Orange | |||||
Control Loop Tutorial Documentation | RANK #3 | NO CODE IMPACT | YES | GREEN | YES | CLAMP, DCAE, POLICY | M | Documentation - DO Integration - TO | DOC - C (Orange) POLICY - C (AT&T) DCAE - C (AT&T) CLAMP - C (AT&T) | Morgan Richomme | Bell Canada, AT&T, Orange | |||||
Component Upgrades to new Policy Lifecycle API | RANK #2 | GREEN | YES | GREEN | YES | M | SDNC - C OOF - C POLICY - C | POLICY - C (AT&T & Intel) OOF - C (Intel) SDNC - C (AT&T) | AT&T, Intel | SO removed as impacted as they are removing Policy support from workflow. | ||||||
Modeling: Enhanced Nested and Shared Service Information Model - 5G / E2E Network Slicing modeling | TSC: Replaced by new E2E Network Slicing Scope No commitment to cover ExtAPI | NETWORK SLICING PoC in R6 Frankfurt (Obsolete) | L | SDC-C AAI-C External API | Company commitment per component SDC - C (Amdocs) AAI - C (Amdocs) | *Note: Not sure integration lead is needed for modeling | CMCC Amdocs AT&T Wiprc Huawei | |||||||||
5G / OOF SON Enhancement | RANK #3 | GREEN CCSDK is not required | YES | GREEN | YES | OOF (SON) in R5 El Alto, OOF (SON) in R6 Frankfurt | L | POLICY - C OOF - C DCAE - C SDN-C - C Integration (Demo VNFs) - C Runtime DB - C (see Remarks) | POLICY - C OOF - C DCAE - C SDN-C - C Runtime DB - C (see Remark( Integration (Demo VNFs) - C Policy, DCAE, Integration - Wipro commits OOF, Policy - AT&T commits SDN-C, Runtime DB - IBM commits | AT&T Wipro IBM | RAN-Simulator will be submitted as part of Demo VNFs repository Runtime DB may not be an official ONAP component in Frankfurt, however, the functionality required for our use case will be realized. | |||||
5G / Run-time Data Persistency (RunTime Config DB) and VES Model relations, VES CM model (CM Notify). | RANK #3 | GREEN PTL has confirmed he can deliver CCSDK, SDN-C | YES | GREEN | YES | 5G CONFIGURATION (RunTime DB) | CM Notify VES Event (defined by Harmonized U/C) this U/C will actually use the CMNotify VES event and DCAE development to use the Event. | L | A&AI - TO SDC - TO Controller - C RunTime DB (new component) - C DCAE - C | A&AI - C SDC - C Controller - C RunTime DB (new component) - C DCAE - C Controller, RunTimeDB, - IBM commits SDC (TO) - AmDocs will commit DCAE - Nokia commits A&AI Testing - IBM will do testing. | Sandeep Shah | Nokia AT&T | Will be a new component, presented at Architecture S/C. | |||
Modeling: GeoLocation Model (and standards harmonization) | Modeling work only | RANK #0 | NO CODE IMPACT | YES | GREEN | PNF PLUG and PLAY in R6 Frankfurt | AAI | M | N/A | N/A | N/A | Ericsson Nokia | ||||
PNF / PNF Software Upgrade using direct Netconf/Yang interface with PNF | RANK #2 | GREEN SO impact clarified and agreed in SO weekly meeting. | YES | GREEN | YES | PNF software upgrade in R6 Frankfurt | XL | SDC: C SO: C CDS: C VID: C Integration: C/DO VNFRQTS: DO | SDC: (C) SO: (C) CDS: (C) VID: (C) Integration: (C) Integration, SDC, SO, VID, CDS, and VNFRQTS are committed by Ericsson. SO is committed by Huawei | Ericsson Huawei | ||||||
PNF / Enable Schema Update once PNF software is updated | RANK #2 | GREEN Clarification: No impact on SO or VNF-SDK in R6. | YES | GREEN | YES | PNF software upgrade in R6 Frankfurt | M | SDC: C Integration: C VNFRQTS: DO | SDC: C Integration: C SDC, Integration and VNFRQTS are committed by Ericsson | Ericsson | ||||||
LCM API Evolution | TSC: Please merge with REQ-84 Oskar: Done, REQ-84 contains the R6 user stories related to this requirement. | https://wiki.onap.org/download/attachments/50202249/2019-07-02%20ONAP_R6_Controller_Evolution_LCM_APIs.pptx?api=v2 | N/A | Development in R6 will be part of REQ-84 | N/A | N/A | Ericsson | Main goals:
