Draft.
Project Name:
- Proposed name for the project: ONAP Operations Manager
- Proposed name for the repository: oom
Project description:
This proposal introduces the ONAP Platform OOM (ONAP Operations Manager) – which initially includes a manager for cross-technology orchestration and container orchestration. It is a framework on which a complete set of OAM capabilities for the ONAP platform components. The OOM will unify the deployment, management and control capabilities for ONAP, including all components, the data messaging fabric as well as the micro-services (including collectors, analytics, UI apps, etc.) to be on-boarded onto the platform. The OOM addresses the current lack of consistent platform-wide method in managing software components, their health, resiliency and other lifecycle management functions. With the OOM, service providers will have a single dashboard/UI to deploy & un-deploy the entire (or partial) ONAP platform, view the different instances being managed and the state of each component, monitor actions that have been taken as part of a control loop (e.g., scale in-out, self-heal), and trigger other control actions like capacity augments.
The primary benefits of this approach are as follows:
- Flexible Platform Deployment - While current ONAP deployment automation enables the entire ONAP to be created, more flexibility is needed to support the dynamic nature of getting ONAP instantiated, tested and operational. Specifically, we need the capability to repeatedly deploy, un-deploy, and make changes onto different environments (dev, system test, DevOps, production), for both platform as a whole or on an individual component basis. To this end, we are introducing the ONAP Operations Manager with orchestration capabilities into the deployment, un-deployment and change management process associated with the platform.
- State Management of ONAP platform components – Our initial health checking of Components and software modules are done manually and lack consistency. We are proposing key modules/services in each ONAP Component to be able to self-register/discovered into the ONAP Operations Manager, which in turn performs regular health checks and determines the state of the Components/software.
- Platform Operations Orchestration / Control Loop Actions – Currently there is a lack of event-triggered corrective actions defined for platform components. The ONAP Operations Manager will enable DevOps to view events and to manually trigger corrective actions. The actions might be simple initially – stop, start or restart the container. Over time, more advanced control loop automation, triggered by policy, will be built into the ONAP Operations Manager.
Proposed ONAP Operations Manager Functional Architecture:
- UI/Dashboard – this provides DevOps users a view of the inventory, events and state of what is being managed by the ONAP Operations Manager, and the ability to manually trigger corrective actions on a component. The users can also deploy ONAP instances, a component, or a change to a software module within a component.
- API handler – this supports NB API calls from external clients and from the UI/Dashboard
- Inventory & data store – tracks the inventory, events, health, and state of the ONAP instances and individual components
- ONAP Lifecycle Manager – this is a model-driven orchestration engine for deploying/un-deploying instances and components. It will trigger downstream plugin actions such as instantiate VMs, create containers, stop/restart actions, etc. Target implementation should aim at TOSCA as the master information model for deploying/managing ONAP Platform components.
- SB Interface Layer – these are a collection of plugins to support actions and interactions needed by the ONAP Operations Manager to ONAP instances and other external cloud related resources – plugins may include Openstack, Docker, Kubernetes, Chef, Ansible, etc.
- Service & Configuration Registry – this function performs the registry and discovery of components/software to be managed as well as the subsequent health check on each registered component/software
Scope:
- In scope: ONAP Platform lifecycle management & automation through containers, i.e.
- Platform Deployment: Automated deployment/un-deployment of ONAP instance(s) / Automated deployment/un-deployment of individual platform components
- Platform Monitoring & healing: Monitor platform state, Platform health checks, fault tolerance and self-healing
- Platform Scaling: Platform horizontal scalability
- Platform Upgrades: Platform upgrades
- Platform Configurations: Manage overall platform components configurations
- Platform migrations: Manage migration of platform components
- Out of scope: support of container networking for VNFs. The project is about containerization of the ONAP platform itself.=
Architecture Alignment:
- How does this project fit into the rest of the ONAP Architecture?
- The ONAP Operations Manager (OOM) is used to deploy, manage and automate ONAP platform components operations.
- How does this align with external standards/specifications?
- At target, TOSCA should be used to model platform deployments and operations.
- Are there dependencies with other open source projects?
- Options could be Cloudify, Kubernetes, Docker, and others.
- The OOM will have dependency on the current proposed "Common Controller Framework" (CommServ 2) project and will leverage its software framework
- The current proposed "System Integration and Testing" (Integration) Project might have a dependency on this project - use OOM to deploy/undeploy/change the test environments, including creation of the container layer.
Resources:
- Primary Contact Person: David Sauvageau (Bell Canada)
- Munish Agarwak (Ericsson)
- John Ng (AT&T)
- Arthur Berezin (Gigaspaces)
- John Murray (AT&T)
- Christopher Rath (AT&T)
- Roger Maitland (Amdocs)
- Jérôme Doucerain (Bell Canada)
- Marc-Alexandre Choquette (Bell Canada)
Alexis De Talhouët (Bell Canada)
- Mike Elliot (Amdocs)
- Mike Nguyen (Amdocs)
- Catherine Lefevre (AT&T)
- TBD (Orange)
Other Information:
- link to seed code (if applicable)
- Vendor Neutral
- if the proposal is coming from an existing proprietary codebase, have you ensured that all proprietary trademarks, logos, product names, etc., have been removed?
- Meets Board policy (including IPR)
Use the above information to create a key project facts section on your project page
Key Project Facts
Project Name:
- JIRA project name: ONAP Operations Manasger
- JIRA project prefix: oom
Repo name: oom
Lifecycle State: Incubation
Primary Contact: TBD
Project Lead: TBD
mailing list tag oom
Committers (Name - Email - IRC):
- John Murray - jfm@research.att.com
- Christopher Rath - car@research.att.com
- Jérôme Doucerain - jerome.doucerain@bell.ca
- Alexis de Talhouët - alexis.de_talhouet@bell.ca - adetalhouet
- Mike Elliot - mike.elliott@amdocs.com
- Mike Nguyen - mike.nguyen@amdocs.com
*Link to TSC approval:
Link to approval of additional submitters: