The content of this template is expected to be fill out for M1 Release Planning Milestone.

Info

Use the "Copy" and "Move" options (available under the ..., top right of this page) to duplicate this template into your project wiki.
Use the Wiki to document the release plan. Don't provide PowerPoint.
Use as much diagrams and flow charts as you need, directly in the wiki, to convey your message.


Overview

Project NameEnter the name of the project
Target Release NameFrankfurt Release
Project Lifecycle StateEither Incubation, Core, Mature. Refer to ONAP Charter, section 3.3 Project Lifecycle for further information
Participating Company (Alphabetical order) AT&T, Amdocs, Bell Canada, CMCC, DT, Fujitsu, Huawei, Intel, Nokia, Orange, Samsung, Tech Mahindra 

Scope

What is this release trying to address?

  • Integrate the AAF and upgrade the APIs to Https - ATT
  • ETSI alignment improvements - Ericcson, Huawei, Verizon
    • SOL005 adaptation
    • SOL003 adaptation
  • PNF orchestration Enhancements - Ericcson, Huawei, Nokia
    • PNF sotware upgrade  
    • PNF PNP enhancement  
  • CCVPN Enhancement
    • MDONS support -  Fujitsu
    • Eline support - Bell, Huawei, CMCC
  • 5G Slicing - ATT, Amdocs, CMCC, Huawei, Wipro
  • CDS integration enhancement - ATT, Bell, Tech Mahindra
  • (SO Multi Cloud plugin improvements - Intel)
  • HPA -  Intel (Testing effort)
  • Component Upgrades to new Policy Lifecycle API : Resource commitment is being checked (ATT??)

Release Requirements

Features Being considered for F release (As per the resource availability):

SOL005 Adapter supports communication security
SOL005 Adapter supports NS/VNF Package Management and NS LCM
Multi-domain Optical Network Service Orchestration Support in SO
SOL002 Adapter - supports EM-triggered VNF/VNFC Management
SO Catalog Management Support
Frankfurt release planning milestone
Initiate/ Terminate slice service; Activate/deactivate Slice service
SO support of Network Slicing Demo in Frankfurt
ETSI Alignment Support - SOL003 Adapter Enhancement for Frankfurt
AAI update for VNF improvements
SO Multicloud plugin to Multicloud improvements
SO to CDS Enhancement for Generic Implementation
S3P improvement Requirements  
Upgrade the APIs to Policy


Minimum Viable Product

Same as was defined for E-alto, but is going to add AAF integration with external APIs updated to https.

Functionalities

List the functionalities that this release is committing to deliver by providing a link to JIRA Epics and Stories. In the JIRA Priority field, specify the priority (either High, Medium, Low). The priority will be used in case de-scoping is required. Don't assign High priority to all functionalities.

Epics

Key Summary T Created Updated Due Assignee Reporter P Status Resolution
Loading...
Refresh

Stories

Key Summary T Created Updated Due Assignee Reporter P Status Resolution
Loading...
Refresh


Longer term roadmap

The long term road map is to achieve all the goals outlined in the approved project proposal; to be fully model and standards driven, be agnostics and make no assumptions about the network. Support configuration and lifecyle management of VNF/VNFC in a generic fashion so that on-boarding any new VNF/VNFC is just a matter of configuration and data. Longer term items include:

  • Align to the controller architecture proposed by the architecture team.
  • Work with CDS team to converge on a single controller design tool
  • Support different types of clouds, currently only support Openstack;

Release Deliverables

Indicate the outcome (Executable, Source Code, Library, API description, Tool, Documentation, Release Note...) of this release.