| ||||||||
PNF / Enhancement on PNF Software Upgrade with EM with Ansible | RANK #2 | GREEN SO impact clarified and agreed in SO weekly meeting. | YES | GREEN | YES | PNF software upgrade in R6 Frankfurt | LCM API Evolution | M | SO: C CCSDK: C Integration:C | SO: C CCSDK: C Integration:C Huawei commitment to SO,CCSDK,Integration | Huawei | |||||
PNF / PNF Software Upgrade with EM with Netconf | yaoguang wang | RANK #2 | GREEN SO impact clarified and agreed in SO weekly meeting. | YES | GREEN | YES | PNF software upgrade in R6 Frankfurt | PNF Software Upgrade using direct Netconf/Yang interface with PNF | M | SO: C CDS: C Integration:C | SO: C CDS: C Integration:C Huawei commitment to SO, CDS, Integration | Enbo Wang | Huawei | |||
5G / ORAN & 3GPP Standards Harmonization | RANK #0 | GREEN | YES | PARTIAL GREEN green for A1 part (code merged) O1 enhancements moved to G release | YES | MOBILITY STANDARDS HARMONIZATION WITH ONAP | M | SDNC: C DCAE: C | SDN-C: C DCAE: C SDN-C (A1 adaptor) committed by Ericsson & IBM DCAE committed by Nokia | Sandeep Shah (A1, O1) | AT&T Nokia Ericsson | DCAE: Impact for adopting new VES domain; Committed based on Nokia support. | ||||
5G / License Management | RANK #0 ANSWER: There is no S/W development in R6. Company Commitment is commitment to work on Modeling & Architecture work for R6. Most of this U/C will be modeling development. | NO CODE IMPACT | YES | GREEN No API, No S/W | YES | LICENSING MANAGEMENT | SDC | M | Modeling: DO VNFRQTS, after UCs agreed: DO
( *) No code or test impact expected in R6 as an outcome of the proposed UCs | Nokia and Ericsson commit to: | N/A | AT&T Nokia Ericsson Orange | No development. Activity driven by Nokia and Ericsson is Use Case development. The UCs and modeling are done in synch. | |||
5G / Bulk PM / PM Control | RANK #2 | GREEN SO impact clarified and agreed in SO weekly meeting. | YES | GREEN SO impact changed from C to TO. Instead added dependency to REQ-134 for SO PNF workflow enhancements. Also added REQ-25 as new dependency. Added AAI, CLAMP, Policy, SDNC and CCSDK as TO. | YES | 5G Bulk PM in Frankfurt/R6 | REQ-25 REQ-33 REQ-134 | XL | DCAE: C Integration: C SO: TO AAI: TO CLAMP: TO Policy: TO SDNC: TO CCSDK: TO | All code and test committed by Ericsson for the listed projects. | user-3784d | Ericsson | DCAE: Committed based on Ericsson support | |||
5G / Bulk PM / Secure Communication between xNFs and ONAP | Pawel Baniewski | RANK #2 | GREEN | YES | YELLOW Currently marked yellow due to dependency to REQ-140. | 1/21- Extraordinary committers have been approved by TSC on 1/16. Are we still RED? | 5G Bulk PM in Frankfurt/R6 | AAF (REQ-140) | S | DCAE: C | DCAE: C Nokia Commits to DCAE: C Development | Nokia | DCAE: Committed based on Nokia support | |||
5G / PM dictionary | RANK #2 | GREEN | YES | GREEN VES spec updated, reviewed and approved. Reconfiguration of SDC is in progress (JSON file change) | YES | FM META DATA & PM DICTIONARY in R6 Frankfurt | S | SDC: Update GAB Config File (no S/W update) DCAE: DOC DCAE: VES Event Reg Spec | SDC - C DCAE - C Nokia Commits to SDC, DCAE - C | Damian Nowak | AT&T Ericsson Nokia | DCAE: No code impact on VES reg yaml updates | ||||
5G / 5G NRM Network Resource Model (Configuration Mgmt) | yaoguang wang | RANK #3 | GREEN No commitment from SO lack of design, resource, etc Confirmation from yaoguang wang that the feature can be delivered even without SO. | YES | GREEN SO: requirements reviewed and approved. No additional API impacts. CDS: requirements approved. Parts of executor codes merged. | YES | 5G Network Resource Model (NRM) Configuration in R6 Frankfurt | M | SO: C CDS: C Modeling: DOC Integration: C | SO: C CDS: C Modeling: P Integration: C Huawei commitment to SO, CDS, Integration | yaoguang wang | Huawei | ||||
