You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 2 Next »

The content of this template is expected to be fill out for M1 Release Planning Milestone.


Overview

Project NameEnter the name of the project
Target Release NameHonolulu
Project Lifecycle StateIncubation
Participating Company AT&T, Amdocs, Bell Canada, CMCC, DT, Ericsson, Fujitsu, Huawei, Intel, Lumina Networks, Nokia, Orange, Samsung, Tech Mahindra, Verizon

Scope

What is this release trying to address?

Improve the platform maturity of SO project and cleanup some of the key technical backlogs.

Requirements

Explained in detail in the below sections.

Minimum Viable Product

Deliver all the needed docker images and DB to support SO core functionality and the needed scripts for deploying it in OOM.

Functionalities

List the functionalities that this release is committing to deliver by providing a link to JIRA Epics and Stories. In the JIRA Priority field, specify the priority (either High, Medium, Low). The priority will be used in case de-scoping is required. Don't assign High priority to all functionalities.


Requirements Epics for Honoloulu, impacting SO


Use Cases :

Greetings, As per the new process set in place, we need to have the TSC must have requirements also to be completed for us to qualify for the release.



Functional Requirements :

Requirement

SO Epic(s) / Story(ies)M1 Scope and clarification
Java 11 upgrade
Java 11 upgrade to be supported by the SO components, trace elements scanned by Security subcommittee needs to be checked
Python 3
trace elements scanned by Security subcommittee needs to be checked













18 Non functionals :

10 - TSC MUST HAVE (please indicate where you plan to contribute)

Requirement EpicTSC PrioritySO Epic(s) / Story(ies)Committed Contributors








































1 - TSC PRIORITY 2 Continuity (please indicate where you plan to contribute)





7- TSC PRIORITY 3 PTL GO/NO GO (please indicate where you plan to contribute)























SO Backlog Overview - Not committed for the release (except for stories that have been captured in the above table), best effort

Key Summary T Updated Assignee P Status
Loading...
Refresh

Longer term roadmap

SO aims to highest level of orchestration which is model driven and generic enough to both traditional and Cloud Native scenarios alike.

Release Deliverables

Indicate the outcome (Executable, Source Code, Library, API description, Tool, Documentation, Release Note, etc) of this release.

Deliverable NameDeliverable Description
SO Docker ImagesDocker Images, details  can be found below
SO libslibs


Sub-Components

List all sub-components part of this release.
Activities related to sub-components must be in sync with the overall release.

Sub-components are repositories and are consolidated in a single centralized place. Edit the Release Components name for your project in the centralized page.

  • onap/so/api-handler-infra
  • onap/so/bpmn-infra
  • onap/so/catalog-db-adapter
  • onap/so/openstack-adapter
  • onap/so/request-db-adapter
  • onap/so/sdc-controller
  • onap/so/sdnc-adapter
  • onap/so/so-monitoring
  • onap/so/vfc-adapter
  • onap/so/sol003-adapter
  • onap/so/nssmf-adapter
  • onap/so/mso-cnf-adapter
  • onap/so/etsi-nfvo

Architecture

High level architecture diagram

Platform Maturity

Please fill out the centralized wiki page: Guilin Release Platform Maturity


Team Internal Milestone (Tentative)

MilestoneDescription DateComments





































































































  • API Incoming Dependencies

List the API this project is expecting from other projects.
Prior to Release Planning review, Team Leads must agreed on the date by which the API will be fully defined. The API Delivery date must not be later than the release API Freeze date.

Prior to the delivery date, it is a good practice to organize an API review with the API consumers.

API NameAPI DescriptionAPI Definition DateAPI Delivery dateAPI Definition link (i.e.swagger)










  • API Outgoing Dependencies

API this project is delivering to other projects.

API NameAPI DescriptionAPI Definition DateAPI Delivery dateAPI Definition link (i.e.swagger)





  • Third Party Products Dependencies

Third Party Products mean products that are mandatory to provide services for your components. Development of new functionality in third party product may or not be expected.
List the Third Party Products (OpenStack, ODL, RabbitMQ, ElasticSearch,Crystal Reports, ...).

NameDescriptionVersion






In case there are specific dependencies  (Centos 7 vs Ubuntu 16. Etc.) list them as well.

Base docker images with approved set of License to be used to construct SO base images.


  • Testing and Integration Plans

Provide a description of the testing activities (unit test, functional test, automation,...) that will be performed by the team within the scope of this release.

Describe the plan to integrate and test the release deliverables within the overall ONAP system.
Confirm that resources have been allocated to perform such activities.

  • validate uses cases and pairwise testing of SO with other components
  • enhance CSIT to include more tests
  • Gaps

This section is used to document a limitation on a functionality or platform support. We are currently aware of this limitation and it will be delivered in a future Release.
List identified release gaps (if any), and its impact.

Gaps identifiedImpact
To fill outTo fill out
  • Known Defects and Issues

Please refer to Frankfurt Defect Status  – To be updated when avail


  • Risks

List the risks identified for this release along with the plan to prevent the risk to occur (mitigation) and the plan of action in the case the risk would materialized (contingency).

Please update any risk on the centralized wiki page - Frankfurt Risks – To be updated when avail

  • Resources

Fill out the Resources Committed to the Release centralized page.

  • Release Milestone

The milestones are defined at the Release Level and all the supporting project agreed to comply with these dates.

  • Team Internal Milestone

This section is optional and may be used to document internal milestones within a project team or multiple project teams. For instance, in the case the team has made agreement with other team to deliver some artifacts on a certain date that are not in the release milestone, it is erecommended to provide these agreements and dates in this section.

It is not expected to have a detailed project plan.

DateProjectDeliverable
To fill outTo fill outTo fill out
  • Documentation, Training

Please update the following centralized wiki: Frankfurt Documentation – To be updated when avail

That includes

  • Team contributions to the specific document related to he project (Config guide, installation guide...).
  • Team contributions to the overall Release Documentation and training asset
  • High level list of documentation, training and tutorials necessary to understand the release capabilities, configuration and operation.
  • Documentation includes items such as:
    • Installation instructions
    • Configuration instructions
    • Developer guide
    • End User guide
    • Admin guide
    • ...

Note

The Documentation project will provide the Documentation Tool Chain to edit, configure, store and publish all Documentation asset.


Other Information

  • Vendor Neutral

If this project is coming from an existing proprietary codebase, ensure that all proprietary trademarks, logos, product names, etc. have been removed. All ONAP deliverables must comply with this rule and be agnostic of any proprietary symbols.

  • Free and Open Source Software

FOSS activities are critical to the delivery of the whole ONAP initiative. The information may not be fully available at Release Planning, however to avoid late refactoring, it is critical to accomplish this task as early as possible.
List all third party Free and Open Source Software used within the release and provide License type (BSD, MIT, Apache, GNU GPL,... ).
In the case non Apache License are found inform immediately the TSC and the Release Manager and document your reasoning on why you believe we can use a non Apache version 2 license.

Each project must edit its project table available at Project FOSS.


Charter Compliance

The project team comply with the ONAP Charter.

  • No labels