DRAFT PROPOSAL FOR COMMENTS
The content of this template is expected to be fill out for M1 Release Planning Milestone.
Info
Use the "Copy" and "Move" options (available under the ..., top right of this page) to duplicate this template into your project wiki.
Use the Wiki to document the release plan. Don't provide PowerPoint.
Use as much diagrams and flow charts as you need, directly in the wiki, to convey your message.
Overview
| Project Name | Enter the name of the project |
|---|---|
| Target Release Name | Dublin |
| Project Lifecycle State | Incubation |
| Participating Company | AMDOCS, AT&T, Bell Canada, Ericsson,Huawei, IBM, Tech Mahindra |
Scope
What is this release trying to address?
The primary focus of the ONAP release 4 (Dublin) is to advance platform maturity, with a focus on S3P (Scalabllity, Stability, Security and Performance).
Use Cases
SDNC will support the following use cases from previous releases:
- vFW
- vDNS
- vCPE
- VoLTE
- CCVPN
SDNC will also support the following additional use cases for Dublin:
- 5G
Minimum Viable Product
The following epics represent the minimum viable product for the Dublin SDNC release:
The following epics are considered stretch goals for the Dublin SDNC release. These are planned for Dublin, but may be scaled back or removed if necessary due to resource constraints.
Functionalities
Epics
The following epics are committed for the Dublin release
The following epics are considered stretch goals for the Dublin release. They are currently planned, but may be scaled back or cut if necessary due to resource constraints.
Stories
Longer term roadmap
One critical long term objective for the SDN-C project is support for integration with other third party SDN Controllers (e.g. Open Contrail), well as integration with the SDN Agent project from Open-O. For the Dublin release, since our primary goal is to support the use cases identified above and to improve platform maturity, the degree to which we support such integration will be dictated by the needs of those use cases. However, we do want to bear in mind that such integration is critical and will be included in our release plans going forward.
Release Deliverables
Indicate the outcome (Executable, Source Code, Library, API description, Tool, Documentation, Release Note...) of this release.
| Deliverable Name | Deliverable Description | Deliverable Location |
|---|---|---|
| SDNC Source Code | Source code for SDNC project | ONAP gerrit |
| SDNC Maven Artifacts | Compiled code that can be referenced in other projects as maven dependencies | ONAP Nexus |
| SDNC Docker Containers | Docker containers associated with SDNC project:
| ONAP Nexus |
| Documentation | User and developer guides | ONAP Wiki |
| SDNC CI/CD automation | Scripts to automate compilation and deployment of maven artifacts and docker containers | ONAP gerrit ONAP Jenkins |
Sub-Components
Subcomponents of each ONAP project may be found on the Resources and Repositories (Deprecated) page on this wiki. Please see the SDN-C section of that page for subcomponent list of SDN-C.
ONAP Dependencies
SDN-C depends on the following projects:
- Active and Available Inventory (A&AI)
- Common Controller SDK (CCSDK).
- Service Design and Creation (SDC)
- Data Movement as a Platform (DMaaP)
- Documentation
- Integration
- External API
- Modeling
- Multi VIM/Cloud
- Policy
Architecture
High level architecture diagram
The following diagram shows the high level architecture of SDNC:
The major architectural components of the SDN-C controller are:
- Device Data Models : Yang models that define interfaces to devices (virtual or physical) that the SDNC configures
- Service Network Data Models : Yang models that define data maintained within the SDNC about the network used by the set of services supported by this SDNC instance
- Service Chain Data Models : Yang models that define how services supported by an SDNC instance can be chained
- Service Data Models : Yang models that define data maintained within the SDNC for the set of services it supports
- Directed Graphs : programmable logic, updatable at run time with no restart, that define the behavior of the SDNC
- Service Logic Interpreter : module provided by CCSDK which allows platform to execute directed graphs
- API Handler : code (mostly generate from service Yang models) which implements RESTCONF API into SDNC. Most API handlers should follow the following pattern:
- Call directed graph named after invoked RPC, passing RESTCONF RPC parameters as Java Properties object.
- Return results from directed graph invocation as response to RESTCONF RPC
- Interface adaptors - code that allows directed graphs to invoke external interfaces
Platform Maturity
Refering to CII Badging Security Program and Platform Maturity Requirements, fill out the table below by indicating the actual level , the targeted level for the current release and the evidences on how you plan to achieve the targeted level.
