ACTION: Update ReadtheDocs https://git.onap.org/integration/tree/docs - Jira under Integration - invite team for review - invite PTL (Morgan R.) -Gerrit PTL submission +1 from reviewers. committer/Morgan +2 (someone in Integration project will do the Merge)
New project → Repo → DOC directory (RST) in that Repo Andreas Geissler → Signoff for R6 May 2020; M0 for R7. If we are approved by TSC as a new project → create a new Repo
ONAP Architecture Review process:Project Architectural Review Requirements and Process (Draft) to M1 Project PTLs/Feature Sponsors request a review by email from the chair of the arch subcommittee. The chair of the arch subcommittee creates a JIRA issue for the review and emails a link to the project PTL. The project PTL/Feature Sponsor adds the JIRA issue link to the architecture review JIRA task in the M1 epic, as confirmation that a review has been requested.
PFB comment from TSC for the OOF SON requirement. With reference to resource commitment:
Policy: Pam - Shall I indicate AT&T shall cover it, while we subsequently discuss what all enhancements we can do in Guilin timeframe, as well as check reg. some of the aspects where you indicated use case team should contribute (e.g., separate Drools file, which would have to be done by Wipro).
SDN-R/CCSDK:Sandeep - Shall I indicate IBM?
CPS: Shankar/Ben - Given the Guilin release timeframe, I think we have to go for the simplest option (1) and indicate no impact to CPS, where we only change the yang models, and SDN-R continues to do the mapping. modify CCSDK solution to extend interfaces (OOF/SON/PCI Team updates). R7 Solution of C&PS (evolution "ConfigDB" = C&PS) Hard code information
ACTION: R7 VES Common Header update to align with 3GPP SA5 (CR) Nokia/ ATT/ Orange/ Ericsson. Presentation for Monday 2PM UTC on Alla's Req S/C call. "ONAP-ORAN Harmonization". Vimal, Marge, Cormac, Damian. Domain "Standards-Defined" NameSpace "3GPP-CM-xxxx"
The CCSDK work will be in OOF SON PCI team
CCSDK-2392
-
Getting issue details...STATUS
should be mapped to
REQ-345
-
Getting issue details...STATUS
(Generic Requirement) to consider Non-Real Time RIC Pawel Slowikowski
Model Driven C&PS PoC
Proposal (by Ciaran Johnston et al) as a step of Model Driven ONAP, Model Driven CPS. See slides in the Project Proposal page, and also in the R7 CPS Wiki.
Question: Graph DB? Answer: type of data from xNF to be hierarchical which would fit in a Graph DB. doesn't have to be that though. Likely to be one or more underlying database technologies. time series.
Question: Model driven CPS, uS on-boarding in CCSDK. If you plan to do modeling work in R7, consensus from Arch S/C. Answer: would need CPS team, modeling, Arch S/C to be aligned. Want something that can be demonstrated/delivered in R7.
Question: Are there dependencies on platform components? Answer: TBD
- Looking at internal sourcing to get development resources. Sync with theodore johnson
- Status ready to cut code off of x CC-SDK repo. Ongoing analysis. Resourcing Toine has started, 2 new people will be added in August 1, 2020. Present to Architecture S/C before end of July. Engaged Modeling S/C. Visible Yang modeled to be consumed in ONAP. Modeling work will happen in
Choice of IT DB (feeds in). Choice of DB to best fit to the use case. Implement TSDB in PostGres or MariaDB, SQL extensions for TS analysis. Issue is how good is the performance. Not as good as specialized Influx DB. Postgres 10 direct it to store TS DB similar to influx. Database derived from postgres. Timescale DB derived from postres.
Question from Samuli Silvius - State Management was interesting could we get the basic arch picture and def lines of description? Having references e.g. to A&AI is better solution than planned CPS to copy inventory data ANSWER: We are going to prepare a public page and share with you.