5G / 5G Service Modeling: Modeling (exploratory) work for creating a 5G Service | Modeling Work Only (No REQ) | RANK #0 ANSWER: It is just modeling in R6. AT&T and Nokia commits to working with Modeling S/C work. | NO CODE IMPACT | YES | GREEN | YES | 5G RAN SERVICE MODELING & DEFINITION in R6 Frankfurt | N/A | Modeling: C | Modeling: C | N/A (No integration or testing impact) | Nokia AT&T | Modeling work only | |||
PNF / Plug and Play | Benjamin Cheung | RANK #2 | GREEN Committed by SO PTL during the TSC call on 11/21 | YES | GREEN External certificate part marked as YELLOWdue to dependency to REQ-140. | Can you explain the dependency to REQ-140? | PNF PLUG and PLAY in R6 Frankfurt | AAF (REQ-140) | M | DCAE: C SO: C VID: C | DCAE: C SO: C VID: C NOKIA Committed to DCAE, SO and VID Development | Nokia | DCAE: SDK Dmaap lib refactor; committed based on Nokia support | |||
PNF / Configuration with NETCONF/ Secure Communication between xNFs and ONAP | RANK #3 | GREEN | YES | YELLOW Currently marked yellow due to dependency to REQ-140. | 1/21- Extraordinary committers have been approved by TSC on 1/16. Are we still RED? | Configuration with NETCONF in Frankfurt/R6 | M | SDNC: C SO: TO Integration: C | SDNC: C SO: C Integration: C SDNC, SO and Integration committed by Ericsson | Mariusz Sobucki | Ericsson | |||||
PNF / PNF pre-onboarding onboarding | RANK #2 | GREEN | YES | GREEN | YES | PNF/VNF PREONBOARDING / ONBOARDING in R6 Frankfurt | S | VNFSDK: C Integration: TO | VNFSDK: C Integration: C Nokia Commits to VNFSDK and Integration - C | Nokia Ericsson | Integration will only be for VNF-SDK work, there is not full E2E POB/OB integration in R6. | |||||
Modeling: Runtime instance model based on A&AI reverse engineering | RANK #0 | NO CODE IMPACT | YES | GREEN | YES | Reverse-engineering AAI data model to Papyrus information model | AAI | S | AT&T commits to the bug fix | N/A, producing a model file only, not a use case | AT&T Ericsson Huawei Orange | |||||
Modeling: documentation of policy resource model | Modeling Work Only | Andy Mayer | RANK#0 | NO CODE IMPACT | YES | DESCOPEDPolicy resource model No-Go for Frankfurt R6. | Policy | M | Modeling only. No new implementation requirements | AT&T | ||||||
Modeling: documentation of allotted resource model | Modeling Work Only | Andy Mayer | RANK #0 | NO CODE IMPACT | YES | YELLOW Allotted resource model still under review. | When the review will be completed? | SDC | M | Modeling only. No new implementation requirements | AT&T | |||||
Scaling Extensions | RANK #2 | GREEN | YES | GREEN | YES | Scaling Use Case (Frankfurt) | APPC CCSDK/CDS SO | S-M | APPC - C CCSDK - TO SO - C | APPC - C CCSDK - C SO -C (Actor selection of CDS and APPC) APPC - Nokia Shanghai CCSDK - Tech Mahindra SO - Tech Mahindra | Marco Platania | AT&T Nokia/Shanghai Nokia/Poland Tech Mahindra Orange | ||||
APPC Ansible automation with VNF-C LCM support / CHM | RANK #2 | GREEN | YES | GREEN | YES | Change Management Frankfurt Extensions | APPC Integration | S | APPC: C Integration: C | APPC and Integration Commited by Orange | @Lukasz Rajewski | Orange AT&T | ||||
vFW Traffic Distribution with Software Upgrade / CHM | RANK #2 | GREEN | YES | GREEN | YES | Change Management Frankfurt Extensions | Integration | XS | Integration: C | Integration Commited by Orange | @Lukasz Rajewski | Orange AT&T | ||||