| Area | Actual Level | Targeted Level for current Release | How, Evidences | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 0 | 0 | Awaiting guidance from Benchmark subcommittee |
|
| Stability | 0 | 1 | SDNC will perform 72 hour soak at component level. We assume that integration team will also do a 72 hour ONAP soak which includes SDNC. |
|
| Resiliency | 1 | 2 | In Beijing, CCSDK will support a clustered OpenDaylight configuration in Kubernetes, as well as a clustered database, to allow for automated detection and recovery within a site. SDNC will use that configuration to meet this requirement. See SDN-C Clustering on Kubernetes for further details |
|
| Security | 0 | 1 | SDNC will improve test coverage to > 50% |
|
| Scalability | 0 | 1 | SDNC can be scaled either by adding additional OpenDaylight containers and/or database containers, or by deploying multiple instances of SDNC cluster. |
|
| Manageability | 1 | 1 | SDNC will support ONAP standard logging. |
|
| Usability | 1 | 1 | See readthedocs and wiki. |
|
API Incoming Dependencies
| API Name | API Description | API Definition Date | API Delivery date | API Definition link (i.e.swagger) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A&AI : VNF | API used to read/write information about VNFs | Defined in seed code | Included in seed code | TBD |
| SDC : distribution | API used to distribute artifacts from SDC to subscribers | Defined in seed code | Included in seed code | TBD |
| DMaaP | API used to receive DHCP event notification | 8/23/17 | 8/23/17 | DMaaP API |
API Outgoing Dependencies
| API Name | API Description | API Definition Date | API Delivery date | API Definition link (i.e.swagger) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Healthcheck | API used to verify that platform is available and healthy | Included in seed code | Delivered in seed code | TBD (requested Confluence OPEN API to be installed so this can be published on ONAP Wiki) |
| Generic VNF API | API used to request resources for VNFs. Will be deprecated in Beijing in favor of Generic Resource API. | Included in seed code | Delivered in seed code | TBD (requested Confluence OPEN API to be installed so this can be published on ONAP Wiki) |
| Generic Resource API | API used to request resources for VNFs. This API is a superset of the generic VNF API, which it replaces | Included in Amsterdam release | Delivered in Amsterdam | TBD (requested Confluence OPEN API to be installed so this can be published on ONAP Wiki) |
Third Party Products Dependencies
| Name | Description | Version |
|---|---|---|
| OpenDaylight | OpenDaylight SDN Controller Platform | Fluorine |
Testing and Integration Plans
Provide a description of the testing activities (unit test, functional test, automation,...) that will be performed by the team within the scope of this release.
Describe the plan to integrate and test the release deliverables within the overall ONAP system.
Confirm that resources have been allocated to perform such activities.
Gaps
This section is used to document a limitation on a functionality or platform support. We are currently aware of this limitation and it will be delivered in a future Release.
List identified release gaps (if any), and its impact.
| Gaps identified | Impact |
|---|---|
| To fill out | To fill out |
Known Defects and Issues
Provide a link toward the list of all known project bugs.
Risks
List the risks identified for this release along with the plan to prevent the risk to occur (mitigation) and the plan of action in the case the risk would materialized (contingency).
| Risk identified | Mitigation Plan | Contingency Plan |
|---|---|---|
| To fill out | To fill out | To fill out |
Resources
Fill out the Resources Committed to the Release centralized page.
Release Milestone
The milestones are defined at the Release Level and all the supporting project agreed to comply with these dates.
Team Internal Milestone
The following table shows the major project milestones and intermediate milestones for the Dublin release.
| Milestone | Description | Date | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| M1 | End of release planning | Formal commitment to release scope | |
| Jan 22, 2019 | Release manager reviews worksheets to assess readiness for M1 milestone | |
| Jan 24, 2019 | ||
| M2 | Functionality Freeze | ||
| Feb 15, 2019 | ||
| Feb 19, 2019 | Release manager reviews worksheets to assess readiness for M2 milestone | |
| Feb 21, 2019 | ||
| M3 | API Freeze | ||
| March 8, 2019 | Last day to submit Dublin swagger / Yang changes to Gerrit | |
| March 12, 2019 | Release manager reviews worksheets to assess readiness for M3 milestone | |
| March 14, 2019 | ||
| M4 | Code Freeze | ||
| April 4, 2019 | Last day to submit Dublin code changes to Gerrit | |
| April 9, 2019 | Release manager reviews worksheets to assess readiness for M4 milestone, including the following checks:
| |
| April 11, 2019 | ||
| RC0 | Release Candidate 0 | ||
| April 19, 2019 | Last date to submit code fixes for release candidate 0 | |
| April 23, 2019 | ||
| April 23, 2019 | ||
| April 25, 2019 | ||
| RC1 | Release Candidate 1 | ||
| May 3, 2019 | Last date to submit code fixes for release candidate 1 | |
| May 7, 2019 | ||
| May 7, 2019 | ||
| May 9, 2019 | ||
| RC2 | Release Candidate 2 | ||
| May 17, 2019 | Last date to submit code fixes for final Dublin release (RC2) | |
| May 21, 2019 | ||
| May 21, 2019 | ||
| May 23, 2019 | ||
| Release Sign-Off | Final TSC Sign-Off | May 30, 2019 | Dublin Release Sign-Off |
Documentation, Training
- Highlight the team contributions to the specific document related to he project (Config guide, installation guide...).
- Highlight the team contributions to the overall Release Documentation and training asset
- High level list of documentation, training and tutorials necessary to understand the release capabilities, configuration and operation.
- Documentation includes items such as:
- Installation instructions
- Configuration instructions
- Developer guide
- End User guide
- Admin guide
- ...
Note
The Documentation project will provide the Documentation Tool Chain to edit, configure, store and publish all Documentation asset.
Other Information
Vendor Neutral
If this project is coming from an existing proprietary codebase, ensure that all proprietary trademarks, logos, product names, etc. have been removed. All ONAP deliverables must comply with this rule and be agnostic of any proprietary symbols.
Free and Open Source Software
FOSS activities are critical to the delivery of the whole ONAP initiative. The information may not be fully available at Release Planning, however to avoid late refactoring, it is critical to accomplish this task as early as possible.
List all third party Free and Open Source Software used within the release and provide License type (BSD, MIT, Apache, GNU GPL,... ).
In the case non Apache License are found inform immediately the TSC and the Release Manager and document your reasoning on why you believe we can use a non Apache version 2 license.
Each project must edit its project table available at Project FOSS.
Charter Compliance
The project team comply with the ONAP Charter.