Network Slicing & C&PS
CPS w.r.t. Network Slicing: (Swami)
For the Network Slicing use case, we are still working out the details w.r.to RAN slicing, and are also in discussion with O-RAN folks. We expect it to take 1-2 weeks to conclude. Once it is fairly clear, we should discuss reg. the CPS impacts for Guilin.
For now, we have created Jira SDNC-1199 for the CPS requirements for this use case. As of now, we may not have resources to commit for implementing the updates in CPS (but still checking), in this scenario, there are 2 alternatives:
The impacts to CPS (which I expect to be persistence & retrieval of some basic RAN slice config related data) can be handled by existing CPS committed resource
(or)
The details are stored ‘locally’ in a DB in SDN-C for example. In the next release, it is moved to CPS.
(EMAIL) from Swami
For Network Slicing use case, for RAN Slicing, we will be needing a minimal set of information elements for initial RAN configuration and network slice-subnet specific configuration. Our current R7 GUILIN proposal is to extend ConfigDB with the required aspects for Guilin release, and once CPS takes off as an official ONAP project in HOLULU R8 H-release, the work can be taken over into CPS.
ACTION: PERFORMANCE - Open (#@#) open items to get ballpark figures for # API requests.
ACTION: TSC Scheduling & Presentation - Represent at the TSC - (TSC canceled); Tues R6 status; Thursday for general topics . Stakeholders of TSC presocialization Q&A. Schedule pre-review meeting w/ people who asked questions. SCHEDULE MAY 28 TSC 2020-05-28 and scheduled for JUNE 4 2020 TSC 2020-06-04
ACTION: Deadline? - M0/M1 project proposal objective by the TSC.
ACTION: Peer Review Process Step #1 - ONAP Projects - Presentation to ARCH S/C
Deployment in ONAP and related requirements such as documentation were agreed to be a major risk/unknown impact for this new team. Task investigating what is required need to be prioritized
Benjamin Cheung kindly agreed to present detail about ONAP documentation/process in next week meeting
Toine Siebelink will works with swam to identify E2E Network Slicing related user stories such as those required for the new models mentioned below.
Bruno Sakoto will work with Toine to define a list of user stories for the Temporal DB aspects
One all user stories have been identified a team meeting is required to agree what is feasible in the Honolulu time frame
Suggested name for API Mapp/DES like transformer: TemplateBasedDataModelTransformer
TemplateBasedDataModelTransformer will be separate service from CPS and XNF Proxy. for reason of scalability and segregation of responsibilities
E2E Network Slicing Use Case
Sandeep Shah has presented an overview 'new model' that will represent the 'external; data' not captured in the RAN Network model. Thing like Near RTRIC mapping.:
4 models are proposed, all of them contain at least E2E NW Slicing data and some also contain SON data.
Approx. 15-20 queries are being proposed. However is is expected these can all be executed using the same core CPS and xNF Proxy functionality:
qualified cpsPath query (get). assuming each model is stored/associated with its own Anchor. Or the models are tied together using an overarching parent model (yang module). To be discussed!
The goal for MVP is to deploy alternative 2 here (CPS core and NXF-REST proxy in one service) with OOM. With a possible inclusion of Temporal DB RETS interface when available (alternative 3)
Misc
The schedule for the LFN Developer & Testing Forum is now live here. Tony Finnerty& Toine Siebelink will be presenting CPS-NF-Proxy MVP on Thursday Toine Siebelink will be presenting on using Spock and Groovy for unit test
Do we need to de-scope → Agreed to flag that Update functionality might not be achieved in Honolulu time-frame.
E2E Network Slicing Use Case
Agreed name API Mapp/DES like transformer: TemplateBasedDataModelTransformer
Progress on models and query details...