Deliverable NameDeliverable DescriptionDeliverable Location
"App-c Image" Docker ContainerExecutableDocker images available on nexus3
Java Source CodeThe Java code for the main App-c components.appc Git repository
Deployment ScriptsLinux shell scripts and Maven pom files used to generate the Docker containers. appc/deployment Git repository
Directed Graph Xml Files (DGs)Xml files define the directed graphs which are installed to database during startup and are used to determine actions taken by app-c appc/deployment Git repository
Yang Model Files Yang files are used to define the LCM actionappc Git repository
Property Files Property files are used to define values that may need to be changed depending on the environment app-c is run in.appc Git repository
CDT toolan APP-C Design Tool enabling VNF owners to create templates and other artifacts used by APP-C Configure actions (used to apply a post-instantiation configuration) as well as other life cycle commandsappc/cdt Git repository
Parent RepoThe repository for the parents pom files.appc/parents Git repository

Sub-Components

List all sub-components part of this release.
Activities related to sub-components must be in sync with the overall release.

Sub-components are repositories and are consolidated in a single centralized place. Edit the Release Components name for your project in the centralized page.

onap/so/api-handler-infra

onap/so/bpmn-infra

onap/so/catalog-db-adapter

onap/so/openstack-adapter

onap/so/request-db-adapter

onap/so/sdc-controller

onap/so/sdnc-adapter

onap/so/so-monitoring

onap/so/vfc-adapter

onap/so/vnfm-adapter

Architecture

High level architecture diagram

At that stage within the Release, the team is expected to provide more Architecture details describing how the functional modules are interacting.

Indicate where your project fit within the ONAP Architecture diagram.

Block and sequence diagrams showing relation within the project as well as relation with external components are expected.

Anyone reading this section should have a good understanding of all the interacting modules.

Platform Maturity

Refering to CII Badging Security Program and Platform Maturity Requirements, fill out the table below by indicating the actual level , the targeted level for the current release and the evidences on how you plan to achieve the targeted level.

AreaActual LevelTargeted Level for current ReleaseHow, EvidencesComments
Performance11
  • 0 -- none
  • 1 – baseline performance criteria identified and measured
  • 2 & 3 – performance improvement plans created & implemented
Stability11
  • 0 – none
  • 1 – 72 hours component level soak w/random transactions
  • 2 – 72 hours platform level soak w/random transactions
  • 3 – 6 months track record of reduced defect rate
Resiliency22
  • 0 – none
  • 1 – manual failure and recovery (< 30 minutes)
  • 2 – automated detection and recovery (single site)
  • 3 – automated detection and recovery (geo redundancy)
Security22
  • 0 – none
  • 1 – CII Passing badge + 50% Test Coverage
  • 2 – CII Silver badge; internal communication encrypted; role-based access control and authorization for all calls
  • 3 – CII Gold
Scalability11
  • 0 – no ability to scale
  • 1 – single site horizontal scaling
  • 2 – geographic scaling
  • 3 – scaling across multiple ONAP instances
Manageability11
  • 1 – single logging system across components; instantiation in < 1 hour
  • 2 – ability to upgrade a single component; tracing across components; externalized configuration management
Usability11
  • 1 – user guide; deployment documentation; API documentation
  • 2 – UI consistency; usability testing; tutorial documentation


  • API Incoming Dependencies

List the API this project is expecting from other projects.
Prior to Release Planning review, Team Leads must agreed on the date by which the API will be fully defined. The API Delivery date must not be later than the release API Freeze date.

Prior to the delivery date, it is a good practice to organize an API review with the API consumers.

Prior to the delivery date, it is a good practice to organize an API review with the API consumers.

API Name

API Description

API Definition Date

API Delivery date

API Definition link (i.e.swagger)

Interface Type
SDCAPIs for distribute service modelsDefined in AmsterdamDelivered in Amsterdam

SO interfaces


Incoming and Out going
A&AIAPIs for inventory dataDefined in AmsterdamDelivered in Amsterdam

SO interfaces


Out Going
SDN-CAPIs for network controllerDefined in AmsterdamDelivered in Amsterdam

SO interfaces


Out going
APP-CAPIs for application controllerDefined in AmsterdamDelivered in Amsterdam

SO interfaces


Out Going
VF-CAPIs for Network ServiceDefined in AmsterdamDelivered in Amsterdam

SO interfaces


Out Going
Multi-VIMAPIs for Multi-VIMDefined in CasablancaDelivered in Casablanca and enhancements expected in F release.

