LF Antitrust
See also / Co-Located
Goals
- share information between
- O-RAN-SC Non-RT-RIC
- O-RAN-SC OAM
- O-RAN-SC O-DU
- O-RAN-SC SIM
- O-RAN-SC INT
- O-RAN-SC AI/ML
- ONAP CCSDK/SDNC/SDN-R
- ONAP Usecases
- ONAP Req & ONAP TSC committees
- LFN
![(wink)](/s/z10khv/8804/xgjkrn/_/images/icons/emoticons/wink.svg)
Recording
Discussion items
Time | Item | Who | Notes |
|
---|
00:00 | Admin | | Next meetings: Please follow the calendar |
|
00:00 | O-RAN-SC | O-RAN-SC PTLs | - Continuing as per last week :
- Alot of work in JDK 17 & Springboot 3 updates
- Consolidating PM data exposure in new repo for RAN PM functions
- (R1) Service Exposure & Management
- CAPIF Aligned Service Registry
- Secured/Sandbox execution environment
- Controlled access & exposure of service to/from rApps
(R1) Data Management & Exposure - File-based PM data → InfluxDB
- Previous focus on PM data - but will extend to other use cases too
- Aim to work with AIML project for Training (and Inference ?) data access
rApp Management - Built on ONAP “Automation Composition” model & platform to implement rApp use cases
- Inference Services in rApps
- Added a 'KServe Participant'
- rApp-specific extensions needed
- Packaging, Onboarding & Orchestration of rApps
- rApp-specific packaging & Onboarding
- Aim to align with / inform ongoing work in O-RAN (& OSC) about Common App packaging & Onboarding.
- (rApps with & without µService)
- Overlap with Service Exposure work to examine role of an rApp Manager to support controlled exposure & LCM of µService and non-µService parts of an rApp
Continued A1-Policy & A1-Enrichment-Information evolution (& R1-A1) - A1 Spec evolution
- A1-Policy work in ONAP (continues in ONAP London) - candidate for R1-A1(P)
- A1-EI management as part of DME - candidate for how to include A1-EI in R1-DME
- Sample use cases (rApps)
- Requirements Drivers for rApp/R1 development
- High degree of cross-project integration activity
Testing, Maintenance & Housekeeping - Function Test & Integration Test environment,
- Support integration, deployment & configuration of SMO/Non-RT-RIC related functions & usecases in OSC Integration env.
- Project coordination, Documentation, Delivery, Reporting, Cross-project alignment, Community demos, O-RAN Standardization support, etc.
- Re JDK17 Docker image sizes: Kamel Idir Any plans to use GraalVM-based images? John Keeney Looking closely at it, but don't feel we're ready yet.
- SIM: Alex Stancu
- Working on O-DU simulator with 3GPP Yang Models. Currently script-based to build custom images - avoids 3GPP licensing issues.
- script is ready
- new Sim-O-DU available
- PM File generation
- OAM: Martin Skorupski
- stndDefined examples for FM, CM ....
- Scripts for injecting 3GPP Yaml (VES) from external repos.
- under investigation: WG4 OFHM v11 → VES → stndDefined → RFC8040 (RESTCONF notification) → O-RAN OFHM yang
- O-DU: @Vidhu
- stndDefined plus O-RAN-SC yaml
- AI Martin - send definitions to Vidhu
- RSAC/SMO: David Kinsey
- demo by Amdocs for CI (closed source)
- INT: James Li(CMTI)
- looking for CI/CD/CT tools
- progress in O2 test cases - with x-testing-framework
|
|
00:00 | ONAP SON/slicing Use case | N.K. Shankaranarayanan | - ONAP SON uses case ... & others
- Coming together well now. ... counting down to M3
![(smile)](/s/z10khv/8804/xgjkrn/_/images/icons/emoticons/smile.svg) - See links below:
- Update
- CPS - how the code can be used?
- modification of yang (subset for needed use case) to be applied and
- other configurations (dataset as json)
- yangs can be also injected based on SDNC (NF yangs - in this case unmodified yangs)
- manual steps vs automation
- CPS demo: 2023-04-04 Meeting notes - Developer Wiki - Confluence (onap.org)
|
|
00:00 | ONAP/O-RAN-SC Cooperation/Alignment | | - N.K. Shankaranarayanan Presentation of slides discussed in past weeks at RSAC call today. See above.
- Slides:
- Excellent session to make people aware / motivated about overlaps, with concrete opportunity for better alignment & engagement.
- Seshu Kumar Mudiganti We also need to concentrate on Non functional aspects, such as scalability, security, energy usage. John Keeney Those are costly. Trade off against resources available for functional aspects. Do we need to find out if there is a preference for functional vs non-functional?
- Lots of hard work to do. We will try to identify concrete follow ups.
- Lets continue on the areas we already have good alignment, & strengthen focus on newer potential areas, as described int he slides.
|
|
00:51 | ONAP release (London) | | Some delays |
|
00:55 | Synergies? | | ONAP Jira - AI/ML releated? |
|
| Meeting ends |
|
|
|
00:00 | 3GPP copyright issue | | Still! "not ok" - how to use NETCONF YANGs from 3GPP and O-RAN Problem Statement might be not fully understood. Next step: Call with Magnus Buhrgard After the call and some emails: Magnus it preparing a call with 3GPP SA5 representatives and then another ONAP LS to 3GPP The topic is on the ONAP TSC agenda tomorrow: TSC 2022-09-08 > Magnus wont give up ![(smile)](/s/z10khv/8804/xgjkrn/_/images/icons/emoticons/smile.svg) |
|
Action items