Portal Security Enhancements | Manoop Talasila | RANK #1 | YES | GREEN | YES | MUSIC | L | Policy: C VID: C SDC: C | Portal partially committed by AT&T, IBM SDC: C | Partially committed by Samsung (to support OJSI tickets) | Dominik Mizyn (for OJSI tickets) | AT&T Samsung IBM | ||||
Portal Technology Stack Upgrade and New reporting features | Manoop Talasila | RANK #3 | YES | GREEN | YES | XL | Policy: C VID: C | Portal committed by AT&T, IBM | Partially committed by Samsung (to support Springboot upgrade on "portal" repo) Partially committed by IBM for test automation GAPS: No resources to support portal/sdk repo for Springboot upgrade. | Sireesh Chintamani (Overall Integration Lead) Sunder Tattavarada (for Angular upgrade) Dominik Mizyn (for Springboot upgrade on "portal" repo) Leimeng Shi (for reporting feature) | AT&T Samsung IBM | |||||
ETSI Alignment Support | RANK #2 | GREEN SDC No more required | YES | GREEN | ETSI Alignment Support | XL | SO: C SOL003 Adapter: C SOL005 Adapter: C ETSI Catalog Mgr: C SOL002 Adapter: C | SO (C): committed by Ericsson and others with scale back scope ETSI Catalog Mgr (C): committed by CMCC SOL003 Adapter (C): committed by Ericsson with scale back scope SOL005 Adapter (C): committed by Verizon with scale back scope SOL002 Adapter (C): committed by Samsung with scale back scope | Andrew Fenner | Ericsson Verizon CMCC Samsung Intel | ||||||
Architecture - Modelling Alignment | Stephen Terrill | TSC: Remove from the Frankfurt tracking. Ongoing discussions | L | SDC Modelling | ||||||||||||
Vertical Industry Oriented On-demand 5G Slice Service (this is merged with Network Slicing use case, and has become E2E Network Slicing) | LIN MENG | TSC: This requirement is now merged with Network Slicing. No more individual tracking | Modeling, U-UI, SO, DCAE | NA | China Mobile, Tencent, Huawei | Merged with E2E Network Slicing use case | ||||||||||
E2E Network Slicing There are two parts:
The above is a clarification consistent with previous archcom decisions, but detailing it more and is considered architecturally consistent given the scope (NSSMF outside ONAP). The following is not approved:
| RANK #3 TSC:
This should limit the impacts to SO and External API for Frankfurt | GREEN Based on revisited scope i.e. SO and ExtAPI, OOF and UUI ---------------- Lin Meng's comment (21st Nov): a) 15th &18th Nov: LinMeng's Mail sent to TSC explaining the "exception". b) 19th Nov: Steve's clarification of Arc decision in the first column. c) 20th Nov: Swami's Mail sent to TSC requesting OOF and UUI inclusion in scope (resource commitments and PTL agreements available) d) 21st Nov: LinMeng updated the columns for impacted modules, commitments based on the request sent to TSC , for TSC reference when in discussion Please help change the status to Green | YES considering #1 SO, ExtAPI UUI scope only #2 NSSMF is outside ONAP #3 OOF is exceptionally added and will be reviewed at M2 -------------------- Lin Meng (21st Nov) Confirmation: 1)Yes, we can deliver this feature for Frankfurt even without ExtAPI. 2) The impact in EXT-API for Frankfurt is only minimal impact, the resource has been identified and will be commited. Please help change the status to YES | GREEN (See Notes) | YES | E2E Network Slicing Use Case in R6 Frankfurt | SDC | XL | SO : C EXT-API : C POLICY : TO SDC : TO A&AI : TO U-UI : C OOF : C LinMeng updated on 21st Nov based on the request sent to TSC for including U-UI and OOF into scope, for TSC reference when in discussion | EXT-API : C (Huawei, Wipro) SO : C (Wipro, China Mobile, Huawei) POLICY : C (Wipro) SDC: C (China Mobile, Amdocs) A&AI : C (Huawei, Amdocs) U-UI : C (China Mobile) OOF : C (AT&T, Wipro) LinMeng updated on 21st Nov: Reply to TSC Concern: 1)Yes, we can deliver this feature for Frankfurt even without ExtAPI. 2) The impact in EXT-API for Frankfurt is only minimal impact, the resource has been identified and will be committed. | Wipro, Amdocs, China Mobile, Huawei, Tencent, AT&T, Verizon | Jan 15, 2020: SO, EXT-API, UUI and OOF are on track for the agreed scope, with respect to all aspects - APIs, functionality implementation, as well as resource commitments. | ||||