SO interfaces


Out Going
OOFAPIs for placement and homingDefined in BeijingDelivered in Beijing

SO interfaces


Out Going
DCAEFor PNF instantiation message from DCAE over DMaapDefined in CasablancaDelivered in Casablanca

SO interfaces


Incoming
SOL003ETS SOL003 interafces between SO and VNFMDefined in D releaseDelivered in D release

SO interfaces


Out Going
CDSgRPC APIs between SO and CDSDefined in D releaseDelivered in D release

06

Detailed doc in SO

SO-2504 - Getting issue details... STATUS

Out Going
SOl005ETSI SOL005 interface between SO and NFVO (VFC / external)Defined in F releaseDelivered in F release

SO-2504 - Getting issue details... STATUS

Out Going


  • Third Party Products Dependencies

Third Party Products mean products that are mandatory to provide services for your components. Development of new functionality in third party product may or not be expected.
List the Third Party Products (OpenStack, ODL, RabbitMQ, ElasticSearch,Crystal Reports, ...).

Name

FOSS used for Service Orchestrator

In case there are specific dependencies  (Centos 7 vs Ubuntu 16. Etc.) list them as well.

  • Testing and Integration Plans

Provide a description of the testing activities (unit test, functional test, automation,...) that will be performed by the team within the scope of this release.

Describe the plan to integrate and test the release deliverables within the overall ONAP system.
Confirm that resources have been allocated to perform such activities.

  • CSIT tests added as part of R1 will continue to be supported in Dublin.
  • Pairwise testing will be done in the WindRiver Dev lab similar to what was done in Dublin.
  • Gaps

This section is used to document a limitation on a functionality or platform support. We are currently aware of this limitation and it will be delivered in a future Release.
List identified release gaps (if any), and its impact.

Gaps identifiedImpact
N/AN/A
  • Known Defects and Issues

Provide a link toward the list of all known project bugs.

Key Summary T Created Updated Due Assignee Reporter P Status Resolution
Loading...
Refresh


  • Risks

List the risks identified for this release along with the plan to prevent the risk to occur (mitigation) and the plan of action in the case the risk would materialised (contingency).

Risk identifiedMitigation PlanContingency Plan
To fill outTo fill outTo fill out
  • Resources

Fill out the Resources Committed to the Release centralized page.

  • Release Milestone

The milestones are defined at the Release Level and all the supporting project agreed to comply with these dates.

  • Team Internal Milestone

This section is optional and may be used to document internal milestones within a project team or multiple project teams. For instance, in the case the team has made agreement with other team to deliver some artifacts on a certain date that are not in the release milestone, it is erecommended to provide these agreements and dates in this section.

It is not expected to have a detailed project plan.

DateProjectDeliverable
To fill outTo fill outTo fill out
  • Documentation, Training

  • Highlight the team contributions to the specific document related to he project (Config guide, installation guide...).
  • Highlight the team contributions to the overall Release Documentation and training asset
  • High level list of documentation, training and tutorials necessary to understand the release capabilities, configuration and operation.
  • Documentation includes items such as:
    • Installation instructions
    • Configuration instructions
    • Developer guide
    • End User guide
    • Admin guide
    • ...

Note

The Documentation project will provide the Documentation Tool Chain to edit, configure, store and publish all Documentation asset.


Other Information

  • Vendor Neutral

If this project is coming from an existing proprietary codebase, ensure that all proprietary trademarks, logos, product names, etc. have been removed. All ONAP deliverables must comply with this rule and be agnostic of any proprietary symbols.

  • Free and Open Source Software

FOSS activities are critical to the delivery of the whole ONAP initiative. The information may not be fully available at Release Planning, however to avoid late refactoring, it is critical to accomplish this task as early as possible.
List all third party Free and Open Source Software used within the release and provide License type (BSD, MIT, Apache, GNU GPL,... ).
In the case non Apache License are found inform immediately the TSC and the Release Manager and document your reasoning on why you believe we can use a non Apache version 2 license.

Each project must edit its project table available at Project FOSS.


Charter Compliance

The project team comply with the ONAP Charter.