Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

 | 9am PDT |  noon EDT | 16:00 UTC | 18:00 CEST | 21:30 IST 


ZOOMhttps://us02web.zoom.us/j/89069708424?pwd=aGJOZm54eTUxd0FXR0VCU1N0ejBrUT09
Meeting ID: 890 6970 8424

Attendees

Informed

Discussion items

TimeItemWhoNotes
00:00Admin

Next meetings: 

2021-06-02: John Keeney 

2021-06-09: Martin Skorupski

2021-06-16: John Keeney

2021-06-23: Martin Skorupski

00:05O-RAN-SCO-RAN-SC PTLs

Status reports:

  • Non-RT-RIC: John Keeney
    • doc
    • deployment
  • SIM: Alex Stancu
    • bug in sysrepo (see previous meeting)
      • new NTSim version 1.3.3 fixed that issue
      • issue can be closed in sysrepo for v2 (wink)
  • OAM: Martin Skorupski
    • deployment/integration topics - IPv6 → DNS (smile) (E-Release)
  • O-DU: HariomGupta(HCL)
    • edit-config under review 
    • int osc lab - version of SMO

Target non-rt-ric / oam - smo - solution in OSC in June (asap)

  • for Honolulu bug fixes - we may go via policy docker hub

ToC - first discussion about E-Release - goes to RSAC

00:20O-RAN f2f
  • OAM involved in O-RAN related topics
    • Modeling processes (strong help by Ben)
    • Tooling proposal 
    • FM coordination (AlarmDictionary)
    • PM coordination 
    • SMO features, architecture
    • IM/DM status
    • (Network)-Topology - experience with TAPI 
  • RASC and SMO Architecture discussion

for O-RAN members only ;( (https://oranalliance.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/OAH/pages/1788641297/Virtual+F2F+Meetings+June+1+-+June+14+2021)

00:30

Q/A





Kamel Idir

Non-RT-RIC deployed with kubernetes

  • how to access the control-panel?
  • version cherry
  • access the gateway function 
  • details via email
  • documentation for D-Release 

END






00:??Use Case

@all

OSC Proposed e2e integration use case: O-RU FH connection recovery

<bridge dropped recording stopped at this point. Most participants reconnected once bridge started again>

  • Topology ??: (contd)
    • John Keeney Lots of options for how this should be done properly in ONAP.
    • Swaminathan Seetharaman ONAP usecases already have some plans for this e.g. slicing, oof,  etc
    • Andy Mayer A model should be agreed in ONAP. Lots of previous discussions in ONAP - e.g. what goes in A&AI and CPS ... but that was a while ago.
    • Martin Skorupski SDNR has some topology model too - not standards based.
    • @Sven John Keeney Martin Skorupski Lots of issues with different topology models ... and most existing hierarchical models break down in a 5G/CloudRan environment
    • Lots of work ... Andy Mayer Martin Skorupski Can create a JIRA in ONAP MODCOM ...
    • ... but will keep it simple here for this use case.
  • @? Will other O1 usecases be effected? Martin Skorupski i No. O1 functions continue as before.
  • Martin Skorupski Please add feedback if any



Action items