Remove Python2 dependencies | David McBride | RANK #1 | GREEN See feedbeck from PTL on the wiki except Stretch goals for SDC, VNFSDK to complete all in R6. Logging not committed for R6. | GREEN Exceptions:
| M | ALL projects using Python | ||||||||||
Multicloud K8s Support (Continuation from R4) | RANK #2 | GREEN | YES | <Missing Status> | K8S based Cloud region support (Continue from R4) | Multi-Cloud : C | Code Multi-Cloud : Intel Testing of SO, Multicloud, SDC: Intel | vFirewall: EdgeXFoundry Akraino ICN Distributed Analytics | Intel Aarna Tech Mahindra | |||||||
K8s CDS Support | RANK #3 | GREEN MultiCloud commitment confirmed | YES | GREEN | YES | S-M | MULTICLOUD: C CDS: C Integration: C SO: TO SDC: TO | CDS commited by Orange and Samsung MULTICLOUD commited by Samsung, Orange and Intel Integration commited by Samsung, Orange and Intel | Orange Samsung Intel | |||||||
K8s HPA Support | RANK #3 | GREEN | YES | GREEN | YES | S | MULTICLOUD: C OOF:TO Policy:TO AAI/ESR:TO SO: TO SDC: TO | Intel commits to coding in Multicloud and testing in OOF, Policy, AAI, SO, SDC | Marcus Williams | Intel | ||||||
K8s Security and traffic controller | RANK #3 | GREEN commitment from MultiCloud confirmed | YES | GREEN | YES | Multicloud K8s | S - M | MULTICLOUD: C | Intel commits to coding/testing in Multicloud | Intel | ||||||
VSP Compliance and Validation Check within SDC - Phase 2 | RANK #2 | GREEN | YES | GREEN | YES | VSP Compliance and Validation Check within SDC | SDC: C | ([Prabhu]: SDC PTL reviewed the design and Vodafone already committed the code in SDC and code review is in progress) | Prabhu Balan | Vodafone | ||||||
OVP Testing and Certification Support Within SDC | RANK #3 | GREEN | YES | DESCOPED the feature cannot be delivered in Frankfurt because of lack of resources in 2020 to complete integration testing | OVP Testing and Certification Support Within SDC (Frankfurt) | SDC - C VTP - C | SDC-iconectiv VTP-iconectiv | iconectiv | ||||||||
SECCOM Code coverage | RANK #3 | GREEN See feedbeck from PTL on the wiki | YES | YELLOWWaiting for a feedback from PTLs - Jira tickets were opened to all projects. Preliminary feedback is on track. | All projects | |||||||||||
SECCOM Containers configured per secure recommendation | RANK #3 | GREEN | YES | REDWaiting for a feedback from PTLs - Jira tickets were opened to all projects. | All projects using containers | |||||||||||
SECCOM Java 11 migration from v8 | RANK #3 | GREEN See feedbeck from PTL on the wiki. | YES | Waiting for a feedback from PTLs - Jira tickets were opened to all projects. | All projects using java | |||||||||||
SECCOM CII badging – meet targeted Silver and Gold requirements | RANK #3 | GREEN | YES | RED There has been no movement by the projects on the CII requirements for Frankfurt. | All projects | |||||||||||
SECCOM Complete the OJSI backlog | RANK #3 | GREEN excluding Logging Logging has open OJSI tickets but has been descoped from the release. Some of the tickets may not be closed easily but most of the most severe tickets is being worked on. | YES | YELLOW Not all of the tickets can be easily resolved due to AAF integration issues (i.e. in SO) but apart from that most of severe ticketes should be resolved till end of the release | All relevant projects having an entry in OJSI | |||||||||||
