You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 80 Next »

Service Orchestration Workflow Development and Testing~The September Developers Event is for ONAP developers, by ONAP developers. Your contributions and needs are what will drive the agenda for all of these sessions.  To build the agenda for the we are soliciting Topics for discussion from the community.  Ideally these are questions that you need a deeper understanding of in order to make progress or deep-dive information sharing in a particular area.

Topic Template - Cut&Paste as needed

Topic/Question Name

  • Description: Description of the topic and the objective/outcome desired at the end of the discussion.
  • Topic Leader: The person that is knowledgeable enough to lead and moderate this discussion.
  • Volunteer Note Taker: First Last  email
  • Estimated Duration:
  • Link to data Source (if applicable)


INSTRUCTIONS:  

Please edit the section below and add any topics (using the template) that you would like to lead and/or attend. List the topic, and your name. If there is a topic that you would like discuss, but you do not feel that you can lead it, please list the topic below and indicate that you are "Interested in Attending", then indicate TBD as the "Topic Leader"

IMPORTANT DATES

Community Members provide Topic recommendations Aug. 3 - Sept. 10

Attendees self-select Topics of interest Sept. 11 - 15

Agenda set Sept. 18

TOPIC RECOMMENDATIONS


Amsterdam M4 Code Freeze Milestone Review

  • Description: M4 Code Freeze Review of all Amsterdam Projects. TSC will vote on the projects and depending on the findings, TSC will need to decide on:
        1. projects who pass M4
        2. projects that will need to be removed from Amsterdam
        3. projects that will need some adjustements

Training: On the Importance of adopting Scrum and Estimating

  • Description: Discussion on the benefits of applying Scrum techniques and Poker Planning for Estimating.
    1. Why is Scrum important for the Team. How to apply Scrum for distributed Team
    2. You can't swallow more that you can shew: Estimating with Poker Planning will make the team more realistic.
  • Date: TBD
  • Topic Leader: Gildas Lanilis gildas.lanilis@huawei.com
  • Volunteer Note Taker: 
  • Estimated Duration: 2 hours
  • Link to data Source (if applicable): Gildas will publish deck prior to training.
  • Interested to attend:
    • Gildas Lanilis

Beijing Release Calendar Proposal

  • Description: Review of Beijing Release Calendar Proposal
  • Topic Leader: Gildas Lanilis gildas.lanilis@huawei.com
  • Volunteer Note Taker: First Last  email
  • Estimated Duration: 30-45 minutes
  • Link to data Source (if applicable)
  • Interested to attend:


Enforcing an "Upstream first" approach to ONAP

  • Description: Description of the topic and the objective/outcome desired at the end of the discussion.
  • Topic Leader: The person that is knowledgeable enough to lead and moderate this discussion.
  • Volunteer Note Taker: First Last  email
  • Estimated Duration:
  • Link to data Source (if applicable)
  • Interested to attend:

External Open Source collaboration (OPNFV, ODL, etc.) and required actions 

  • Description: Description of the topic and the objective/outcome desired at the end of the discussion.
  • Topic Leader: The person that is knowledgeable enough to lead and moderate this discussion. (Jamil Chawki for OPNFV)
  • Volunteer Note Taker: First Last  email
  • Estimated Duration:
  • Link to data Source (if applicable)
  • Interested to attend:

External Standards Coordination and required actions with a different SDO 

Joint Architecture/Usecase subcommittees' meeting 

  • Description: Jointly identify key features and requirements exposed by the R2 use case and/or by the release 
  • Topic Leader: Alla Goldner/Chris Donley
  • Volunteer Note Taker: First Last  email
  • Estimated Duration:
  • Link to data Source (if applicable)
  • Interested to attend:
    • Vimal Begwani
    • Margaret Chiosi
    • Andrei Kojukhov
    • Gil Hellmann

Joint Architecture/Usecase/Modeling subcommittees' meeting 

  • Description: First synchronization on Release plans
  • Topic Leader: Alla Goldner/Chris Donley/Hui Deng
  • Volunteer Note Taker: First Last  email
  • Estimated Duration:
  • Link to data Source (if applicable)
  • Interested to attend:

ONAP security subcommittees' meeting 

  • Description: A discussion and feedback on ONAP security topics:  Static Code Scanning; CII Badiging program certification feedback (CLAMP team); Credential Management
  • Topic Leader: Stephen Terrill; (together with a CLAMP team memember)
  • Volunteer Note Taker: First Last  email
  • Estimated Duration: 1 hour
  • Link to data Source (if applicable)
  • Interested to attend:

