Modeling Subcommittee 2022-03-07

ASD model   0  mins

Co-Chair:

     -  ONAP Model Governance Update       15mins - Have no time  to discuss

     -  Second Workshop with ETSI, suggest to happen at CET 2:00-3:00 PM on 3.15 or 3.22 , agenda: 1)deep-dive on ASD information elements    2)Q&A 
         ETSI will provide gotomeeting bridge

        Time: Suggest to 3.22.

        Next Step:Details of external cp and etc., don't need to prepare much materials.

       Ericsson: What should be talked to them?       

       Catherine: it is good to share the work to SDO. We try to move forward to cloud native and we can let the ETSI to learn the fruit of ONAP.

      Thinh: Suggest ETSI to prepare questions first. Agree with Catherine to share. Can ETSI change their architecture?If so, we can do and discuss something. Answer Bruno's questions.

      Marian: how to consider this workshop?

     Byung:ASD doesn't use MANO, does the discussion include the MANO architecture.

     Xu: IM is not related with implementation, we should separate them, it is necessary to share the info in the workshop to know the differences of current work in ETSI. Currently not go for the architecture.

    Thinh and Byung: DM should align with IM, so DM and implementation are derived from IM.

    Xu: It shoud be "Information model is independent with any specific implementation "

   Catherine: ETSI can do what they want, we just share. Suggest to move the current page to clean "version 1" and as the starting point.

   Fred: Grab and supplementthe the missing attributes comparing the ETSI model, suggest not move to "clean" now

   Ericsson: Answer to fred, the information is in helm chart , it is another expression.

  Catherine: For the workshop, we should have the time for them and clean up the concerns before moving to "clean".

   Xu: We have one IM for container, now there is another proposal, prefer to have one IM,don't have a separated one.

  Thinh: How to avoid the abstract layer,such as ETSI MANO to cloud native K8S, avoid the mapping input and ouput attributes of cloud native ways ?That is the background of ASD. 

 Conclusion and AP: Ask the ETSI to prepare the questions and bring to ONAP before 3.15 and try to clean up the concerns, we can use their bridge(recordings) and use CNF task force wiki page to carry the questions.

ETSI CNF support   mins

Reverse engineering  mins

Topology model   mins

Modeling Documentation  mins

-  Modeling current activity status

-  AAI model review request

Review AAI’s REST Spec/Schema AAI REST API Documentation - Jakarta on CNF and CCVPN Intent-based Cloud Leased Line and Closed-loop efforts.

Do we need to invite AAI team for an update of the status?

Xu will contact AAI team later.

- ONAP Model Governance Update

R9 DM proposal: https://wiki.onap.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=93011772

ongoing work on alignment IFA011 v4.3.1

Abstract Topology Model

https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Proposed+Topology+IM+Sketch