SECCOM HTTPS communication vs. HTTP | RANK #1 | GREEN except for Music (partial) and Holmes/Logging - no part of the release. See feedbeck from PTL on the wiki. | YES | GREEN Some projects tends to have issues with AAF integration to provide certificate but seems to be doable if issues in AAF are resolved | All relevant projects still using http communication instead of https | |||||||||||
SECCOM Password removal from OOM HELM charts | RANK #1 | GREEN | YES | YELLOWThe amount of work is increasing as we discovered encrypted passwords and other cases where change in the components is required and we don't have the competency to make all of them (java script). We ask for help in some of the projects (only on the code part, OOM changes can be done on time) | All relevant projects | |||||||||||
SECCOM Communication Matrix | RANK #3 | GREEN DCAE will be the 'prototype' project/pilot with this release. Lesson Learnt will be shared to other projects. | YES - DCAE only | GREEN AS agreed first focus on external communication. | YES | All relevant projects | ||||||||||
SECCOM Containers and Kubernetes secure configuration recommendation | RANK #3 | GREEN | YES | GREENWaiting for feedback from the Integration team | YES | All projects | ||||||||||
SECCOM Coverity integration by end of Frankfurt | RANK #3 | GREEN | YES | RED Waiting for an update from fd.io on their experience as Artem is not available for this task. | to be followed-up via TAC. Pawel to write to Jason | All projects using containers | ||||||||||
SECCOM Ingress controller | RANK #3 | GREEN | YES | GREEN Ingress is already configured for most of the components. Not all may be working properli (UI) but they all will be available through ingress | YES | All projects | ||||||||||
SECCOM Secure communication for 5G – AAF contribution – CMPv2 protocol trial usage | Hampus Tjäder | RANK #3 | Need to understand why it is yellow | AAF + TBC | ||||||||||||
SECCOM Perform Software Composition Analysis - Vulnerability tables | RANK #1 | GREEN except for Holmes/CLI and Logging - not part of R6 release See feedbeck from PTL on the wiki. | YES | REDWaiting for a feedback from PTLs. Script to automatically generate tickets is working. | All projects | |||||||||||
Document current upgrade component strategy | David McBride | RANK #1 | YES | GREEN |
T-Shirt Size: Ballpark estimation for assessing the development/testing activities performed by the project team; not the integration team
- XS - <4 Man/Weeks;
- S - ~6 Man/Weeks;
- M - ~8 Man/Weeks;
- L - ~12 Man/Weeks;
- XL - > 12 Man/Weeks.
POC / Experimentation
SECCOM ISTIO POC – limited ONAP deployment scope
Type | Requirement | Owner | Link(s) to HLD/LLD if any | Dependency (from/to) another project(s) | T-Shirt Size (XS, S, M, L, XL) | Project's Impact: Test Only (TO), Code (C) | Company Engagement | Notes | M4 Status | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POC | SECCOM ISTIO POC – limited ONAP deployment scope | |||||||||||||
POC | Acumos - DCAE Integration | GREEN | M | DCAE - C | AT&T Orange (Integration/UC support) | Met withEric Debeau/Orange team on 10/25 and they commited to support. | ||||||||
POC | Self Service Control Loops | XL | CLAMP - C DCAE - C Policy - C | AT&T |
T-Shirt Size: Ballpark estimation for assessing the development/testing activities performed by the project team; not the integration team
- XS - <4 Man/Weeks;
- S - ~6 Man/Weeks;
- M - ~8 Man/Weeks;
- L - ~12 Man/Weeks;
- XL - > 12 Man/Weeks.