R2 (Beijing) Architecture

  • Description: A discussion to firm-up open issues in the R2 architecture and status.
    • Get alignment on Orchestration (Resource / Service Orchestration)
    • Get a better alignment between App-c and VF-C controllers
    • Agree on high level objectives and guidelines for introducing new controller
  • Topic Leader: Vimal Begwani & Jamil Chawki
  • Volunteer Note Taker: First Last  email
  • Estimated Duration: 1 hour presentation for information of current state, but also a more indeep parallel workshop.
  • Link to data Source (if applicable)
  • Interested to attend:

R2 (Beijing) use cases/platform capabilities first presentation to the TSC 

  • Description: Outcomes of R2 related discussions
  • Topic Leader: Alla Goldner/Chris Donley
  • Volunteer Note Taker: First Last  email
  • Estimated Duration: 1 hour
  • Link to data Source (if applicable)
  • Interested to attend:


Usecase subcommittee meeting 

  • Description: R2 desired ONAP Platform capabilities and use cases to show those capabilities 
  • Topic Leader: Alla Goldner
  • Volunteer Note Taker: First Last  email
  • Estimated Duration: 2 hours
  • Link to data Source (if applicable)
  • Interested to attend:
    • Vimal Begwani
    • Margaret Chiosi
    • Andrei Kojukhov



Installation hands-on

  • Description: Sharing on ONAP installation
  • Topic Leader: The person that is knowledgeable enough to lead and moderate this discussion.
  • Volunteer Note Taker: First Last  email
  • Estimated Duration: 2h
  • Link to data Source (if applicable)
  • Interested to attend:

Kubernetes ONAP deployment overview and hands-on

Modeling


Residential vCPE Use-Case deep dive

  • Description: Description of the call flows used for one use-case for R1 (Residential vCPE)
  • Topic Leader: Yoav Kluger, Kang Xi
  • Volunteer Note Taker: First Last  email
  • Estimated Duration: 1h
  • Link to data Source (if applicable)
  • Interested to attend:


VoLTE Use-Case deep dive


Microservice Bus Tutorial

  • Description: MSB Tutorial for ONAP developers
  • Topic Leader: The person that is knowledgeable enough to lead and moderate this discussion.
  • Volunteer Note Taker:  HuabingZhao
  • Estimated Duration: 1h 
  • Link to data Source (if applicable)
  • Interested to attend:

Introducing CLI Model engine &  Tutorial

  • Description: As part of this session, audience will learn about the CLI model engine capabilities and how to develop ONAP commands using it just by writing YAML file with zero line of code, CLI model engine produce Commands directly from YAML.
  • Topic Leader: user-67d6f
  • Volunteer Note Taker: user-67d6f
  • Estimated Duration: 1h 
  • Link to data Source (if applicable)
  • Interested to attend:

Integration / Testing

  • Description: In this session, we'll discuss the current ONAP quality, issues, available features, etc.,  based on what we have tested in CSIT, Developer lab, End to End Testing, etc.
  • Topic Leader: Helen Chen
  • Volunteer Note Taker: eric.debeau@orange.com
  • Estimated Duration: 2h 
  • Link to data Source (if applicable)
  • Interested to attend:

How to use ONAP Developer Lab

R2: Non-functional requirements proposals 

  • Description: Presenting and further gathering of R2 non-functional requirements as candidates for R2
  • Topic Leader: Alla Goldner, Chris Donley
  • Volunteer Note Taker: eric.debeau@orange.com
  • Estimated Duration: 1h 
  • Link to data Source (if applicable)
  • Interested to attend:
    • Vimal Begwani
    • Margaret Chiosi

ONAP Development Tutorial

  • Description: Development environment setup, testing, ONAP development flow, Vagrant, etc. will be introduced in this session.
  • Topic Leader: The person that is knowledgeable enough to lead and moderate this discussion.
  • Volunteer Note Taker: First Last  email
  • Estimated Duration: 2h 
  • Link to data Source (if applicable)
  • Interested to attend:

Control Loop - E2E

  • Description: Let's close the gaps from design to runtime for supporting current and future control loops.
  • Topic Leader: Pam Dragosh
  • Volunteer Note Taker: First Last  email
  • Estimated Duration: 2h 
  • Interested to attend:

LF Productivity and Process Town Hall Session

  • Description:  Everyone has their favorite tool they want to use to work and communicate more efficiently.   The LF IT Department gets requests to add new tools or functiuonaluty on an almost daily basis, but accomodating all of these isn't feasable.  We need a more complete strategy for supporting your needs and this Monday session is intended to gather community input and share ideas on what is working well and can be improved upon in the area of tools and processes.  NOTE: This is not a technical "how-to" session.
  • Topic Leader:Kenny Paul  Tech. Program Manager, The Linux Foundation
  • Volunteer Note Taker: First Last email
  • Estimated Duration: 1hr
  • Interested to attend:

