You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 18 Next »

This table summarizes each project's plan in regard to support of "Platform Maturity" in Jakarta Release. The data below are extracted from each project plan.

The Platform Maturity recommendations are documented in Platform Maturity Requirements (and sub-pages) from Jason Hunt

Legend

Color code:

  • Red: below maturity level
  • Yellow: same maturity.
  • Green: improved maturity level.

M1 Actual represents the assessment before M1. M1 Target represents, at M1 date, what the team plans to implement. M4 result represents what has been really implemented at M4 date . All these fields are self-assessed by the team.

CII Badging Tracking: http://tlhansen.us/onap/cii.html


AREA

Design / Run-Time

Performance

(min: Level 2 for closed-loop project; 0 for others)

Stability

(min: level 2 all projects)

Resiliency

(min: level 2 for runtime, level 1 others)

Security

(min: Project Level 2, 70% at silver)

Scalability

(min: level 1 for runtime projects)

Manageability

(min: level 2 all projects)

Usability

(min: level 2 all projects)

Min TSC Recommendations
M1 Actual

M1 Target

M4 resultM1 ActualM1 TargetM4 resultM1 ActualM1 TargetM4 resultM1 ActualM1 TargetM4 resultM1 ActualM1 TargetM4 resultM1 ActualM1 TargetM4 resultM1 ActualM1 TargetM4 result
Project Name





















A&AIR1111112221+ (75% toward silver)1+ (75% toward silver)1+ (75% toward silver)111

1


11111
Common Controller SDKR0

NA

2

1+ (82% towards silver)

NA

2

2

CPSR0001 (Note #4)1(Note #4)1(Note #4)2221+1+2+(~83% Gold)111222222
DCAED & R1112222221+ (96% Silver)1+ (~96% Silver)1+ (~98% Silver; ~ 61% Gold)1111+1+1+

1+

(see Note#1)

1+1+
DMaaPR111222222

1+

1+1+1111+1+1+111+
HolmesR2221111+1+1+1+1+1+1111111+1+1+
Microservices BusR222222222111222222222
ModelingD/R11
22
22
1+ (96% Silver)1+ (96% Silver)
11
22
22
Multi VIM/CloudR111222222222111111222
ONAP CLID & R1

1

2

1.5 Note #2

1

1

2 Note #2

ONAP Optimization FrameworkR111111222

1+

(85% towards silver)

1+

(85% towards silver)

1+

(85% towards silver)

111111111
ONAP Usecase UI ProjectR111111222111111111222
Policy Framework Project ProposalD & R

D: 1

R: 2



2



D: 2

R: 2



2 (silver)

1



2



2

SDN-CR0

1

2

1+ (82% towards silver)

1

2

2

Service Design & CreationD000

2

(Note #4)

2

(Note #4)

2

(Note #4)

1

11

1

(Note #5)

1

(Note #5)

1

(Note #5)

111

1

(Note #6)

11111
Service OrchestratorR11

1+

Added more CSIT and SO gating increased the stability of the releases.

1+
22

1+

(89% towards Silver)

1+

(89% towards Silver)


11
11
11
VFCR11
11
22
1+(93% Silver)1+(93% Silver)
11
22
22
VNF SDKD0

1

1

1.5




1

1

2

(Note #7)




Note 1: Level2 - Swagger definition completed for all component exposing API's. Component API's standardized with ONAP API Common Versioning Strategy for majority of DCAE component with some exception (older platform components)

Note 2: CLI https enabled, direct vaulnerability cleared with avaiable new 3rd party versions, but silver badge is not applied yet. so given with 1.5. increased manageability by providing additional commands already. usability increased with provided web console, linux console and direct mode

Note 4: Assumption is that platform 72 hour test is run by Integration team

Note 5: plus AAF-generated certificate and HTTPS mode by default.

Note 6: logging spec very close to 1.2;

Note 7: VNFSDK integrate OPNFV Dovetail and ONAP CLI to run the xNF Test cases and VNFSDK also have a portal to trigger the tests.



  • No labels