CPS-196
-
Getting issue details...STATUS
E2E Slicing team will provide data sample and query information when ready
CPS-199
-
Getting issue details...STATUS
E2E Slicing team will provide query and 'update' information when ready
CPS-200
-
Getting issue details...STATUS
E2E Slicing team will provide query and 'update' information when ready
Breakdown of user stories discussion:
New function: retrieve DataNode WITHOUT children, do we need this?
Do we need separate user stories for:
Store & retrieve (keyed) Lists
Store & retrieve leaves (standard attributes)
Store & retrieve leafLists
Alternatively work on E2E Slicing models and handle 'bugs' for what is not working Team agreed to handle functionality through bugs as issues with E2E Models and Data samples arise Tests wil need to be added for specific functionality like stores leaves, leafLists etc
Update functionality (no epic or user stories yet!)
E2E network slicing only required CSP updates (no forwarding of updates to NF required as this is done elsewhere already)
What types of updates do we need (what is achievable in Honolulu) Ahila suggested to use Yang Patch payload, see https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8072#page-5 Will try to get more details by next week.
Demo video from LFN Developer and Testing Forum (Feb 2020)
CPS-199
-
Getting issue details...STATUS
Get scenarios can be fulfilled using current get by xpath end point in CPS. Aditya Puthuparambilwil prepare demo for next weeks meeting
CPS-200
-
Getting issue details...STATUS
E2E Slicing team will provide query and 'update' information when ready
REQ-612
-
Getting issue details...STATUS
Backlog grooming meeting on Monday and Tuesdays E2E Slicing follow-up will determine if we make intended scope for Honolulu
REQ-613
-
Getting issue details...STATUSBenjamin Cheung can help us with other project examples
The “knowledge master” of documentation stuff that Ben went to for help was Hagop: BOZAWGLANIAN, HAGOP hb755d@att.com
REQ-614
-
Getting issue details...STATUSClaudio David Gasparini explained new process is ongoing. Probably need script to extend E2E use case like in demo shown today. The PNF Plug and Play Integration Test Cases Page:
Toine Siebelink has shown overview of possible query and update scenarios. CPS Team needs input from E2E NW for the scenarios required by them with data examples and possibly SQL statements etc, Swaminathan Seetharaman will propose follow up meeting for Tuesday examples and data can hopefully be provided earlier
A.O.B. Benjamin Cheung requested CPS Team to join Use Case Realization meeting on 1400 UTC as the Intent Based Network Framework & Modeling (IBN) use case team would be interested in using CPS....
Software Status Ruslan Kashapovis finalizing study on CIST integration tests. Goal is E2E test for CPS applications. Team is free to use any testing method but might be restricted by reporting options. Infrastructure setup might suffice for H-timeframe. Toine Siebelink will contact Chaker Al-Hakimre. template for architecture is finalizing study on CIST integration tests. Goal is E2E test for CPS applications. Team is free to use any testing method but might be restricted by reporting options. Infrastructure setup might suffice for H-timeframe. will contact re. template for architecture documentation. Benjamin Cheungmade a clever suggestion to draft documentation in a Wiki and once reviewed and finalized convert to RST files. This would speed up the review process!
CPS APIsAPI methods #2 and #21 will be prioritized for H release
Both methods use E2E Slicing specific model through CPS-Core. This means NF-Proxy interface not required (for E2E Slicing)
#2 requires new query: CPS-235: Overview of (early) CPS Query and Update Scenarios query #3 This will be handled as a 'bug' as code freeze date is to close #2 also requires a 'with children' option on the query, also to be handled as a 'bug'
#21 is a simple 'get' by xpath with children which is already supported by CPS Core. Latest Model & Data sample need to be confirmed, Toine Siebelink suspect latest data.txt sample provided in
CPS-199
-
Getting issue details...STATUS
is not inline with model. CPS Code has a later data sample. Niamh Corewill update the Jira with the correct sample.