Documentation: how to describe detailed call flows 

  • Description: To undestrand the various ONAP component inteactio, call flows description are very impôrtant. They are currenly used in various projects  and use-cases. Various tools are used to describe call flows with various levels of details. This session will present a way to describe some detailed call flows with API calls between various components using PlantUML.
  • Date: TBD
  • Topic Leader: eric.debeau@orange.com
  • Volunteer Note Taker: 
  • Estimated Duration: 30'
  • Interested to attend:
    • Gildas Lanilis
    • Vimal Begwani

Future Plan for the Development of Holmes

  • Description:  The basic analysis capability of Holmes will be available by R1. We want to discuss how to enhance the functionalities to make Holmes be able to support more use cases and scenarios. Besides, we want to have a brief introduction on the vision of a smarter and more general analysis application based on the big data components provided by the ONAP community. 
  • Topic Leader: Guangrong Fu
  • Volunteer Note Taker: First Last email
  • Estimated Duration: 1hr
  • Interested to attend:
    • Margaret Chiosi


End-to-End Model Driven VNF Lifecycle Management/Modeling

  • Description: As part of the VNF SDK project, VNF modeling subproject has been focusing on establishing a consistent end-to-end approach for VNF and VNF package modeling in R2. We have identified several starting point for standardization of these models. What we need to do next is to agree on what models and/or standards are going to be applicable at what stages of the VNF lifecycle.

    We will start with the VNF model, as it is seen by VNF developers, inclusive of compute/storage/network hardware requirements, telemetry and policy specification, and identified how this information is ingested and trasformed into other models as part as part of VNF on-boarding (SDC), instantiation (SO/VF-C/Optimization/Policy) and operation (APPC/VFC/Optimization/Policy).

    We will also need to understand how policies and telemetry apply across the VNF management lifecycle, at what point they are defined, who gets to define them and how they are blended/federated with policies already provided during VNF on-boarding.
  • Topic Leader: Alexander Vul (Intel)/TBD (ATT)
  • Volunteer Note Taker: TBD
  • Estimated Duration: 3-4 hours
  • Link to data Source (if applicable)
  • Interested to attend:


Enhancing ONAP to orchestrate container VNFs using container orchestration as VIMs

  • Description: Release 1 ONAP instantiates VNFs as VMs in compute farm using VIMs such as Openstack which manages VM. Increasing VNF density on each node, need for multiple networks/slices, Services using SFC and reduced bringup & network latency requirements in market such as 5G and vCPE  are driving container based VNFs.  This project proposal is to enhance ONAP to support VNFs as containers in addition to VNFs as VMs by container orchestration as VIM instead of VM manager like openstack.
    • Objective/Outcome desired:
      • Get consensus on crawl/walk/run direction.
      • Get agreement on K8S as container VIM in R2
      • Get feedback on proposed architecture and changes to various ONAP projects.
      • Get an understanding that VNFs as container is needed for ONAP R-2 use cases(5G-RAN and vCPE)


DCAE New Features and Enhancements for Beijing and Future Releases

  • Description: Discussion for new/enhancing features and priorities for Beijing and future releases.  
  • Topic Leader:  Lusheng Ji
  • Volunteer Note Taker: First Last  email
  • Estimated Duration: 2 Hours
  • Link to data Source (if applicable)
  • Interested to attend:
    • Vimal Begwani
    • Margaret Chiosi
    • Gil Hellmann

SDC: R2 Backlog Discussion

  • Description: Presenting and further gathering of R2 candidate requirements
  • Topic Leader: David Shadmi / Michael Lando
  • Volunteer Note Taker: 
  • Estimated Duration: 2 hours
  • Link to data Source (if applicable)
  • Interested to attend:


VID: R2 Backlog Discussion

  • Description: Presenting and further gathering of R2 candidate requirements
  • Topic Leader: David Shadmi 
  • Volunteer Note Taker: 
  • Estimated Duration: 1 hours
  • Link to data Source (if applicable)
  • Interested to attend:

AAI: Graph DB Evolution

  • Description: Discuss Beijing plans to move to JanusGraph, migration strategies, etc.
  • Topic Leader: Jimmy Forsyth
  • Volunteer Note Taker: 
  • Estimated Duration: 1 hours
  • Link to data Source (if applicable)
  • Interested to attend:

Service Orchestration Workflow Development and Testing

  • Description: Review of workflow development methods and tools for SO
  • Topic Leader: Rob Daugherty (rd472p@att.com) / Seshu Kumar (seshu.kumar.m@huawei.com)
  • Volunteer Note Taker:
  • Estimated Duration: 1 hour
  • Link to data Source (if applicable)
  • Interested to attend:


