Please add/remove yourself. Thanks!
See also
Goals
- share information between
- O-RAN-SC Non-RT-RIC
- O-RAN-SC OAM
- O-RAN-SC SMO
- ONAP CCSDK/SDNC/SDN-R
- LFN
Recording
Discussion items
Time | Item | Who | Notes |
---|
00:00 | Admin | | Next meetings: 2021-05-26: Martin Skorupski 2021-06-02: John Keeney 2021-06-09: Martin Skorupski 2021-06-16: John Keeney |
00:05 | O-RAN-SC | O-RAN-SC PTLs | Status reports: - Non-RT-RIC: John Keeney
- M4 passed
- integration, testing, documentation (read-the-docs)
- onap - m1
- check point for integration work with Mahesh, Felix - bring it to the RASC meeting tomorrow
- SIM: Alex Stancu
- bug fixing based on integration testing - VES fileReady event NTSim 1.3.1
- both faults are send (id 28, 30) -
- OAM: Martin Skorupski
- M4 passed
- integration, testing, documentation (read-the-docs)
- O-DU: HariomGupta(HCL)
|
00:20 | |
| |
|
| | Support for configuration management notification - according to O1
- For SON use case CCSDK-DMaaP listener for CM-Notify and update CPS
|
|
| | Deployment options - docker-compose vs kubernetes/helm
- both is targeted
- different flavor of helm charts
|
|
| William Diego Maza | O-RAN-SC TOC interworking with ONAP and others - to be defined |
|
| Timo Perala | ongoing process for ONAP to O-RAN-SC TOC... |
END
|
|
|
|
00:?? | Use Case | | OSC Proposed e2e integration use case: O-RU FH connection recovery- REF/Background:
- Martin Skorupski provided intro
- Alarm when fronthaul connection dies (O-DU - O-RU) (VES to SMO)
- John Keeney If there is a failure both O-DU & O-RU will try reconnect anyway - without this loop? Martin Skorupski Yes.
- @? How does SMO connect to O-RU?
- Martin Skorupski This is a mix of different deployment options (hierarchical vs hybrid, O1 vs M-Plane). Main issue is agreeing models & terminology.
- John Keeney Seems this use case is not real-world useful, especially since recovery will happen automatically anyway, & mix of standards ...
- Martin Skorupski John Keeney Using this use case as longer term motivator for SMO/NONRTRIC/rApp development - independent of usecase
- Topology ??:
- May need a topology service for this use case - John Keeney Will use a simple file/hardcoded for initial versions of this use case.
- Paweł Pawlak Andy Mayer Topology in A&AI, CPS ? John Keeney No - not initially. Plan to keep it simple for this release.
<bridge dropped recording stopped at this point. Most participants reconnected once bridge started again> - Topology ??: (contd)
- John Keeney Lots of options for how this should be done properly in ONAP.
- Swaminathan Seetharaman ONAP usecases already have some plans for this e.g. slicing, oof, etc
- Andy Mayer A model should be agreed in ONAP. Lots of previous discussions in ONAP - e.g. what goes in A&AI and CPS ... but that was a while ago.
- Martin Skorupski SDNR has some topology model too - not standards based.
- @Sven John Keeney Martin Skorupski Lots of issues with different topology models ... and most existing hierarchical models break down in a 5G/CloudRan environment
- Lots of work ... Andy Mayer Martin Skorupski Can create a JIRA in ONAP MODCOM ...
- ... but will keep it simple here for this use case.
- @? Will other O1 usecases be effected? Martin Skorupski i No. O1 functions continue as before.
- Martin Skorupski Please add feedback if any
|
Action items