- Date and Time: 2019, July 8th, 9pm~10pm Beijing Time, 9am~10am US Eastern
- Meeting Room: https://zoom.us/j/645982535
- Meeting Recording:
- Meeting Chat Log:
Agenda:
- AAI reverse engineering discussion - PNF
- Dublin release model review
Material:
Minutes:
- AAI reverse engineering discussion - PNF
- review the PNF instance model from AAI reverse engineering: Example: PNF in AAI
- compare the PNF instance model with PnfRegistration event documented at: VES 7.1#1.2.39PnfRegistration
- questions:
- should SoftwareVersion be modeled as datatype instead of class ?(also applied to IpAddress objects as well)
- should we remove the group classes?
- should we create root models like interfaces for classes like LagInterface and PInterface to simplify the model?
- is there any relevant concept in the existing model with the interfaces, e.g., connection point / port, and we should align the term?
- not all the attributes in the PnfRegistration event (e.g., lastServiceDate, manufactureDate) are stored in AAI model (see 5G - PNF Plug and Play: step 30 for more information), why? (different use cases store different information?)
- what's the relationship between PNF instance model and PNFD? e.g., is the pnfName coming from the PNFD?
- logic behind the pnfName/pnfName2/pnfName2Source design (fix the pnfdId issue?)
- AP:
- update the wiki page (Example: PNF in AAI) with the PnfRegistration table
- provide comparison results for further contact
- Dublin release model review
- review the table
- online updates of service model items and add a new column about modeling priority