Workshop Title: ONAP Multi Cloud Architectural vision for R2 and beyond

Goal:                               Advance Multi Cloud beyond the current proxy implementation to address ONAP platform level issues across all use cases

Moderator(s):                 VMware, Wind River

Primary Contact:           Ramki Krishnan, VMware, ramkik@vmware.com

Interested in Attending:

  • Vimal Begwani - AT&T
  • Margaret Chiosi - Huawei
  • Sastry Isukapalli - AT&T
  • Ankitkumar Patel - AT&T
  • Danny Lin - VMware
  • Sumit Verdi - VMware
  • Xihui Li - VMware
  • Bin Hu - AT&T
  • Gil Hellmann - Wind River

Topic 1:   Multi-Cloud Architectural Vision Introduction

Description:   This session will focus on discussion of evolution of the Multi Cloud framework for R2 and beyond, to address some of the platform gaps and move towards a more extensible and consistent cloud mediation layer. We would like to introduce a few key focus areas for this evolution, both in term of the use cases, architectural design principles, and integrations.

Architectural focus: Model Driven API for cloud infrastructure, Standardized cloud telemetry management, and policy driven cloud agnostic deployment.

Deep-dive topics (2, 3 and 4) towards achieving this vision are listed below for convenience

  • Standardized Infrastructure class statistics Model
  • Towards a performance-aware and portable cloud-agnostic infrastructure
  • Architectural options for Multi-vendor SDN Controller and Multi Cloud Deployments in a DC

Suggested Audience:     ONAP-OF, OOM, SDN-C, SO, VF-C, APP-C, DMaaP

Estimated Duration:        2 hrs.

Desired Scheduling:       Before topics 2, 3, 4, Architecture and TSC meetings.

Topic Lead               :       VMware

Topic 2:   Standardized Infrastructure Class statistics Model

Description:                   This session will focus on a hierarchical cloud-platform-aware architectural framework with separation of collection, storage, processing functions and real-time vs historical analytics components. In this framework, Multi Cloud will deliver a standardized infrastructure class statistics model for driving ONAP component/VNF placement/change management across distributed DC multi cloud instances through ONAP-OF, DCAE and other components. The benefit to ONAP platform, across all use cases, will be delivering the best performance and security while minimizing cost.

Suggested Audience:     ONAP-OF, DCAE, A&AI, Policy, OOM, SDN-C, DMaaP

Estimated Duration:        1 hrs.

Desired Scheduling:       After Topic 1 and Before Architecture and TSC meetings.

Topic Lead               :       AT&T

Presenters               :       VMware, Wind River, AT&T, Intel

Interested in Attending:

  • Gil Hellmann - Wind River

Topic 3:  Towards a performance-aware and portable cloud-agnostic infrastructure

Description:                    Multi-vendor cloud portability and interoperability while delivering performance is a mandatory feature of distributed DC deployments. The practical challenge in achieving this goal is the lack of standardization of Platform-aware and QoS features, for example extra specs in OpenStack, which results in a vertically integrated solution. This session will focus on how Multi Cloud can offer policy standardization and translation as a microservice for platform-aware and QoS features (hard-guarantee, min-guarantee, best effort etc.) for addressing this challenge and how NFV application classes such as IMS/EPC Control/Data Plane can benefit from this framework.

Suggested Audience:    VNF Requirements/Modelling, A&AI, Policy, SO, VF-C, APP-C, SDC

Estimated Duration:       1 hrs.

Desired Scheduling:      After Topic 1 and Before Architecture and TSC meetings.

Topic Lead               :      Bin Yang, Wind River, bin.yang@windriver.com 

Presenters               :      Wind River, Intel, VMware (to confirm)

Interested in Attending:

  • Gil Hellmann - Wind River

Topic 4:   Architectural options for Multi-vendor SDN Controller and Multi Cloud Deployments in a DC

Description:                    Multi-vendor components in a DC including underlay, overlay, gateway and SDN Controllers for the same pose various architectural challenges in terms interoperability, security etc. This session will focus on an in depth analysis of the architectural options including related efforts such as OpenStack Gluon. This proposal also addresses communication latency-bound multi-side physical DCs which can be treated as a single virtual DC for management purposes.

Suggested Audience:    SDN-C, SO, VF-C, APP-C, SDC

Estimated Duration:       1 hrs.

Desired Scheduling:      After Topic 1 and Before Architecture and TSC meetings.

Topic Lead               :      VMware

Presenters               :      Huawei, AT&T (to confirm), VMware, Intel




  • No labels