Attendees
Informed
- Abhinav Singh
- Alessandro Gerardo D'Alessandro
- Amy Zwarico
- Andrea Buldorini
- Andy Mayer
- @Anh Le
- Claudio David Gasparini
- Damian Nowak
- Dibas Das
- @Dmytro Gassanov
- emmanuel sarris
- Fernando Oliveira
- Grzegorz Wielgosinski
- HariomGupta(HCL)
- Joachim Blixt
- John Keeney
- Kamel Idir
- user-7f92d
- Konrad Bańka
- Kuldeep Negi
- Lasse Kaihlavirta
- Lathishbabu Ganesan
- Manoj Nair
- Martin Skorupski
- marcin krasowski
- Michela Bevilacqua
- Paulo Costa
- Pawel Slowikowski
- Ruslan Kashapov
- Sonia Sangari
- Scott Blandford
- subhash kumar singh
- Swaminathan Seetharaman
- Timo Perala
- @Vidhu Pandey
- Zu Qiang (Ericsson)
- Sven van der Meer
Please add/remove yourself. Thanks!
See also
Goals
- share information between
- O-RAN-SC Non-RT-RIC
- O-RAN-SC OAM
- O-RAN-SC SMO
- ONAP CCSDK/SDNC/SDN-R
- LFN
Recording
Discussion items
Time | Item | Who | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
00:00 | Admin | Next meetings: 2021-04-21: John Keeney 2021-04-28: Martin Skorupski 2021-05-05: John Keeney 2021-05-12: Martin Skorupski | |
00:05 | O-RAN-SC | O-RAN-SC PTLs | Status reports:
|
00:15 | LFnetworking | Martin Skorupskimy personal understanding 2021-04-04:
Specs from 3GPP (core, N1, N2, N3, E1, F1, X?) and O-RAN (A1, O1(based on 3GPP), O2, OpenFrontaul, E2) @all: Please correct, in case of my misinterpretations. | |
00:10 | SMO functionality and alignment between ONAP and O-RAN SC | SMO functionality and alignment between ONAP and O-RAN SC
Some thoughts: https://www.lfnetworking.org/5g-super-blueprint/ | |
00:15 | Q/A | ||
00:16 | "A1 Proxy" | Pawel Slowikowski | more on A1 Proxy
|
00:20 | Architecture | Feedback notification to Policy
from Slack: Hi O-RAN-ONAP experts! Answer: We have a plan - but there are several options and it is not clear which one to choose follow-up question: What should be done with such notifications? potential use case: UE movement → clean up of Policies when moving from one Near-RT-RIC to the next Currently, we have only the status_notification_uri field in the policy preload available. But the http server is missing on the A1-P Consumer site (ONAP-PMS, SDNC/A1 Adapter) that will respond to this POST request (feedback) from the Near RT RIC site. How is the community vision on this topic? I wonder that this "feedback" should be handler by R-APPs or the PMS will be responsible for that? Answer: might be use case driven I saw that the community not use this slack channel but this is my first attempt to start some discussion here. Also this topic can be handler during our weekly call we will be better
| |
00:23 | UI for A1- Policy | There is a UI in O-RAN-SC Non-RT-RIC
| |
00:34 | ves:stdnDefined | Damian Nowak | Examples:
|
END | |||
00:?? | Use Case | @all | OSC Proposed e2e integration use case: O-RU FH connection recovery
<bridge dropped recording stopped at this point. Most participants reconnected once bridge started again>
|