TBDMP Integration as submodule to be discussed with Claudio David Gasparini TBDMP Sub repo in progress, split in separate commits: structure, code, tests. Need to think abut structure and split the PoC in required modules. E2E Slicign team will drive required tasks, track in Jira et with support from CPS Team. krishna moorthy will handle deployment? For now as uService as subschart in CPS but TBDMT should remain independent of CPS! Claudio David Gasparini can support with OOM integration
Explore Yang-Patch, E2E. Sandeep Shahshowed a basic example of a a Yang Patch with an 'edit' operation:
Patches are transactional, if one fails, all fail (and rollback of already completed steps) Patches are NOT used for adding elements to a Yang List
AOB:Benjamin Cheung invited CPS Team to join Use Case Realization meeting on1400 UTC to discuss CPS possibilities for collaboration with Intent Based Networking Project
NF Proxy Early Design, presentation by Tony FinnertyCPS-NCMP-Design.pptx Tony explained the reasoning for new terms 'Network CM Proxy' NCMP 'CMHandle' which will replace the term 'Anchor' in the context of CM Proxy recommend to read about NMDA https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8342
M3 :'code freeze' Thursday
Getting issues...
PLEASE CLOSE ANY TASK THAT IS DONE! Change 'fix version' tag to Istanbul for anything that wont (need to) make Honolulu
E2E Network Slicing Use Case
CPS APIsAPI methods #2 and #21 will be prioritized for H release
Build issues. Claudio David Gaspariniexplained we need to raise a ticket on LNF and create a ci-management change.
OOM integration, we are probably too late for this but krishna moorthywill start process anyway with support from Bruno Sakotoand Claudio David Gasparini OOM integration of TBDMT needs to remain independent of OOM integration of CPS! As a fall back option TBDMT can be manually added to an ONAP deployment for demo or a local deployment an be used.
Need to support at least 2 CPS endpoints.. Get and 'Query'. The query endpoint is ' <server>/cps/api/v1/dataspaces/dataspace/anchors/anchor/nodes/query Demo available in this video. Krishna wil handle this requirement as a 'bug' after M3
Swaminathan Seetharaman will create new REQ's for E2E Slicing and SON PIC (scope to be still discussed internally)
Future of TBDMT, not clear is nice as part of CPS but will require additional resourcing as much work still needed like integration, conform to CPS-Core quality standards etc. Swaminathan Seetharamanand krishna moorthywill prepare slides to follow up this discussion next week with a view to take it to Arch. Committee.
E2E Network Slicing Use Case
CPS APIs How to continue? Proposed to split according to 'operation' 2 teams of 2. Toine Siebelinkwill create Jira's to track this work. If needed CPS team can meet E2E team middle of next week for further clarification. see
CPS-277
-
Getting issue details...STATUS
and
CPS-278
-
Getting issue details...STATUS
OOM blocked, RC0 postponed by 1 week CPS team just waiting on OOM to merge (gating jobs are passing) CPS-290 more scenarios of 500 error to be discussed
Presentation on E2E slicing Check Andy MAYER (ATT) Ruhal Tyagi (Ericsson)
'Home' for TBDMT for review with ArchCom Template need to be aware of Model/Version Versioning could be part of ID Template should be applicable to range of versions Preferred by Team: TBDMT stay in CPS. Main concern is Resourcing. Swami will add slide with options and Pros & Cons and review slide again next week
Owner of slicing 'config' data has to be the 'use-case' (not the TBDMT)
CPS-277
-
Getting issue details...STATUSHanif Kukkalli has started working in this spike
Process for dopping back Toine Siebelink will document a proposed WoW for bugs on confluence with help from team In general all bugs should eb fixed on main branch and dropped back to previous release. Consider API changes, user story Acceptance Criteria etc. If there is no API/behavior impact and it didn't break acceptance criteria then it could be an 'enhancement'. Claudio David Gasparini will prepare for discussion on backward (in)compatible updates next week
AOB
Agreed to change meeting duration back to 1h starting next week
Please note DST has started in US, This will affect attendees in zones with different DST rules