You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 36 Next »

This table summarizes each project's plan in regard to support of "Platform Maturity" in Honolulu Release. The data below are extracted from each project plan.

The Platform Maturity recommendations are documented in Platform Maturity Requirements (and sub-pages) from Jason Hunt

Legend

Color code:

  • Red: below maturity level from previous release
  • Yellow: same maturity level than previous release.
  • Green: improved maturity level from previous release

M2 Actual represents the assessment before M2 (from previous release or the starting point for a new project).

M2 Target represents, at M2 date (spec freeze) what the team plans to implement.

M3 result (code freeze) represents what has been really implemented at M4 date . All these fields are self-assessed by the team.

CII Badging Tracking: http://tlhansen.us/onap/cii.html


AREA

Design / Run-Time

Performance

(min: Level 2 for closed-loop project; 0 for others)

Stability

(min: level 2 all projects)

Resiliency

(min: level 2 for runtime, level 1 others)

Security

(min: Project Level 2, 70% at silver)

Scalability

(min: level 1 for runtime projects)

Manageability

(min: level 2 all projects)

Usability

(min: level 2 all projects)

Min TSC Recommendations
M2 Actual

M2 Target

M3 result

(code freeze)

M2 ActualM2 TargetM3 resultM2 ActualM2 TargetM3 resultM2 ActualM2 TargetM3 resultM2 ActualM2 TargetM3 resultM2 ActualM2 TargetM3 resultM2 ActualM2 TargetM3 result
Project Name





















A&AIR11
11
22
1+ (75% toward silver)1+ (75% toward silver)
11

1


1
11
Common Controller SDKR00
NANA
22
1+ (75% towards silver)1+ (75% towards silver)
NANA
22
22
CPSR00

0


1

(Note #4)


0

1

(Stretch 2)


1+ (90% towards silver)2
00
22
0

1

(Stretch 2)


DCAED & R11
22
22
1+ (84% Silver)1+ (84% Silver)
11
1+1+

1+

(Note#1)

1+
DMaaPR11
22
22

1+

1+
11
1+1+
11
External API FrameworkR22
22
22
1+1+
11
11
22
HolmesR22
11
1+1+
1+1+
11
11
1+1+
Microservices BusR22
22
22
11
22
22
22
ModelingD/R111222222111111222222
Multi VIM/CloudR111222222222111111222
ONAP CLID & R11
11
22
1.5 Note #21.5 Note #2
11
11
2 (Note #2)2 (Note #2)
ONAP Optimization FrameworkR111111222

1+

(84% towards silver)

1+

(84% towards silver)

1+

(85% towards silver)

111111111
ONAP Usecase UI ProjectR11
11
22
11
11
11
22
Policy Framework Project ProposalD & R

D: 1

R: 2

D: 1

R: 2


2

2

D: 2

R: 2

D: 2

R: 2


2 (silver)2

1

1

2

2
22
SDN-CR00
11
22
1+ (75% towards silver)1+ (75% towards silver)
11
22
22
Service Design & CreationD000

2


2

(Note #4)

2

(Note #4)

1

11

1

(Note #5)

1

1

(Note #5)

111

1

(Note #6)

1

1

(Note #6)

111
Service OrchestratorR11
11
22

1+

(89% towards Silver)

1+
11
11
11
VFCR111222222111111222222
VIDR00

2

2
22
22
11

2

2
22
VNF SDKD00
11
11
1.5


1.5
11
11

2

(Note #7)

2


Note 1: Level2 - Swagger definition completed; new component API's standardized with ONAP API Common Versioning Strategy and some existing component (VESCollector) updated

Note 2: CLI https enabled, direct vaulnerability cleared with avaiable new 3rd party versions, but silver badge is not applied yet. so given with 1.5. increased manageability by providing additional commands already. usability increased with provided web console, linux console and direct mode

Note 3: Angular upgrade Completed, Security updates planned in Guilin release for Portal.

Note 4: Assumption is that platform 72 hour test is run by Integration team

Note 5: plus AAF-generated certificate and HTTPS mode by default.

Note 6: logging spec very close to 1.2;

Note 7: VNFSDK integrate OPNFV Dovetail and ONAP CLI to run the xNF Test cases and VNFSDK also have a portal to trigger the tests.



  • No labels